Month: January 2009

Job Creation

KevinLeave a comment

Job Creation

Glenn linked to this fascinating (in a weirdly sick way) graph courtesy of Fabius Maximus:

President Obama talks a lot about “job creation.” It looks like Bush and his predecessors have all done a bang-up job of that! I guess Obama is going to turbocharge it?

I am reminded of a conversation I had with a coworker several years ago. His mother works for the Census Bureau. Her job has great benefits, lots of holidays, generous vacation and sick leave, and an excellent retirement plan. For about two and a half years at a stretch, her job is quiet and undemanding. Then, for about eighteen months it’s hectic, and the hours can be somewhat long, though she is compensated for the overtime. At one family gathering, during the slow period, she commented to all that working for the .gov was just terrific, and “I don’t know why everybody doesn’t work for the government!”

Into the short silence that followed, my coworker replied, “We do. For about the first five months of every year.”

Anybody expecting it to exceed six in the not-too-distant future?

Range Report – .260 Remington T/C Encore

KevinLeave a comment

Sorry for the delay. Family stuff and then the drive back up to Wickenburg interfered. Plus, I have to get up at 4:30 tomorrow morning, so this will be short.

I drove up to the Casa Grande public range this morning after getting a late start. I did, however, remember this time to bring both range bags, so I had my spotting scope, chronograph, and laser rangefinder with me. I set up my target frame at a measured 28 yards downrange and proceeded to put ten rounds on target through the chrono getting the scope adjusted. The last four rounds went into one hole, as expected. I don’t have the data sheet in front of me, but IIRC, the average velocity was 2360fps with an extreme spread of 60fps and a standard deviation of just over 20. I was shooting Lapua Scenar 139 grain BTHP bullets seated out to an overall length of 2.880″ over 36.0 grains of Varget, touched off by CCI 250 large rifle magnum primers. (USE THIS LOAD DATA AT YOUR OWN RISK – I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE IF YOU BLOW UP YOUR GUN BASED ON DATA YOU GOT OFF A BLOG AND DIDN’T CROSS-CHECK WITH OTHER SOURCES.)

I was amazed at the lightness of the recoil (and no, I’m not kidding!) That muzzle brake WORKS. Oh, the pistol jumps a bit, and it is also LOUD AS HELL, but it doesn’t kick. I wore muffs and plugs, and I was sitting behind it. I’m pretty sure I drove off some other shooters who were off to my left. (I was on the right end of the range.)

Because of the pressures of time (I had a family commitment in the very early afternoon) I was only able to put another 15 rounds through the pistol this morning. One very impressive thing, at least to me, was that I strung five shots horizontally right along the zero elevation line of my target at a measured 300 yards. The pistol needs some trigger adjustment for sure – I’m blaming that shot string on me, though. That group ran just over four inches wide.

I settled down for the last five-shot string and got another four-inch group in the standard cover-with-palm pattern. I’m certain that this specific load will shoot better than that if I do my part properly. I was seeing a little bit of primer flattening, so I think my next loads will drop by about a half-grain, and I want to see just how far out I can seat those very long bullets before they touch the rifling. I also want to try the 120 grain Scenars to see how they perform, but their ballistic coefficient is not as good as the 139’s. I also want to take this pistol to the Tucson Rifle Club and try it out on the 500 meter rifle silhouette range to see if I have enough elevation in the scope to reach out that far without putting more offset in the rings.

This is going to be a very fun pistol!

Long-Range Pistol

KevinLeave a comment

At last year’s Gunblogger’s Rendezvous, David of Random Nuclear Strikes attended and brought with him his Boomershoot pistol – a Thompson/Center Encore chambered in .308 Winchester. He also brought with him as handouts a reprint of an American Handgunner article from 1995 about Don Bower and his long-range pistols. Entitled “Ultimate Handgun Accuracy: 1½” Groups at ¼ Mile,” it certainly piqued my interest! (The piece is available at the link.)

I shot David’s pistol at the Palomino Valley Gun Club, whacking the 400 yard gong with ease.

Had to have one.

So to “celebrate” Obama’s victory, one of the things I bought in November was a T/C Encore frame. Then I ordered a custom Bullberry .260 Remington barrel. Finally I bought a Burris 3-12X pistol scope, Burris Signature Zee rings, a set of offset inserts for the rings, a Pachmayr grip, a Harris bipod, 200 pieces of Remington .260 brass, and some ammo boxes. (Bullets, powder and primers I’ve already got.) The last of the parts arrived this week.

I haven’t got everything adjusted yet, nor all the screws tightened down, but here’s what she looks like:


You can’t see it, but the action is open on that last photo. Yes, I know the scope is canted. I still have to get everything adjusted just right, but I wanted to post photos, dammit! Oh, that spirit level is the 1″ unit that Ninth Stage sent me, along with the 30mm unit for my Remington 700 5R.

I also wanted to say something nice about a vendor. I buy a lot of stuff from MidwayUSA, and their prices and performance have been uniformly good. But we gunnies are cheap frugal bastards, and price is important to us. When I went looking for rings for the Remington 700 5R, Midway was out of stock, Brownell’s didn’t carry what I wanted, and they were nowhere to be found locally. A little Google searching brought me to Optics Planet. They had what I wanted, in stock, and at a good price – even better when there was no freight charge.

