Dept. of Our Collapsing Schools

I have already concluded that the reason our school systems are collapsing (or have collapsed, depending on just how far gone you feel they are) is due to the fact that it’s far easier to lead a nation of ignorant people than a nation of intelligent, questioning, reasoning people. In fact, I found this quote at A Life of Freedom this morning that says it better than I can:

“Reason and Ignorance, the opposites of each other, influence the great bulk of mankind. If either of these can be rendered sufficiently extensive in a country, the machinery of Government goes easily on. Reason obeys itself; and Ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.” — Thomas Paine

So here’s another example of what our school system is doing to our children, allowed by our apathy, via Emuse:

Gently, gently, Mama began to probe with her 8-year-old the ramifications of grading a whole class based on the behavior of a few students (especially those identified since kindergarten as incapable of marshalling self-discipline, let alone of expressing learning skills). What, I asked, were individuals assessed upon?

That may seem a bit over-wrought — unless you have children partaking of the current public education system. And, as I always hasten to add, ours is a very good public education system.

Unfortunately, more and more, “very good” is coming to mean: I’ll teach your children to read, write and cipher in exchange for being allowed to indoctrinate them in socialist, entitlement, tolerance dogma. “Bad” is coming to mean: I’ll indoctrinate them in the same, but won’t bother to teach ’em to read, write and cipher.

That’s it precisely. And it defines the difference between “collapsing” and “collapsed.” Go read the whole post.

Nod to Acidman for the pointer.

“Never Have So Many Been So Wrong About So Much” for So Long

Apologies to Sec. Rumsfeld, but this guy is so stereotypical it’s almost a parody.

His name is Scott Bateman, and he’s a freelance cartoonist. Allow me to fisk his three most recent political cartoons:

Actually here Scott is illustrating two ignorances – the general public’s and his own. First, the majority of Americans believe that Saddam was in some way responsible for the 9/11 attacks, which is not true. But is the war on Iraq part of the War on Terror? Absolutely. I invite you to read (if you haven’t already) two excellent pieces: Our World-Historical Gamble by Lee Harrison, and Steven Den Beste’s outline on the cause of the War on Terror. Yes, Scott, the war in Iraq is part of the War on Terror.

Note also the typical liberal’s respect for the “little people” – those they want government to rigidly control for their own good.

A government run, of course, by caring, compassionate liberals who believe that everyone is equal. But they’re the “More Equal,” of course. The rest of us are obviously idiots.

Next we have this one:

Note the unselfconscious use of the word “quagmire.” The invasion of Afghanistan was supposed to be a quagmire. The 21-day assault on Iraq was supposed to be a quagmire. Neither was. Now that we’ve overthrown the Taliban, unseated Saddam, kicked the crap out of Al Qaeda, and prevented any follow-up terror attacks on American soil for two years, Mr. Bateman characterises this as “screwing up badly.” I don’t know what planet he’s living on, but apparently it isn’t this one. Unless he’s in France, of course.

If all you see is what the newspapers and national networks show, I can understand his pessimism, but reports from the people on the ground aren’t so one-sided. They see the people of Iraq overwhelmingly happy that we’ve freed them. LTCR (select) Smash has this anecdote. Sgt. Pontifex explains that California is not limited to the L.A. city limits, nor is Iraq limited to the Sunni Triangle. Then there are these four reports from Basra. There’s much, much more out there if you just take a little time and look.

The “real world,” Mr. Bateman?

Pot? Meet Kettle.

Finally, we have this, most recent piece:

Note that none of Mr. Bateman’s “interviewees” are apparently among the majority of “idiots” he decries in the first cartoon. No, in this case they’re exclusively limited to the moonbat minority.

The first says: “Everything’s just as it was before 9/11.” Really? 3,000 people aren’t dead? The twin towers are still standing? The Taliban still rules Afghanistan and still protects Bin Laden and Al Qaeda? Saddam and Sons still terrorize the Iraqis? We haven’t killed seven and captured five of Al Qaeda’s top 31 people? (That’s over a third.)

The second says: “We’ve thrown two countries into total chaos.” Is that a fact? Not according to what I’ve been reading. Of course, we have freed them from murderous totalitarian regimes, so I can see why the caring, compassionate liberal would be upset by that. (See “More Equal,” above.)

The third says: “The Bush Administration has failed miserably.” Afghanistan: nine weeks. Taliban: removed. Iraq – three weeks. Saddam: unseated. Uday and Qusay: Dead and Deader. Bin Laden: running for his life. Al Qaeda: severely damaged. Recent terror attacks on U.S. soil – zero.

This is “failing miserably?” No wonder nobody knows who the Democratic Presidential candidates are.

The fourth says: “I’d feel way safer if I could cower with Dick Cheney in that undisclosed location.”

No, you’d feel way safer if we’d just wrung our hands, tried to “understand why they hate us,” and attempted to buy the forgiveness of the Islamists. I’ve got news for you, Scott: You’re way safer today than you were two years ago. All the radical Islamists are trying to get into Iraq and Afghanistan to keep us from destroying their fantasy ideology.

You’re safer, but apparently not any brighter.

(Bateman’s a Kucinich supporter. Why am I not surprised?)

OK, I MUST Comment on This (From work…)

The BBC is reporting that Mr. Kevin Morris, chairman of the Police Superintendents Association in England wants “every Briton” in a DNA database.

I am not surprised.

Disappointed, but not surprised.

Orwell was just a little off in his dates.

