9/11.

This is a modified repost of last year’s 9/11 post. These images need to be remembered, not just each year, but every day: (Sorry, Peet!! These pictures shouldn’t be reduced!)





And then there was Spain:


Then London:

But in between those came Beslan:


And also Iraq:

Does anyone doubt that our enemies want to do that here? I recommend that you read Steven Den Beste’s peice, The Disunited States of America, but remember this: Disagree all you want, but when you start working for their side, don’t be surprised when the rest of us roll right over the top of you, leaving nothing but a smear.

Boy, it’s a Good Thing Nobody had a GUN!

Here’s another sad tale of “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!” And it’s another case illustrating that restraining orders are tissue paper. Our neighbor to the North had a mass killing of its own last week. Pretty much everything that could go wrong, did go wrong in this case.

First, the murderer was released from jail after attempting to severely injure or kill his wife, who was seeking a divorce. According to this story, Peter Kyun Joon Lee “deliberately drove his Land Rover into a pole on July 31, leaving his wife with a broken arm and other injuries.” As usual, the Justice legal system ground slowly on:

A judge released Lee on bail, with expectations that he would return to court to enter a plea on Sept. 12. In the interim, the judge ordered Lee not to return to his home, contact his wife or possess knives.

He didn’t, apparently, conform to any of the above.

Instead, sometime in the early-morning hours of September 5, Mr. Lee did, in fact, return home and confronted his wife, his son, and her parents. With a knife. Lee’s wife, Yong Sun Park, called 911 at approximately 3AM that morning, screaming for help. Help didn’t get there in time.

According to this story:

Greater Victoria’s 911 system suffered a failure the day of the murder-suicide in Oak Bay and rerouted a call from a screaming woman inside the home to the wrong dispatch centre.

A 911 call in any of the capital region’s 13 municipalities is supposed to be routed to the nearest emergency dispatch centre based on a database of numbers and addresses held by Telus.

However, a “database failure” hit the service on Monday and Tuesday, Telus spokesman Shawn Hall confirmed.

That meant a 911 call, made Tuesday from inside a house where five bodies were later found, was misdirected to Victoria before being transferred to Saanich, which handles Oak Bay’s calls.

“It may well have caused a delay,” said Hall. “The kind of delay would be in the magnitude of seconds or minutes. I don’t know if there was a delay.”

Honestly, at the point where she called I don’t think it would have mattered if the police had shown up in three minutes or five, but this does illustrate the futility of dialing 911 if someone really wants you dead. But the sad part is the response of the police arriving at the scene. According to this story:

Officers discovered two people dead as they entered the home.

Police then backed out of the house, called the emergency response team and evacuated six surrounding homes as a safety precaution.

It was only hours later that police searched the home and discovered three other bodies.

The first two bodies found were the parents of Yong Sun Park. If Ms. Park or her son were still alive at that time, it’s possible that emergency aid could have saved them. Or, perhaps it was simply too late by the time the police arrived. We’ll never know. The police backed out of the house when they smelled what they believed was propane, thinking that the perpetrator had barricaded himself in the home and booby-trapped it. However, they waited until 8AM to go into the house, after blowing the windows out to ventilate it.

So, who’s at fault here? Is it the justice legal system? Well, no. As I’ve demonstrated previously, the .gov cannot be responsible for any particular citizen’s safety. Is it the fault of the dispatcher? Well, there was a glitch to be sure, but I don’t think it would have gotten the police there in time. Is it the fault of the police who didn’t go in after finding the first two bodies? No, they did what they were trained to do. Getting blown up by a nut isn’t part of their job description.

No, apparently Canada’s military is at fault. (RTWT) Yes, apparently the Toronto Star, the National Post, the Vancouver Sun and the Seattle Times (not to mention the Associated Press) all jumped to the conclusion that Peter Lee had shot all of his victims because he had military training. (And that, of course, meant he was mentally unbalanced and knew how to use a gun. But I repeat myself.)

But no! Peter Lee used a knife! And not a particularly large knife, either. He used a 10-cm (approximately 4″) double-edged knife.

Apparently it’s still the fault of the military. This story states:

A Victoria knife expert, who asked to remain anonymous, told CanWest News Service that the four-inch, double-bladed knife was likely military in origin.

Lee had been a Canadian Forces navy reserve member since 1985. He held the rank of master seaman and was a certified dive inspector, trained to detect mines and other explosive devices and disarm them.

“All sailors, regular forces and reserves, all have to bring a knife on board for safety reasons,” said Sub-Lieut. Peggy Kulmala, who handles public affairs for Lee’s Victoria naval reserve detachment, HMCS Malahat. Sailors carry knives in case they fall overboard and have to cut something entangling them, she added.