When I went shopping for that Burris 3-12X pistol scope, as always the first place I went looking was SWFA.com. They usually have the lowest prices, and I’ve never had a problem with anything I’ve gotten from them. However, at the time I was looking, Midway was having a sale on the very Burris scope I was looking for, and it was less than SWFA. Unfortunately, neither of them had the Burris Signature Zee rings I wanted, so off to Optics Planet I went and while I was there I checked on the scope as well.

They had it, and it was less than Midway’s sale price. Plus free shipping. They also had the rings and the offset inserts for them. (I’ve got +20MOA of offset in the back ring.)

I ordered 200 pieces of brass, four 50-round ammo boxes, and the Pachmayr grip from Midway the same night I placed the order for the Burris scope and rings. I got the scope and rings first.

I’m not denigrating Brownells, Midway or SWFA at all, they’re all great vendors. But if you’re looking for some glass or some rings, check out Optics Planet. You might be glad you did.

Anyway, when I go to Boomershoot this year, I’m taking both the 700 5R and this pistol. Hopefully I can get some ammo loaded tonight and make a trip to the range dark and early tomorrow morning!

Another Invitation

KevinLeave a comment

Another Invitation

Say Uncle linked to a David Codrea post at Gun Rights Examiner where a sportswriter showed his ignorance in the comments and was promptly smacked down for it. Feelings apparently hurt, the writer took his ball and went home after complaining about how nasty gun rights advocates were.

So once again I have decided to extend the olive branch and invite the sportswriter, Tom Ferda, to have an open, public discussion on the topic of gun rights right here at this blog or anywhere else he feels comfortable. Even though I’m up to my eyeballs with work for at least the next two weeks, I really want to engage Mr. Ferda. Here’s the text of the email I sent him tonight:

Mr. Ferda:

Welcome to the wonderful world of the gun rights debate! My name is Kevin Baker, and I live in Tucson, Arizona. No, I’m not Kevin Baker the award-winning novelist, I’m Kevin Baker the Professional Electrical Engineer who happens to run a blog by the name of The Smallest Minority, if you care to Google my name (which is how I found your email address).

Obviously you’re new to this topic, but don’t feel too bad – many are. On both sides. The problem is, there’s been a concerted effort for, oh, the past forty years or so to remove firearms from the public. It’s been described as a “decades-long slow-motion hate crime” against gun owners, and a lot of us are quite tired of it. So you were the recipient of some (very mild!) backlash when you demonstrated your ignorance the topics of firearms and Constitutional law.

I understand that you’ll find this difficult to believe, but when you wrote the words “semi-automatic machine guns” you basically punched nearly every hot-button most of us on this side of the aisle have. The ones you missed on that first pass you punched – emphatically – with the words “think about when these original right to bear arms laws were written.”

Mr. Ferda, I’m a calm, collected kind of guy. I started blogging with the intention of debating people like you in a public forum. Honestly, I don’t expect to change your mind, and I’m absolutely certain you won’t change mine (my position being the result of well over a decade of research, study, and consideration – I should have a PhD in the philosophy of gun rights) but I do believe that people LEARN when they discuss and defend their positions with people who DISAGREE with them. Hopefully, so do you, since you wrote: “Stay aggressive, call people with different opinions idiots and chase us all out of your area. You guys are doing a great job of forming a group where everyone can have identical opinions and keep anyone else out of the club.” And: “Good-bye and enjoy conversing amoungst yourselves without any more comments from people like myself who may differ in opinion.”

I earnestly wish to have a discussion with you – in a public forum! I will remain civil, factual, and I will give citations with links for you to follow and verify. (You’ll have to bear with me, however, as my day job at the moment is pretty overwhelming, so my responses will be necessarily slow.) I am willing to give you guest-posting privileges at my blog, and I promise not to edit anything you write (except possibly for readability – text size, font, etc. – never content) or you may email me your responses and I can post those – again, in total and without editing – or you may post your half of the discussion anywhere you’d like, so long as I can copy those posts to my blog for archival purposes.

I do have open comments. If you are as sensitive to the response of the readers as you appear to be at the Gun Rights Examiner post, I suggest you not read them. Oh, and this invitation is also being published at my blog.

I hope you do accept this challenge. I promise you, if nothing else you will come away much more knowledgeable about the topic.

Kevin Baker,
Tucson, AZ

Here’s hoping he accepts. Whatever the response, you’ll be the first second to know!

UPDATE, 1/19 8:00PM: No response from Mr. Ferda as of yet.

More Linky, No Thinky

KevinLeave a comment

More Linky, No Thinky

Once again, a link to Hecate’s Crossroad of “advice” on how to be a good robbery victim from the Omaha World-Herald.

SOS.

Quote of the Day goes to Hecate:

This steaming pile just leaves me speechless.

Well, not exactly speechless . . .

And, if you have a lot of spare time on your hands, you might enjoy the Discovery Channel’s Non-Line-of-Sight cannon game. How much stuff can you blow up? Link courtesy of one of Hecate’s commenters, Rio Arriba of Notes from the American Outback.

Another long day tomorrow, and next week looks worse.

In Re: Sucking Up

KevinLeave a comment

In Re: Sucking Up

Hecate of Hecate’s Crossroads posts on why she put links to the three Dangerous Victims essays on her sidebar. Excerpt:

I recall a friend describing a brief time when he worked in a liquor store. It was the only one in the area that had never been robbed. The store owner had a policy that anyone working there had to have a gun and carry it openly.

RTWT.

(Sorry, but 12.5 hour days are not conducive to “thinky” blog posts, thus you get “linky” blog posts. And not many of those.)