In Honor of the MA Special Election

In Honor of the MA Special Election

A Quote of the Day taken from the header at Primeval Papa, the blog of my Fearless (former) Leader:

There is something about a Republican that you can only stand him just so long; and on the other hand, there is something about a Democrat that you can’t stand him quite that long. — Will Rogers

I could not think up a more apt quotation for this day!

What Could POSSIBLY Go Worng

What Could POSSIBLY Go Worng?

Police may scrap entrance exam

The Chicago Police Department is seriously considering scrapping the police entrance exam to bolster minority hiring, save millions on test preparation and avert costly legal battles that have dogged the exam process for decades, City Hall sources said Tuesday.

If the process is opened to everyone who applies and meets the minimum education and residency requirements, Chicago would be virtually alone among major cities. Most cities have police entrance exams — and for good reason, experts say.

Then again, it’s not like the CPD doesn’t have a LOT of problems already.

Still, it is interesting to read their reasoning – “to bolster minority hiring…and avert costly legal battles….” Battles resulting, undoubtedly, from that “minority hiring” problem.

The Internet Detects Censorship as Damage . . .

The Internet Detects Censorship as Damage . . .

. . . and routes around it. From what I’ve seen, this video is getting yanked from YouTube and other sites, so I thought I’d host it until Photobucket gets pissy.

http://static.photobucket.com/player.swf?file=http://vidmg.photobucket.com/albums/v99/smallestminority/America_Rising__An_Open_Letter_to_D.flv
From what I’ve read recently 14 House Republicans, 10 House Democrats, six Senate Republicans and two Senate Democrats have announced that they will not be running for re-election. Who will be replacing them? And what about the Democrats who do run?

Of course, I’m going to repeat Ken’s comment from this post:

Yeeeeaaaaaahhhh, but the idea of hangin’ our hats on 2010/2012 puts me in mind of a comment from a post at Jaded Haven. Quoted in part: the subject of Daphne’s post “…is prepared to learn that he must leave it to Republicans to move the progressive agenda at a pace at which it can be absorbed.”

In your heart, you know he’s right.

Voting out the Democrats does not equal “taking back the country.” There’s a reason the Stupid Party is called “Democrat-Lite,” and the choice between the Evil Party and the Stupid Party a choice between castration and a wedgie.

Quote of the Day – Health Care Edition

Quote of the Day – Health Care Edition

From segment 1 of Peter Robinson’s NRO Uncommon Knowledge interview of Paul Rahe about his book Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect.

Robinson: Paul let me ask you a question. You said that President Obama’s underlying intention is to cut health care costs. Do you believe that, or do – not so much with regard to President Obama personally as to the entire political impetus behind the health care legislation – or do you believe that there actually is a statist impulse in Washington that wishes to see the State expand for the sake of State expansion? Are they simply stumbling into this mistakenly? Or do they know what they’re doing and want it?

Rahe: They know what they’re doing and they want it.

Let me see if I can put it this way. We are all in the grips of the meddling impulse. If I were to say to you that you were a busybody you might say to me “surely not.” And I would say to you “ask your children.” And everyone’s children would say that the parent is a busybody because we all feel that impulse. That is to say that we all feel that we know better than other people. (Sometimes we really do!) The more educated people become – when you give them Ph.D’s, the more expertise they have – the more you have inflated their sense of the right to interfere in the lives of other people. So the Progressive impulse goes back to the 1870’s and the 1880’s and the establishment of major research universities on the German model in the United States.

The function of these institutions is to produce people who can successfully meddle in other people’s lives.

Robinson: And in Barack Obama we have . . .

Rahe: The representative of that class. The perfect representative of that class.

This is a fascinating interview.

Another excerpt:

Rahe: (Montesquieu) comes up with a political typology into republics, monarchies and despotisms, and monarchies are governments where you have a king, but his power is limited in one fashion or another – usually by a nobility. Despotism is unlimited power, and these operate on the basis of psychological principles. What drives a despotism is terror. What drives a monarchy is the sense of honor, the love of honor that elicits a certain kind of behavior from people. What’s required in a republic is virtue. That’s hard to achieve, because you have to train people in virtue and it doesn’t come naturally or easy to us to prefer the public interest over the private interest.

No indeed. And when the system stops teaching honor and virtue? When it, in fact, denigrates them both?

Quote of the Day – Politics Edition

Quote of the Day – Politics Edition

This time from Dave Barry’s year in review: 2009:

JANUARY

. . . during which history is made in Washington, D.C., where a crowd estimated by the Congressional Estimating Office at 217 billion people gathers to watch Barack Obama be inaugurated as the first American president ever to come after George W. Bush. There is a minor glitch in the ceremony when Chief Justice John Roberts, attempting to administer the oath of office, becomes confused and instead reads the side-effect warnings for his decongestant pills, causing the new president to swear that he will consult his physician if he experiences a sudden loss of sensation in his feet. President Obama then delivers an upbeat inaugural address, ushering in a new era of cooperation, civility and bipartisanship in a galaxy far, far away. Here on Earth everything stays much the same.

The No. 1 item on the agenda is fixing the economy, so the new administration immediately sets about the daunting task of trying to nominate somebody — anybody — to a high-level government post who actually remembered to pay his or her taxes.

In humor, truth. In truth, humor!

Read the rest. It just gets better!