HOWEVER:

There are no standard-issue military knives, and Kulmala could not say for certain whether the murder weapon described was Lee’s naval knife.

Would it have made any difference if the murder weapon was a Deba Hocho – an Asian cook’s knife? Or a freaking Ginzu? Would the media then have blamed his training as a restaurant owner? What if he’d beaten them all to death with a hockey stick?

What is with the concentration on the weapon? On the killer’s military training? Is it avoidance of the fact that regular people can kill? That the weapon doesn’t make one a killer? That military training – remember, “violent but protective” vs. “violent and predatory” – does not make people raging killbots?

What have we learned here?

People with violent pasts often work themselves up to murder.

Restraining orders, don’t.

Telling people to disarm doesn’t work.

It doesn’t matter if a killer has a gun or not.

It does matter if his victims don’t.

And, finally, “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.”

Don’t expect to hear that from the media. Or from gun control groups.

But we already knew that.

The Wal*Mart of Malfeasance: Quote of the Day.

In relation to the post below:

What is it about the DNC that attracts such sleazy flakes? Maybe they figure the price of a GOP candidate is too steep so they shop for political patronage in the Walmart of malfeasance; the DNC

Left as a comment at Small Dead Animals by “W L Mackenzie Redux”

If the Hsu Fits…

Bruce at No Looking Backwards has a wonderful slogan for Hillary’s campaign, available as a bumper sticker at his CafePress site:

Hey, Bruce! Offer that as a T-shirt, and I’ll buy one.

UPDATE: Hillary does damage control. She’ll return $850,000 to “about 260 donors” (average $3,269 per donor). Nice donors! Further:

The Clinton campaign also disclosed last night that it would begin running criminal background checks on its bundlers — the dozens of individuals who raise hundreds of thousands of dollars from donors on behalf of a candidate, as Mr. Hsu had done for Mrs. Clinton.

Boy, there’s a novel idea! I wonder why that wasn’t part of the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act?

That’s gotta hurt, but a couple of cattle-futures trades and she’ll make it right back, I’m sure.

Gigging the Paulites, (or: I Need the Traffic)

The first comment on the post where I endorsed Fred Thompson for President was from a Ron Paul supporter. Ron Paul has a fiercely dedicated (but very small) base of supporters who believe his understanding of the Constitution is the only valid one – and I’ll say up front they very well may be correct. However, as I tried to explain in those comments, Congressman Paul’s position ignores decades, nay, two centuries of political entropy, both here and abroad.

There are two quotes that I think well express the problem that the mainstream public has with Ron Paul. One is directly related to the Congressman. One is more general. From Rachel Lucas’ comments:

Like all strict libertarians, Ron Paul believes, truly believes, that he has found the Grand Unified Theory of human political relations, that all good political rules stem from a single principle that can be encapsulated in two or three sentences. He is rigidly ideological, which makes him, by definition, a zealot. Like all zealots, he thus appears to the rest of us like he is batshit crazy… because he is. The rest of us live in a far more complicated, nuanced world, where human interactions and human government cannot neatly be reduced down to a 3-sentence rule.

The other quote is by an ex-blogger, Dipnut from Isntapundit, and it’s about Ayn Rand, the inventor of the philosophy of Objectivism:

Perhaps the biggest mistake an intellectual can make is to try to parlay his one brilliant insight into a unified theory of existence. Ayn Rand made this mistake with Objectivism. Objectivism was useful for thinking in certain limited realms, but Rand sought to apply Objectivist thinking to every aspect of the human experience, including love. The result is a sterile philosophical landscape, extending out of sight in all directions. Tellingly, Rand was unable to live according to her ideals. This is part of what makes Rand so disagreeable; the almost hysterical denial of subjectivity’s inevitable, essential role in our lives. And it makes her not only disagreeable, but wrong.

I believe both Rand and Paul have important insights and have important things to say, but the extremes that both insist are necessary ignore the reality that is human existence. We are not (at least not most of us, and certainly not all of the time) rational creatures – but both the libertarian and the objectivist philosophies depend on high-percentage rationality, and so they fail.

The Geek with a .45 put it very well, also in a much older comment:

A truly enlightened society must ultimately be composed of 95%+ enlightened individuals…and the bell curve just doesn’t support that premise.

