Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

A socialist advocates socialism because he is fully convinced that the supreme dictator of the socialist commonwealth will be reasonable from his — the individual socialist’s — point of view, that he will aim at those ends of which he — the individual socialist — fully approves, and that he will try to attain those ends by choosing means which he — the individual socialist — would also choose. Every socialist calls only that system a genuinely socialist system in which these conditions are completely fulfilled; all other brands claiming the name of socialism are counterfeit systems entirely different from true socialism. – Ludwig Von Mises, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics

(Found at Billy Beck’s.)

Thus, in one paragraph Von Mises explains why “true socialism” has apparently never been tried.

Also On the Topic of Elites

Also On the Topic of Elites

Another very good piece, also from Rational PassionMcCain Will Win – I Will Abstain. An excerpt:

For (Bill) Maher and (Sam) Harris, the Democrats fight for the little guy, peace, justice, and all good things. And if you don’t vote for them, you’re an idiot. And a narcissistic idiot for not realizing how stupid you are! You are to defer to the wisdom of your betters–people like Maher, Harris, Obama, and other left-liberals–and shut up! Why? Because you’re stupid, fool!

If this is how you view the little guy–as a bitter, narcissistic, idiot who clings to religion, guns, and xenophobia to give him comfort and security in a world without the blessings of “progressive” Democrats in charge–how can you be said to be his representative? Note that I have nothing against elitism. I have a problem with a certain kind of elitism. I have a problem with an elitist who claims to support the little guy out of one side of his mouth while sneering at his stupid Wal-Mart-shopping-gun-toting-Bible-believing ways out of the other.

Being a left-liberal elitist is not a function of one’s economic class or educational attainment per se. Being a left-liberal elitist means believing that helping the little guy is the purpose of politics and simultaneously believing that the little guy would abandon the things that he says he values if only he had a few more dollars in his pocket and a better job, thanks to left-liberal government programs. Some people, shockingly, don’t like being told that their values–right, wrong, or in-between–are symptoms of economic deprivation! Might they be? Sure. But people don’t like being told that, and if you’re going to insult them, don’t expect them to vote for you.

READ THE WHOLE THING. This includes YOU Margaret Soltan.

And here’s the Quote of the Day, from that same piece:

No, it won’t be racism that does Barack Obama in, if he does in fact lose. For every racist white who won’t vote for Obama because he’s a black man, there’s probably a guilty white liberal desperate to vote for a black person to prove how non-racist he is. I think the racial issue is a wash–it may help Obama, and it may hurt him, but on balance, it won’t be the deciding issue. I think the deeper reason for Obama’s probable defeat is something he said in his convention speech. Obama told us why John McCain won’t embrace the brilliant Obama plan of hope and change. Obama said “It’s not because John McCain doesn’t care. It’s because John McCain doesn’t get it.” That, really, is all left-liberals have. To those of us who don’t “get it,” they can offer no reason to support their candidate or their worldview. The bulk of the press, Hollywood, academia, and our cultural institutions generally–they “get it.” They “get it” so well that the need to argue for and explain their views is a skill they’ve lost. And there are a whole bunch of us who don’t “get it” and resent being told that we don’t “get it” by people who use sneers and smears to make their case instead of arguments.

I think I need to add Rational Passion to my daily reads.

Another Female’s Take

Another Female’s Take

More linkery:

I have no interest whatsoever in being a citizen of the world. The world actually sucks. In the world, having indoor plumbing and electricity are signs of disproportionate wealth. Never mind personally owned vehicular travel that is not mammal powered.

It drives me crazy when the “for the people, but not of the people” folks get their Atkins full bellies out of their Eames chairs, put down their iPhones, and take a stand from within the palatial air conditioned splendor of their fucking vacation homes.

Wealth in this country is general. The lowest common denominator has a plasma t.v. and a vehicle. Or at least knows someone closely who has one or both. Electricity is taken for granted, and it is considered suffering if one has it turned off temporarily. If the indoor plumbing is faulty, lawsuits follow. If you go anywhere else in the world, that’s not the case. Unless you hit an upside down imperialism, guilt-ridden, welfare (dhimmi tax) paradise like the U.K..

In most places in the world, there’s a trench in which everyone goes, or perhaps, more creatively, a platform off of which one can perform. Even in Europe you’re as likely to find a hole in the ground as a throne. It was about 50/50 last time I was in France. Yes, even in quite a bit of Paris.

And when the sun goes down the light is gone. Dinner is likely gruel cooked over dung. And may have included insects, on purpose. Women are stuck at home when they bleed, are quite probably beaten, even just a little as needed, and babies come too often and die almost as much. Charms are medicine, hope is a luxury, and exploitation is a step above the starvation alternative. Disease is rife, 40 is old, political unrest is daily a clear and present danger, and the idea that we put our plastic organic yogurt containers in the dishwasher before we send them to be recycled is so inconceivably wasteful of resources it cannot even be explained. – Valiens, A Brain Like Mine: Diary of a Feminist Housewife, “Palin, World, War & Kissing Girls”

Another one that’s worth your time.

