Dissention in the Ranks!

Dissention in the Ranks!

Wizbang reports:

“America, this is what a feminist looks like”

Who said that about Sarah Palin? Would you believe the president of LA’s National Organization for Women, Shelly Mandel? Amazing! This is quite a moment for her to push back against the pressure from the feminist groups who see Sarah Palin as a traitor because she’s a Republican and pro-life who actually lived her principles.

There’s video. The Wizbang post concludes:

Shelly gave a wonderful endorsement. I’m thrilled to have her as a fellow Sarah Palin supporter. If other feminists and NOW presidents come out and trash Shelly, we need to stand behind her and give her a lot of support.

I was talking to my husband about this and told him that this is probably the reason why she went to California. The endorsement of the president of one of the largest chapters of NOW is huge, which explains why the MSM isn’t reporting it.

A quick Google News search comes up with three (3) stories on Shelly Mandel. Story #1, MSNBC:

Palin Repeats Ayers Line in CA

CARSON, Calif. — Last night, Palin reiterated her claims that Obama “sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who target their own country.”

“Turns out one of his earliest supporters is a man, who according to the New York Times, was a domestic terrorist,” Palin told about 10,000 supporters at a rally at the Home Depot Center. She was referring to William Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s, which sought to bomb the Pentagon and US Capitol.

“No, this is not a man who sees America as you and I see America,” she said of Obama. “We see Americas as a force for good in this world. We see an America of exceptionalism.

“Our opponent is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who target their own country.”

Eighth paragraph down in the piece:

Palin was introduced by Shelly Mandell, the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women.

Update: Note that slight error. Mandell isn’t the President of the LA chapter of NOW, apparently she’s the entire membership!

Mandell said she was supporting Palin as an individual; NOW’s national political action committee has backed Obama.

The other two links are from September.

Yahoo News? Nada.

CNN? “No Results”

Fascinating!

ONLY 59%?

ONLY 59%?

Rasmussen reports:

59% Would Vote to Replace Entire Congress

Congress was front and center in the national news last week and the American people were far from impressed. If they could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, 59% of voters would like to throw them all out and start over again. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 17% would vote to keep the current legislators in office.

Today, just 23% have even a little confidence in the ability of Congress to deal with the nation’s economic problems and only 24% believe most Members of Congress understand legislation before they vote on it.

As others have said, “So much for taxation without representation.” We’re getting representation without representation.

Despite these reviews, more than 90% of Congress is likely to be elected this November due to an electoral system designed to benefit incumbents. The biggest advantage offered those in the House of Representatives is a process known as Gerrymandering where Congressional Districts are loaded with friendly voters from Representative’s own party. In effect, Members of Congress—working through their state legislature–get to choose their voters rather than letting voters choose their Congressman.

Also aiding incumbents is high name recognition from news coverage, large staffs funded by taxpayers, and other perks. While the staff positions are technically excluded from politics, the constituent services they provide in a Congressman’s name are among the most effective of all campaign techniques.

Not to mention the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Campaign Finance Reform Act.

This doesn’t surprise me, though:

While unhappiness with Congress cuts across partisan and demographic lines, Democrats are a bit less unhappy than other voters. Seventy-four percent (74%) of Republicans would vote to throw out the entire Congress as would 62% of unaffiliated voters. Only 43% of Democrats go along. Still, just 25% of those in Barack Obama’s party would vote to keep the entire Congress even though it’s controlled by Democrats.

However, there is agreement across party lines when it comes to whether or not most Members of Congress understand legislation before they vote on it—25% of Democrats say yes along with 24% of Republicans and 24% of unaffiliated voters.

Apparently 57% of Democrats polled are fine with that.

When the Constitution was written, the nation’s founders expected that there would be a 50% turnover in the House of Representatives every election cycle. That was the experience they witnessed in state legislatures at the time (and most of the state legislatures offered just one-year terms). For well over 100 years after the Constitution was adopted, the turnover averaged in the 50% range as expected.

