You Want to Be Barbarians? Let Me Get Medieval On Your Ass!

Apparently we’re not slouching towards Gomorrah, we’re skiing our way there.

The AP reports the following:

Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:32 p.m. ET

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A 16-year-old disabled girl was punched and forced to engage in videotaped sexual acts with several boys in a high school auditorium as dozens of students watched, according to witnesses.

Authorities are investigating and no charges have been filed in the alleged attack last month at Mifflin High School. Four boys suspected of involvement were sent home and have not returned to class.

Also, the principal, Regina Crenshaw, was suspended and will be fired for not calling police, school officials said. And three assistant principals were suspended and will be reassigned to other schools. Crenshaw had no comment Tuesday. The girl was forced to perform oral sex on at least two boys, according to statements from school officials, obtained by The Columbus Dispatch. Part of the alleged assault was videotaped by a student who had a camera for a school project.

School officials found the girl bleeding from the mouth. An assistant principal cautioned the girl’s father against calling 911 to avoid media attention, the statements said. The girl’s father called police.

Her father said the girl is developmentally disabled. A special education teacher said the teen has a severe speech impediment.

If I were Daddy, those four boys would never sexually assault anyone again. WALKING would require years of rehabilitation. And the “assistant principal” who “advised” not calling the police would be in need of a full set of dentures.

This is a couple of orders of magnitude worse than some 12 year-old “chavs” on a bus in London.

They want barbarism? They ought to get it.

New Member of the Blogroll.

I just added fellow Tucsonan Billy Budd’s American Dinosaur to the “Arizona Blogs” list on the blogroll. Billy’s been keeping tabs on the Minuteman Project, and he’s a member of the blog group Stop the ACLU, and gives a list of good reasons for it.

I’ll be stopping in there from time to time. I may look into joining the Stop the ACLU group myself.

For reasons of my own.

BAD AMMO WARNING!!!.

If you shoot military surplus .308 (7.62NATO) ammo, STAY AWAY FROM INDIAN SURPLUS. Excerpt:

Currently there is .308 surplus ammunition on the market made in INDIA with the headstamp OFV M80 and then a date code (usually 97), and a headstamp of KF 762b and then a date code (usually 91). From my understanding this ammunition came from the factory installed in machine gun belts. The ammunition was designed to be shot in a belt fed machine gun. A rumor is that they removed the belts/links from the ammuntion, and during the process, many of the necks got crushed, tweaked, the bullets loosened, and the bullets pressed further into the case.

Having an inquisitive nature, i figured, i would try this stuff out to see if it was as bad as everyone on the internet was saying.

Now, my initial test lot was 100 random rounds obtained by grabbing through the can after the obviously bad rounds were removed, and thrown away. I came up with 100 rounds that after a second look, showed zero signs of bad cases, crooked bullets, or anything

(O)ut of the 100 test sample rounds, i found a mixture of ball and stick powder (ball is round balls of powder, and stick looks like little sticks – two different things all together). out of 100 of the test samples, 93 had disk or ball type powder and 7 of them had stick type powder. for those not into reloading, that means they dumped whatever they had available into the cases to get them done. usually a lot of ammo is consistent in powder type. not so with the indian i had.

(A)fter weighing each powder charge inside each individual case, and charting it on paper, there was a powder variance of 6 grains between the lowest charge, and the highest charge. 6 grains of powder is an unsafe variance.

I’d say so.

The post has pictures of a blown-up CETME, a blown-up MG42 (!), and a blown-up 1919(!!).

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls; CHEAPER AIN’T ALWAYS BETTER.

Apparently this is common knowledge around the “black rifle” crowd, but it’s the first I’ve heard about it, and I thought it important enough to pass along.

Just, DAMN!.

Via Kim du Toit comes this outstanding essay on The High Road message board entitled There Are No Barbarians at the Gates. This might be vain, but I mean this sincerely: I wish I had written that. PLEASE go read it.

I did write something roughly tangent to the subject a long time ago at Themestream.com. March 7, 2001, I published Barbarians in the Village:

This week there have been not one, but two shootings on primary school campuses. Two people have died and numerous others were wounded. Both shooters were minors.