Ron Paul, if elected, could not fix anything. As I said in the Fred Thompson comment thread:

If there were 50 Ron Pauls in the Senate and 220 Ron Pauls in the House, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Unfortunately, there’s only one, and one isn’t going to accomplish anything, even if he’s President. While it would be amusing to watch him throw sand and monkey wrenches into the machinery of government from the height of the Oval Office, it’s not something I think we can afford to indulge ourselves in at present.

Most especially since we’re in a war that he thinks isolationism can get us out of.

I Didn’t Know Dylan was a Fan!.

Mr. Completely has the latest list of those who will be attending this year’s Gunblogger’s Rendezvous. Right now it looks like this:

Maj. Chuck Ziegenfuss of
From My Position… On The Way! and Project Valour-IT
Chuck is also our Guest of Honor

Fodder and the Commandress from
Ride Fast & Shoot Straight

Uncle from
Say Uncle

JimmyB and Mrs JimmyB from
The Conservative UAW Guy

KeeWee of
KeeWee’s Corner

US Citizen from
Traction Control

Chris & Mel Byrne of
The Anarchangel

Og, the
Neanderpundit

Kevin of the
Smallest Minority (That would be me.)

Dirtcrashr from
Anthroblogogy

Dave Durringer from
World Examiner

John Donovan from
Castle Arrgghhh!

Beth Donovan from
She Who Will Be Obeyed

Joe Huffman of
The View from N. Central Idaho
Boomershoot

Sebastian of
Snowflakes in Hell

Rob from
The Kitchen
(On a Blogging Break)

Larry Weeks from
Brownell’s
(Not a blog-but where would we be without Brownells?)

Mr. Completely of
Mr. Completely

“Very Likely to be There!” List:

Retired Geezer AKA ‘Doc Peabody’ &
Mrs. Geezer from
Blog Idaho

And, of course, I’ve invited JadeGold!

The deadline for getting your reservations in at the negotiated reduced room rates is next Tuesday, the 11th. The Rendezvous is from the 11th of October through the 14th, in cool, beautiful Reno, NV, but the range trip and dinner are on Saturday, the 13th. You don’t have to commit to all four days.

Bear in mind, this get-together has gotten the attention and support of Brownell’s and Natchez Shooters Supply, so there should be some nice door prizes.

And we’ve even got a music video!


Click on image to play

Quote of the Day

By Lyle in a comment at SayUncle explaining the liberal worldview:

There is no right or wrong, just the inability to get along. Therefore you must either agree with me or be accused of causing an argument.

It takes two to make a fight, so stop fighting me.

If you don’t have anything nice to say about me, you must refrain from criticizing anything I choose to do to you.

If anything I do to you makes you angry, it proves you are a hateful person.

If you cannot accept what I do to you, it means you are closed-minded.

If you don’t give me what I want, it proves you are materialistic and selfish.

Seems to meet all the tests…

Bleg.

Can someone find a transcript of Hillary’s Labor Day speech? The one where she kept talking about all the things that “we need to give” to various and diverse groups of Americans? I’ve waited several days for it to show up on her campaign site to no avail, and none of the news services seem to have transcribed it. I want to get a count of just how many times she used the word “give.”

No, really. I’m serious.

Fred Announces. (Finally)

You’ll note over on the left sidebar (as if it wasn’t long enough already) that I’ve put up an ad and a link to Fred Thompson’s campaign site.

I’ve been considering this for a while now, and since he finally decided to make it official, I finally decided to endorse him myself.

Let me be perfectly clear: Fred Thompson is not the perfect candidate. There are things about his legislative past that I don’t care for. I like what he’s been writing and saying, but I wonder if he’ll back up those words with actions in all cases if he does get elected. But I like his attitude. He has a distinctly non-politician mood, a “this is what I believe – if you don’t agree, that’s fine with me” air about him. And he’s willing to use humor – even to the point of risking offense – to make his points. I like that, too.

I cannot say the same for any of the other candidates on either side of the political aisle.

So, once again I will not be so much voting for a candidate as voting against all the rest.

Run Fred, run!

Suicide Rate Among U.S. Girls Soars

I was going to write a post about this, but Zendo Deb has gotten there first, and there is nothing much I can add. A taste:

The numbers for girls 10 to 14 is too low to draw many comparisons with.

the suicide rate for 10- to 14-year-old girls. There were 94 suicides in that age group in 2004, compared to 56 in 2003.

Although the percent increase is large (76 percent) the number is small enough relative to the population to fall under the “law of small numbers” or whatever. You really can’t reason statistically about this small a percentage of the population. The rate is less than 1 in 100,000.

Read her whole rant.

Like I said, I can’t add much to it. She hits every high-point and knocks ’em flat.