In the twentieth century, turnover began to decline. As power and prestige flowed to Washington during the New Deal era, fewer and fewer Members of Congress wanted to leave. In 1968, Congressional turnover fell to single digits for the first time ever and it has remained very low ever since.

Thank you Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Thank you so much.

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

I asked her if she’d ever fired a gun before, and she had to think for a moment. Once, she replied, at the carnival, shooting at the paper target.

Ma’am? That’s a BB gun. It goes tick-tick-tick-tick. A real gun makes a sound like the earth coming apart and produces a muzzle flash the size of a large pizza. When you shoot a .45 caliber 1911-A1 hand cannon, you will know it. You will have no trouble remembering the experience whatsoever. And when I told her that what I like to shoot at most often was a life-sized paper image of Osama Bin Laden, she literally gasped in amazement. They let you do that?

Let you? They not only let you do it, they charge you for it. That’s the sound of freedom, baby! BOOOOOM!! Bill Whittle, National Review Online, “Cowboys and Secret Agents”

An American Carol

My wife and I just got back from the theater. We had to drive a little farther than normal because it is only showing in four theaters in town, none close to home. The theater we saw it at had it in only one of their 20 houses, and it was one of the smaller houses, probably 250 seats.

They were 98% full, or close to it – a mostly older crowd. I don’t think I saw anyone under the clichéd age of 30.

Interestingly, the first trailer shown was for Oliver Stone’s “W”. The crowd actually boo’d – then laughed about the spontaneous response. Somehow I don’t think this was the target audience for “W”.

An American Carol is laugh-out-loud funny in a lot of places, and it skewers every Lefty trope, meme, archetype, and shibboleth. It’s not Airplane!, but it has got the funny.

Except in one scene near the end.

John Voight plays George Washington (briefly) in the film. That part isn’t funny. I’m sure the critics will call it mawkish. The scene is not mawkish, and I won’t post a spoiler other than that.

On the 0-10 scale, I give it a solid 7.5. It’s worth your money for the entertainment. It’s also worth your money to tell the dealmakers in Hollywood that if they want to make money, they ought to cater to the audience that has it.

As the lead characters said in one scene, “What about the soldier who rapes the young Iraqi girl and murders her family?!?” – “Brian DePalma. Straight to video.”

Bailout is Law

Bailout is Law

By Jeanne Sahadi, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: October 3, 2008: 5:52 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — After two weeks of contentious and often emotional debate, the federal government’s far-reaching and historic plan to bail out the nation’s financial system was signed into law by President Bush on Friday afternoon.

“By coming together on this legislation, we have acted boldly to prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country,” Bush said less than an hour after the House voted 263 to 171 to pass the bill.

The House vote followed a strong lobbying push by the White House and other supporters of the bill. The House rejected a similar measure on Monday – a defeat that shocked the markets and congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle.

The law, which allows the Treasury Secretary to purchase as much as $700 billion in troubled assets in a bid to kick-start lending, ushers in one of the most far-reaching interventions in the economy since the Great Depression.

My only commentary is actually someone else’s:


UPDATE: Donald Sensing elaborates.

UPDATE II: Tom Blumer of PJM elaborates further.

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

From yesterday’s Rush Limbaugh Show:

RUSH: Gainesville, Florida. Jeff, welcome to the EIB Network. Hello.

CALLER: Good afternoon, Rush. I hope this call finds you well.

RUSH: Thank you, sir, very well.

CALLER: Listen, this is an aside to why I called, but I just wanted you to know that I got an $8,000 loan yesterday to replace the air-conditioning in my home.

RUSH: How much of a down payment did it require?

CALLER: Zero down payment, 6.9% interest.

RUSH: How many years?

CALLER: It will be about four years.

RUSH: Four years to pay for your new air conditioner?

CALLER: Yes, sir.

RUSH: Zero down payment. Are you a minority?

CALLER: Not yet.