William J. Bennett was quoted once on the problem in America’s schools. “Teachers were asked in 1940”, he said, “what the three largest problems were in America’s schools. Their answer was noise, littering, and chewing gum. Teachers were asked last year (1992) what the three largest problems in America’s schools were, and the answer was assault, rape, and suicide.”

Kids have picked on and ridiculed other kids since there have been kids. Kids killing other kids is a fairly recent phenomenon, however. Is society at fault? Parents? Teachers? School administrators? Our elected representatives? The media? The kids themselves?

Yes. All of the above.

Since the 1950’s parents have increasingly relinquished their parental responsibilities to the schools, where education is no longer the goal, state supported day-care is. The schools have increasingly relinquished their responsibility to educate, and cannot maintain order and discipline under the constant threat of lawsuit. This has resulted in repeated generations of kids who receive less and less education, attention, and discipline as they grow up to become teachers, administrators, elected officials, members of the media and parents themselves, all the while concerned about themselves first and foremost. After all, nobody spent any time on them when they were kids. The hard, critical job of being a parent has now been reduced to making sure little Johnny is wearing the fashionable shoe of the week and has a brand-new chrome scooter like all of the “in” kids do.

So we have come to this – kids who kill because they’re unpopular.

I’m not accusing all parents of doing a poor job, but how many does it take to destroy the system? Just a very few. Hillary Clinton wrote a much maligned book entitled “It Takes a Village:” in which she stated that it takes that village to raise a child. I may not agree with anything else the junior Senator from New York has to say, but on that point she’s right. Whether we like it or not, the village raises our children. How much influence the village has is inversely proportional to how much influence the family has on the child. When the entire attention a child receives from his parents is clothing and material goods, the kids turn to the rest of society, our village, to tell them how to live. And our village tells them that violence is an acceptable method of solving our problems.

It took 50 years to get where we are today. The question now isn’t how do we stop it, it is can we stop it?

In another column I wrote: “We don’t live in the United States of America anymore, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. We live in `Merica, land of the free to do whatever we please, with no adverse consequences to our actions because that just wouldn’t be “fair”. Ain’t Democracy wunnerful? Let’s just vote ourselves bread and circuses and wait for the Barbarians to come over the walls.” I was referring, of course, to the fall of the Roman Empire, whose death-knell was heralded by the empire being overrun by the barbarians they used to keep at bay.

I was wrong. Our barbarians are already inside the walls. Our barbarians are us.

“Control Group,” the author of There Are No Barbarians at the Gates points out quite starkly that the barbarians have always been inside our gates. And as the post below illustrates, England seems to be re-learning this fact about now.

Perhaps the Momentum Really Has Shifted.

There have been a couple of stories lately on how the reaction to the recent “spree” shootings in Atlanta and Red Lake have resulted in unusual (from a historical perspective) reactions; a call for arming teachers and administrators by the NRA that wasn’t immediately and loudly shouted down by all “right-thinking” people, a call for allowing judges and prosecutors to carry concealed in the courtroom, etc. There was a recent editorial protesting that the “humanitarian aid” to Darfur ought to include some guns so that the people being slaughtered could defend themselves. It included this classic line:

” Darfur is one more reminder that gun control is genocide’s best friend.”

Amen.

Congress may actually pass the “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms” act this session. Nebraska may become the next “shall-issue” state. New Mexico is loosening its restrictions on CCW and looking at reciprocity, and its govenor signed the bill at the NRA’s Raton shooting facility. After four safe years of “shall-issue” concealed-carry, Michigan is looking at allowing permit holders to carry in churches, hospitals, and schools. Florida has overwhelmingly passed a “no duty to retreat” law. A Wisconsin prosecutor showed remarkable restraint in the case of an Arkansas man who defended himself with a handgun he carried, illegally, in his vehicle. He will not be charged. The op-ed includes this:

It’s not legal to carry a concealed weapon here, which many of you know because it’s become one of those debates that are rallying cries for partisan groups.

The side that wants Wisconsin to consider adopting a concealed-weapons law – which most in law enforcement oppose – can point to the Goins case as a perfect example of why it’s needed.

Because Goins possessed the determination to protect himself – and a convenient handgun under his seat – he gets to return to his family and friends in Arkansas instead of having them make a sad journey to Milwaukee to claim his remains.

