Politics is the art of compromise. Unfortunately, compromises between two perfectly rational alternatives so very often make no sense at all. — Paraphrased from Neal Stephenson, Anathem
Author: Kevin
Quote of the Day – TamNation Division
Look, Mr. Media Matters Commenter, the terms “Liberal” and “Conservative” have become meaningless when used to relate to party politics in this country. Nowadays we just have the Party of Big Government and the Party of Even Bigger Government and the easiest way of telling them apart is that one of them doesn’t like abortion and gay cooties. — Tam at View from the Porch, Meanwhile, in Bizarroland . . .
What Happened in Massachusetts Yesterday
A visual representation of what sitting Democrat members of Congress just saw out their windows last night when Coakley conceded:

A NSFW visual image of what I expect the Republican Party to do with the opportunity:

That is all.
Oh, and BTW
Oh, and BTW
Congratulations to Massachusetts! I’m sure the entire Kennedy clan is whirling in their graves.
I know Jay is happy!
Nice of Him to Admit it On the Air
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbwfq6-RTbQ&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1&w=425&h=344]What else is Matthews “a Marxist” about? Found at Weasel Zippers via Glenn. Quote of the Day, via the same Instapundit link: So Tell, Me, Mr. Olbermann… How do those teabags taste? — Confederate Yankee
In Honor of the MA Special Election
In Honor of the MA Special Election
A Quote of the Day taken from the header at Primeval Papa, the blog of my Fearless (former) Leader:
There is something about a Republican that you can only stand him just so long; and on the other hand, there is something about a Democrat that you can’t stand him quite that long. — Will Rogers
I could not think up a more apt quotation for this day!
How’s This for an Odd Coincidence?
How’s This for an Odd Coincidence?
It’s my first day back to work after being laid off December 7, six weeks ago. It’s raining. It doesn’t do that much here in Southern Arizona.
The last day it rained here in NW Tucson was Dec. 7.
Quote of the Day – Sociology Edition
Quote of the Day – Sociology Edition
I’ve been saving this one for a while now:
There is a certain tier of our personal and societal operating system that is herd based. Unless you have both the capacity and will to transcend this, your operative mode will be primarily that of a herd member.
Most humans are neither interested in, nor capable of, the sort of extended autonomous operations that is the signature of herd transcendence.
Kings are nothing more than the herd alphas, who have fought their way to the top of the stack using the operating methods of herd pecking order, which is sometimes gross physical combat and sometimes not.
Our libertarian concept of “neither seeking to rule, nor accept being ruled” is fundamentally revolutionary: it fundamentally removes the fully operational human from the herd context. It is a qualitative difference between humans, and our society, America, is one of the few (only?) to even attempt to recognize, foster and celebrate this.
Which is all fine and dandy, until the herd, which hasn’t gone away, goes WTF?
— TheGeekWithA.45 in the comment thread to Entropy Happens from last September.
And on that note, I rejoin the herd workforce!
How Did THAT Happen?
Taking advantage of my last weekday as an unemployed person, I caught the first matinee showing of The Book of Eli at the local googleplex Friday. It is another of this year’s crop of apocalyptic films that began (humorously) with Zombieland, went craptacular with 2012, then ultra-depressing with The Road.
Interestingly, Eli could be seen as a sort of sequel to The Road. The apocalypse that The Man and The Boy trudge through in The Road occurred only ten years previously. In Eli it’s thirty years in the past. Both movies are filmed in very muted colors, and in both films the majority of human beings shown are amoral predators. In this one, however, the main character travels, initially, alone – and he is ultra-competent at defending himself and his possessions. I’ll give the Hughes brothers credit – the action scenes are very well done.
There are, of course, plot holes big enough to drive a Mack truck through, but if you’re willing to suspend disbelief and go with it the story is pretty good. Gary Oldman does a fine job of playing the same character he played in The Fifth Element and The Professional – a whacked-out power-crazed nutjob. Jennifer Beals’ hair puts in a nice appearance, and Mila Kunis did her job as the apprentice seeking protection and knowledge from the Master. The sets were sufficiently post-apocalypty, but I wonder why there were two concrete cooling towers out in the desert with nothing else around them?
The interesting thing about the film, however, was its pro-Christian message. How did that happen? Of course, there’s a scene that puts it all in “perspective,” in the end, but the plot twist at the climax carries a significant message that only the deaf, blind and stupid could miss.
I give it about 8.5 out of 10. Definitely not a waste of my time or my money.
Color Me Surprised (Not)
Color Me Surprised (Not)
Back in 2003, May 31 to be precise, I posted this humorous warning sign:

Now Instapundit brings us this news:
Sex sting in Poconos nets former chief U.N. weapons inspector
A former chief United Nations weapons inspector is accused of contacting what he thought was a 15-year-old girl in an Internet chat room, engaging in a sexual conversation and showing himself masturbating on a Web camera.
Scott Ritter of Delmar, N.Y., who served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and who was an outspoken critic of the second Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq, is accused of contacting what turned out to be a Barrett Township police officer posing undercover as a teen girl.
I’m not going to reproduce the sexually graphic portion of the story, but this is where that warning sign came from:
The New York Post reported Ritter had been caught in a similar case involving a 14-year-old girl in April 2001, but that he was not charged.
In 1998, Ritter resigned from the United Nations Special Commission weapons inspection team and has been the most outspoken critic of U.S. policy toward Baghdad.
Instapundit asks, “So you don’t think Scott Ritter was blackmailable, or anything, and that this might have had something to do with his sudden change of position?”