Hate

Hate

Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents. It pulls and whirls the individual away from his own self, makes him oblivious of his weal and future, frees him of jealosies and self-seeking. He becomes an anonymous particle quivering with a craving to fuse and coalesce with his like into one flaming mass. (Heinrich) Heine suggests that what Christian love cannot do is effected by a common hatred.

Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without belief in a devil. Usually the strength of a mass movement is proportionate to the vividness and tangibility of its devil. When Hitler was asked whether he thought the Jew must be destroyed, he answered: “No…. We should have then to invent him. It is essential to have a tangible enemy, not merely an abstract one.” F.A. Voigt tells of a Japanese mission that arrived in Berlin in 1932 to study the National Socialist movement. Voigt asked a member of the mission what he thought of the movement. He replied: “It is magnificent. I wish we could have something like it in Japan, only we can’t, because we haven’t got any Jews.” – Eric Hoffer, True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements

Hatred is the most powerful emotion in politics. At present, American liberals are not fighting for an Obama presidency. I suspect that most have only the haziest idea of what it would mean for their country. The slogans that move their hearts and stir their souls are directed against their enemies: Bush, the neo-cons, the religious right.

In this, American liberals are no different from the politically committed the world over. David Cameron knew that he would never be Prime Minister until he had killed the urgent hatred of the Conservative party in liberal England. A measure of his success is that hardly anyone now is caught up by the once ubiquitous feeling that no compromise is too great if it stops the Tories regaining power. Hate can sell better than hope.

When a hate campaign goes wrong, however, disaster follows. And everything that could go wrong with the campaign against Palin did. American liberals forgot that the public did not know her. By the time she spoke at the Republican convention, journalists had so lowered expectations that a run-of-the-mill speech would have been enough to win the evening.

As it was, her family appeared on stage without a goitre or a club foot between them, and Palin made a fighting speech that appealed over the heads of reporters to the public we claim to represent. ‘I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion,’ she said as she deftly detached journalists from their readers and viewers. ‘I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country.’ – Nick Cohen, “When Barack’s berserkers lost the plot,” The Guardian

Quote of the Week

Quote of the Week

Forgive me, I’ve been ill. This is the first time I’ve seen this. If you haven’t, you absolutely need to read the whole thing, print it out and spread it around. Media Still Doesn’t Get It, from Ace of Spades, authored by Slublog. A masterful fisking this piece of slime by Roger Simon (no, the other Roger Simon). The quote:

You want to know why conservatives roared last night when the media was bashed and why many of us have spent the week in a simmering rage? It’s because you’re hypocrites. You claim to be objective, yet have spent the past few days absolutely smearing a woman and her family because she had the audacity to be a conservative Republican. You have expended more time and effort discussing her daughter’s sex life than you’ve spent looking into the business and political associates of the Democrat candidate for president of the United States. When you did explore Palin’s actual record, you have often done so with little regard for the truth. You and your colleagues have relinquished your right to be taken seriously as honest brokers of information.

And what this column shows me is that you know it.

I’m serious. Read the whole piece.

I can hear Bernie Goldberg saying “I told you . . .”

I wonder if anyone knows how to get in touch with Bernie. I’d bet there’s a bunch of us pajamahadeen who would like to interview him over these latest, most blatant examples of Bias and Arrogance.

And not one “legacy media” outlet that will touch him.

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

Bill Whittle strikes again:

Newt Gingrich’s fire-breathing army of young reform Republicans who stormed congress in 1994 grew, in about a decade, into the party of Duke Cunningham, Trent Lott, and the Bridge to Nowhere. I watched this unfold — especially after 2004 — and time and time again, the core conservative values of discipline and responsibility were betrayed, mocked, and ignored. Restraint is not an easy sell in a society this affluent — not compared with the view of government as a bottomless bag of candy. That’s why we’re supposed to be the party of adults.

Power corrupts, and I believe there is no power more intoxicating and corrosive than the ability to spend other people’s money at will. If Newt’s Army could go so far astray, you can bet the country was disillusioned, disappointed, and furious — not just ready for change, but eager for it, even change as ethereal and diffuse as what Senator Obama has been peddling. We lost the Senate and the House in 2006 because of this. We were going to lose the presidency in 2008 for it. And we deserved to lose it.

RTWT.

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

With regard to the way the Lenin-Red end of the intarw3bz spectrum has behaved in the last 24 hours, well, when people force themselves to be so Excruciatingly Politically Correct for 24 hours of every day, it’s shocking how misogynistic and racist they can get if you put an R after the name of a target. I haven’t seen such bigoted vitriol since the Clarence Thomas nomination.

Remember kids, it’s the hit dog that yelps. – Tam, Quote(s) of the Day

It’s called “projection.”

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

The more I think about it . . . which seriously causes the acid stomach, let me tell you . . . the more I believe the reason we haven’t lined you all up against the nearest wall is the price is just too high, and we’re too comfortable.

It won’t be that way forever, boys. – Hazel Stone at The Line is Here

Via Curtis Lowe