The Associated Press (!) published an op-ed on concealed-carry laws that includes this line:

Violence this year – from courthouse shootings in Atlanta and Tyler, Texas, to the school killings at Red Lake, Minn., the most deadly since Columbine – has spurred something far different: that if the victims had weapons, they might not be victims.

Mr. V.O. Goins of Arkansas can attest to that fact.

This is not to say that gun control activists have rolled up their carpets and gone home. Hardly, but it’s surprising (at least to me) to see so much support in the media and in the legislatures finally. It appears that the public is finally waking up and getting vocal, and the gun-controllers are getting desperate.

Now Arizona’s govenor, Janet Napolitano, has signed legislation that will allow an elective gun safety class for public schools, that includes actual range time and familiarization with .22 rifles!

Will wonders never cease?

Words of wisdom, however: “Don’t get cocky!”

And don’t let up.

Randy Barnett on Joyce Foundation Funding

I mentioned this last week, when David Hardy picked up on Professor Saul Cornell’s contribution to a Fordham University Law Review symposium, funded (of course) by the Joyce Foundation. Well, Professor Barnett commented at the Volokh Conspiracy on the similar symposium published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review in 2000. One zinger of a quote from Prof. Barnett:

Is accepting honoraria from a foundation, like the Joyce Foundation, that will support only one side of an issue unethical? So long as one does not change one’s views to conform to the funding source’s preferences, I do not think so (though I do think one should disclose one’s funding sources to allow readers to evaluate for themselves whatever impact it may have on one’s analysis). I do not see why foundations who wish to advance a particular view cannot ethically support the research of those who otherwise agree with its agenda. Ultimately, the soundness of one’s scholarship should depend on the reasons and evidence one puts forth, not the source of any financial support one may have received. I think this is true even if the honoraria induced a scholar to write about an issue he or she would not otherwise have done, which I think probably applies to a number of contributors to the Second Amendment symposium. I feel the same way about campaign contributions. Contributing money to the campaign of politicians with whom one agrees does not corrupt the politician, unless he or she was already corrupt. Michael Bellesiles, who was paid to contribute to the Chicago-Kent symposium did not fabricate his evidence because the Joyce Foundation was paying him. He was a corrupt scholar before and after this payment was made.

So refreshing when someone is willing to call a spade a spade and not a “human operated soil relocation device.”

Read Prof. Barnett’s whole piece.

UPDATE, 4/14: Saul Cornell does it again, and Randy Barnett doesn’t let him get away with it. Here’s a key piece:

Saul asked in his reply: “Given that the gun lobby has plenty of money and places like CATO are strongly gun rights it seems a bit unfair to ask Joyce to fund your point of view.” I do not expect Joyce to fund any point of view with which they disagree. It is not Joyce we are talking about, it is Chicago-Kent and Ohio State. Nor, to reiterate, do I have any problem with an individual scholar like Saul who agrees with Joyce accepting funding to support his or her academic research, provided the funding is disclosed. But Ohio State, like Chicago-Kent, is an academic institution, unlike Cato, or the Federalist Society. (I raised the Federalist Society because, even though it is not an academic institution, its programs have more balance than did Chicago-Kent’s. (I did not compare the Fordham Law Review symposium to the Federalist Society—indeed, I did not mention that symposium at all in my post.)

Let me clarify this by posing the following question: Why did Joyce not organize its own conference, law review issue, or Second Amendment Research Center? The answer is plain: it wants its views to enjoy the academic respectability imparted upon it by the imprimatur of Chicago-Kent and Ohio State. It is that institutional imprimatur that enabled the Ninth Circuit to rely so heavily on articles published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review in his opinion in Silveira v. Lockyer. (BTW, the published opinion had to be modified later to remove its reliance on the discredited work of Michael Bellesiles.) This is what Joyce is buying from Chicago-Kent and Ohio State. This is what it is improper of these institutions to sell.

I’ve got a bit more to say here.

Quote of the Week.

Via Instapundit comes an interesting story of in-sourcing – importing Turkish tailors to hand-craft suits, a skill largely lost here. But here’s the quote of the week:

“It’s hard to leave home,” says Aydin Olcum, 36, one of the company’s Turkish master tailors. “But now the world has changed. You’re not supposed to live where you’re born. You’re supposed to live where you can feed your family.”