And I am once again reminded of our Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

The Britons who understood this idea apparently left to come here.

But here’s the money asshat quote from the article:

“Experience has shown that the general public come forward in their thousands when they believe their sample will help police to detect a serious crime.”

Right. Step forward and prove yourself innocent like a good little prole. We’re from the government and we’re here to help you.

To the brits: I hope your chains rest lightly upon you. You’ve spent the last sixty years forging them.

Short Blog Hiatus

Comcast service is still intermittent. They tell me it’s between me and the cable office somewhere, and they’re looking.

In the mean time, I’m very busy at work so posting from there ain’t happening.

Right now I’ve got access. By the time I’m ready to post this, I may not.

[arnold voice]”I’ll be back.”[/arnold voice]

Give or take a couple of days.

More Political Cartoons!



Somehow I don’t think Mike Ramirez of the LA Times will be winning

another Pulitzer for this one. But I like it.



This one from Steve Breen of the San Diego Union-Tribune

made me laugh out loud.



Larry Wright of the Detroit News weighs in on Estrada’s withdrawal.



THAT explains it. From Henry Payne, also of the Detroit News.

And here’s one I hadn’t seen before:



In Contempt by another Kevin – Kevin Moore.

I’d say he has his finger on that particular pulse

Now, gotta get back to work.

Oh Sweet Jebus, Don’t These Blithering Morons Listen to Themselves?

From the Austrailian newspaper the Daily Telegraph comes this story of a robbery in which 34 handguns were stolen by armed bandits. The unarmed guard of the appropriately named “Obliging Security Services” was confronted by two armed men, and forced to open a safe in which the firearms were (legally) stored. Here’s the money quotes:

Police Minister John Watkins asked Commissioner Ken Moroney to suspend the licence of Obliging Security Services yesterday after the robbery was revealed in yesterday’s Daily Telegraph.

Right. They followed the rules, so it’s obviously their fault.

The company was the subject of a security audit by police in August last year and met all the requirements of the Fire Arms Act.

This wasn’t enough to keep thieves from breaking into the premises at 11.45pm.

Mr Watkins said he would be looking at changing the Act to introduce mandatory time delay locks on safes, surveillance cameras and better staffing of security offices where guns are held.

Thus making it even more expensive to stay in business, without actually affecting the real problem – violent criminals.

“If a crackdown on the security industry, or greater penalties for failing to secure weapons, puts people out of business – then they don’t deserve to be in business anyway,” Mr Watkins said.

Right! It’s the job of government officials to determine just who does and who does not deserve to be in business. That’s why they get elected, right? To tell everybody exactly what to do and how, and when things still don’t go as advertised, the elected officials get to blame the electorate for it!

“There’s two possibilities here – they didn’t follow the rules and are to blame, or they did and the rules aren’t tough enough. Whatever the case, I’m changing that from today. It’s a sad fact that there’s a growing black market in handguns.

And you’re surprised why? You had England’s sterling example to look to.

“Every gun police take off the streets makes the price of another illegal gun go up.”

You understand this, but you’re still going to blame everybody but the government and the criminals? Yup, you’re a politician. Head so firmly up your fundament that you fart to blow your nose.

I See Darwin is Still With Us or FIRE IN THE HOLE!

Man’s horror firecracker injuries

AN horrific firecracker accident which left an Illawarra man incontinent and unable to have sex has prompted warnings from police and health authorities.

The 26-year-old man suffered a fractured pelvis and severe burns to his genital area after a firecracker exploded between the cheeks of his buttocks.

An ambulance was called to Dapto’s Reed Park about 2.30am on August 10 after reports that the man was haemorrhaging from the buttocks. He was transported to Wollongong Hospital in a serious but stable condition, and he is expected to remain in hospital for several months.

The man suffered extensive injuries from the explosion and required emergency surgery. He now has a colostomy and a catheter, and is sexually dysfunctional.

He will be assessed by a colorectal surgeon to determine whether his injuries can be corrected.

Illawarra Health emergency surgeon Dr Robert McCurdie, who operated on the man when he was taken to Wollongong Hospital, likened the man’s condition to “a war injury”.

Dr McCurdie said he believed the man had stumbled while the firecracker was in his buttocks, and fell down on it.

“By virtue of the fact that the explosion was confined in an upward direction, it went up into his pelvis, blasted a great hole in the pelvis, ruptured the urethra, injured muscles in the floor of the pelvis which rendered him incontinent.

“His pelvis was also fractured,” Dr McCurdie said.

He said he had never seen a similar injury to the genital area before.

“I have seen instances … where people have tried to remove items from their rectum and rupture the sphincter muscles, but not anything like this,” he said.

It is not known whether the man had been imitating the cult prankster film Jackass, a hit in the United States.

In the low-budget film, the men place firecrackers in their buttocks and they shoot into the air.

There’s more, but you get the idea.

A bit more chlorine in the gene pool.

Dude, You’re Harshing My Mellow

Mike of Feces Flinging Monkey reports on Digital Rights Management and The End Of The Universe and I’m afraid he’s completely and totally right. Bummer quote:

Tomorrow’s computer will not be a general purpose computer like the one you have now. Currently, you can buy any sort of device that anyone cares to build – say, a device for copying CDs, or a device for scanning copyrighted works – and you can go ahead and connect it to your own computer without anybody’s permission. Tomorrow’s computer won’t work like that. Tomorrow’s computer won’t mount a device unless the device driver is digitally signed, and that signature is only available to devices that meet the standards of the signer.

I figured it was too good to last.