On the Question of Rights.

Just to let you know, Dr. Cline emailed me yesterday with the latest update in this ongoing saga. It’s about four and a half pages in Word document form. I’m reading and re-reading and digesting it now. Expect a reply post some time later this week.

I think we’re nearing the end of the discussion. We’re going to reach some accomodation, I think, and agree to disagree on the rest.

For anyone wondering what the hell I’m talking about, read these, in consecutive order. (Fix a BIG bowl of popcorn and your favorite soft drink prior to starting. Hard liquor is only justified when you get to the fifth installment.)

What is a “Right”?


What is a “Right”? Revisited, Part I

What is a “Right”? Revisited, Part II

Rights, Morality, Idealism & Pragmatism, Part I

Rights, Morality, Pragmatism & Idealism, Part II

As before, I’ll post Dr. Cline’s reply and then my response as separate posts, one above the other.

(No, really! It’s fun!)(To a point.)

Will Nebraska Be Next?.

Maybe! The Omaha World-Herald is reporting that State Sen. Jeanne Combs is making a pretty damned good run at it:

Guns a part of life for state senator

BY LESLIE REED
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN – She has a .38, and she knows how to shoot it.

State Sen. Jeanne Combs believes she can accomplish what three male lawmakers in 10 years before her could not: to persuade the Nebraska Legislature to authorize carrying concealed handguns.

A nurse at the Farmland Foods meatpacking plant in Crete, Combs is a down-home woman with roots in Kentucky and the mill towns of Ohio.

Now 49, she grew up around hunting and often ate squirrel for supper at her Grandma Della Hacker’s home in Kentucky’s Clay County.

She came to believe that people couldn’t count on police for protection after her home was burglarized – twice – while living in Southern California.

Amazing, isn’t it, that exposure to the reality that the government can’t be responsible for one’s safety tends to make one appreciate the right to arms?

She purchased her stainless steel Smith & Wesson revolver when she was a home health-care and hospice nurse in Jackson County, Ky., 11 years ago.

She felt she needed it for protection as she traveled alone, often at night, visiting patients along backroads and in the hollers around Daniel Boone National Forest.

“I never had to use it, I just had it with me,” she said. “It was in my black bag, with my stethoscope and my blood pressure cuff. It was right in the bottom, in a little snap pocket.”

She drove up to 100 miles to visit dying patients and people suffering from injuries or chronic disease. Most qualified for government health assistance and few had indoor plumbing.

“In that culture, everyone has a gun,” she said. “They carry them clipped to their belt, like people around here do a Vise-Grip.”

I think she meant a Leatherman, but you get the idea.

Was she carrying the gun legally? “I don’t know,” she said.

Actually, she wasn’t.

Since moving to Nebraska nine years ago, Combs has stored her gun in a locked box in a closet. She’s no longer in a job where she feels she needs a firearm. Until recently, she hadn’t gotten the pistol out for more than a year.

But if she needed it, Combs said, she’d like to be able to legally stow it in her purse or glove compartment. In Nebraska, she said, it’s not socially acceptable – though it’s legal – to carry a gun in the open.

“I’d be the talk of the town to walk around with a gun on my hip,” she said.

Lawmakers are expected to soon begin debating Combs’ proposal, Legislative Bill 454, perhaps as early as this week.

This weekend, she planned to attend three days of handgun training at Front Sight Resort in Nevada, described on its Web site as the “World’s Premier Resort for Self Defense and Personal Safety Training.”

The training, which normally costs $900, is being provided by the Michigan Legislative Sportsmen’s Foundation. Combs is a member of the Nebraska Sportsmen’s Foundation.

The Front Sight course is accepted for concealed-handgun permits in 23 states. Combs wants to be able to describe, first-hand, the training typically required for obtaining a concealed-weapon permit.

Coverage of THAT would be fascinating! So you can bet no one will.

Combs learned to shoot using her father’s and brother’s guns while growing up in New Miami, Ohio. Her father, a ninth-generation resident of Clay County, Ky., moved to Ohio after World War II to find work. He died when Combs was 14.

Her mother was the daughter of Sicilian immigrants who grew and sold vegetables and plants in Hamilton, Ohio.

After earning a nursing degree from Miami University of Ohio, Combs moved to California with her first husband and young daughter in 1980. She worked as director of nursing for a retirement community.

While living in Riverside, Calif., her housing development became caught up in a turf war between two gangs, she said. On her days off she rode her bike around the neighborhood to cover gang graffiti with spray paint.

Doesn’t that job come with combat pay?

The second time her home was burglarized, she said, police were slow to arrive. A suspect was arrested only because a neighbor got his license plate number. He was sentenced to three years in prison, but court officials warned her he could be released well before that.

You don’t say. And the subtext: “You’ll be on your own, in that case.”

Later she moved to Kentucky, and in 1995 to Friend, Neb., with her second husband, Ronald Combs, whom she recently divorced.

She now lives in Milligan in a home near her mother and stepfather, Shirley and Bill Lewis. They fell in love with Nebraska after attending her 2000 graduation from Concordia University in Seward with a degree in health care administration.

Combs compares her handgun to seat belts or a fire extinguisher.

“You want to be prepared,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you’re living in fear. You want to take a practical approach to living in safety.”

Senator Combs is, of course, a Republican.

Good luck, Ms. Combs. Good luck, Nebraska.

If you want to help, copy and paste the link to the Omaha World-Herald’s front page, http://www.omaha.com, for their current poll question, “Do you agree with a Nebraska state senator’s efforts to authorize the carrying of concealed weapons in the state?” At the time of this writing the poll is running 3124 “Yes,” 1594 “No,” 99 “Undecided,” and 26 “I have no opinion (but I’m willing to click on the survey anyway.)”

UPDATE 4/13: From the Heartland reports that things look good.

Range Report!

I finally got out to the range today. It was a bit windy the last few days here, and I wanted to test my .223 handloads at 300 meters, so I put it off until this morning. Absolutely perfect morning to go shooting. I didn’t have sight settings for 300m, so I stapled up a bunch of sight-in targets and picked the target in the middle. After the first five rounds it was obvious that I was hitting VERY low, so I dialed in a few minutes of elevation, and like a moron I picked a HIGHER target for the second go-around. Five more shots, but I couldn’t see the impact points through my 45x not-so-great quality spotting scope, so I hopped in the truck (I had the 500m range ALL TO MYSELF!) and drove down.

Good news: A beautiful 2″ (4-shot) group! (Best group of the day, as a matter of fact.)

Bad news: Right through the top crossbrace of the target frame. My range charges $1 per hole in the target frame. I know it was a 2″ group because the frame is made of 2×2’s. I figure the fifth shot went just a bit high.

So now I know my sight settings for 300, 385, and 500 meters with that load, (75 grain Hornady BTHP) and it shoots about 1.5-2MOA at 300 meters which is, realistically, about as well as I can see at that range through a 10X scope.

I also took out my freshly restocked 1943-era M1 Garand and my .50 caliber ammo can full of Korean surplus ammo in clips on bandoleers. After a bit of sight tweaking, I was able to consistently drop the steel pig silhouettes with that combo, shooting off sandbags. Iron sights!

After a hundred and fifty rounds of .223 and probably ten or twelve clips or so of .30-06 (it’s so much fun, who’s counting?), it was starting to warm up and get windy, so I shifted down to the Law Enforcement range for a little pistol practice. The new S&W 60-14 I picked up on Saturday is a SHOOTER! This is the first revolver I’ve ever been able to shoot halfway decently double-action. At seven yards I was able to keep all five 125 grain Federal .38 Nyclads in the chest just as fast as I could pull the trigger. I even practiced double-taps and was able to get the two rounds with 2-3″ of each other. I’m quite impressed with this little revolver. The hi-viz fiberoptic front sight is definitely a plus. It’s VERY easy to pick up and makes follow-up shots much faster.

What a great day at the range. I’ve got to do this more often.

Edited to add:

I forgot to mention, I tested out my two free MWG Co. magazines, a 10-rounder and a 5-rounder. Each held the advertised capacity and no more. Each was a bit of a tight fit in the mag well, but I’d imagine they’ll wear in. Each fed properly.

Except the last round. Both mags. Repeatedly. The last round out would jam. I don’t know if the problem is with the follower or what, but I’d be interested to know if anyone else has had this problem with theirs.