Quote of the Day – Media and Education Edition

It’s not just crappy education [although that certainly contributes], it’s that most ‘reporters’ study ‘journalism’ in college, where they’re taught not to ‘report’ facts and such but to ‘describe’ and ‘explain’ ‘narratives’ and ‘messages’ to the ignorant public. They are to become ‘journalists’, which apparently means they don’t really need to know anything except how to string together words to make a sentence. And they don’t need to understand anything at all.

The journalism majors I get in my class are second worst, only better than the education majors.

Posted by: JorgXMcKie at January 6, 2011 10:21 AM

Found at Arms and the Law, Media ignores ATF internal scandals

To Quote the Eminently Quotable Tamara K,

This would make me want to get my wookie on. This would make me want to saddle up and bust caps. If the .gov was wondering what it would take to turn me into a wild-eyed militia kook, well, they’ve found it.

She said this about the EPA looking at banning traditional lead ammunition, and I agreed with her then.  I was reminded of that quotation when I read that European governments have started seizing private pension funds. Argentina did it a while ago.

There have been noises here about Congress looking longingly and lovingly at all of the money tied up in 401(k) retirement accounts. You see, the crash of the stock market proves that allowing people to control their own retirement accounts is just, well, foolish. We’d be much better off if we gave that money to the government for them to dole out to us in our old age like we do with Social Security.

Oh, wait…

So you want to seize my 401(k) funds? My wookie suit is fresh back from the cleaners, and I just cleaned the bowcaster.

Boomershoot!

I watched the Outdoor Channel’s Shooting Gallery episode last night on Joe Huffman’s Boomershoot.  Except for host Michael Bane using the dreaded word “Tannerite,” the show was excellent.  (No footage of Joe’s daughter Kim, though.)  And we got to see David Whitewolf of Random Nuclear Strikes with his long-range specialty pistols.  I’ve shot some of Dave’s guns, and that inspired me to get The Power Tool™ that I took, along with my Remington 700 5R, to Boomershoot 2009.  I got a Boomer with it, too!  (And scared the hell out of several more.)

Legal Not-So-Minutiae

I’ve seen in the last few days a couple of news pieces that give me heartburn. As I’ve stated before, in studying the legal history of gun control in depth, I’ve read a lot of legal decisions and analysis of those decisions, and I’ve read a lot of law. I am convinced that Rick Cook was on to something when he said:

The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want. But your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it.

It’s worse when our congresscritters pass laws without knowing what’s in them in the first place. Add to that a Court system that, in the words of 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski:

The needs of law enforcement, to which my colleagues seem inclined to refuse nothing, are quickly making personal privacy a distant memory. 1984 may have come a bit later than predicted, but it’s here at last.

The first story comes from California’s Supreme Court in the case of People v. Diaz where:

We granted review in this case to decide whether the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution permits law enforcement officers, approximately 90 minutes after lawfully arresting a suspect and transporting him to a detention facility, to conduct a warrantless search of the text message folder of a cell phone they take from his person after the arrest. We hold that, under the United States Supreme Court’s binding precedent, such a search is valid as being incident to a lawful custodial arrest. We affirm the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

The Court’s reasoning is given:

One of the specifically established exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is “a search incident to lawful arrest.” (United States v. Robinson (1973) 414 U.S. 218, 224 (Robinson).) This exception “has traditionally been justified by the reasonableness of searching for weapons, instruments of escape, and evidence of crime when a person is taken into official custody and lawfully detained.” (United States v. Edwards (1974) 415 U.S. 800, 802-803 (Edwards).) As the high court has explained: “When a custodial arrest is made, there is always some danger that the person arrested may seek to use a weapon, or that evidence may be concealed or destroyed. To safeguard himself and others, and to prevent the loss of evidence, it has been held reasonable for the arresting officer to conduct a prompt, warrantless search of the arrestee’s person and the area ‘within his immediate control’ . . . .” Such searches may be conducted without a warrant, and they may also be made whether or not there is probable cause to believe that the person arrested may have a weapon or is about to destroy evidence. The potential dangers lurking in all custodial arrests make warrantless searches of items within the “immediate control” area reasonable without requiring the arresting officer to calculate the probability that weapons or destructible evidence may be involved.

However, here’s what the dissent to that decision said:

The majority concludes police may search the data stored on an arrestee’s mobile phone without a warrant, as they may search clothing or small physical containers such as a crumpled cigarette package taken from the person of an arrestee. In my view, electronic communication and data storage devices carried on the person — cellular phones, smartphones and handheld computers — are not sufficiently analogous to the clothing considered in Edwards or the crumpled cigarette package in Robinson to justify a blanket exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. A particular context-dependent balancing of constitutionally protected privacy interests against the police interests in safety and preservation of evidence led the United States Supreme Court, over 30 years ago, to hold searches of the arrestee’s person reasonable despite the lack of probable cause or a warrant and despite substantial delay between the arrest and the search. Today, in the very different context of mobile phones and related devices, that balance must be newly evaluated.

The potential intrusion on informational privacy involved in a police search of a person’s mobile phone, smartphone or handheld computer is unique among searches of an arrestee’s person and effects. A contemporary smartphone can hold hundreds or thousands of messages, photographs, videos, maps, contacts, financial records, memoranda and other documents, as well as records of the user’s telephone calls and Web browsing. Never before has it been possible to carry so much personal or business information in one’s pocket or purse. The potential impairment to privacy if arrestees’ mobile phones and handheld computers are treated like clothing or cigarette packages, fully searchable without probable cause or a warrant, is correspondingly great.

The case from which I took Chief Judge Kozinski’s “1984” quote was one in which law enforcement officers, without a warrant, attached a GPS tracking device to a suspect’s vehicle to record his every movement. The 9th Circuit said that was just fine. Now the California Supreme Court says that if the police want to dig through the hard drive on your laptop, all they need is to “lawfully arrest” you for any viable infraction of the law. If your laptop is with you, it’s fair game, even though had you left it at home, they’d need a warrant.

In an earlier case, Judge Kozinski wrote:

Judges know very well how to read the Constitution broadly when they are sympathetic to the right being asserted. We have held, without much ado, that “speech, or…the press” also means the Internet…and that “persons, houses, papers, and effects” also means public telephone booths….When a particular right comports especially well with our notions of good social policy, we build magnificent legal edifices on elliptical constitutional phrases – or even the white spaces between lines of constitutional text. But, as the panel amply demonstrates, when we’re none too keen on a particular constitutional guarantee, we can be equally ingenious in burying language that is incontrovertibly there.

It is wrong to use some constitutional provisions as springboards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us. As guardians of the Constitution, we must be consistent in interpreting its provisions. If we adopt a jurisprudence sympathetic to individual rights, we must give broad compass to all constitutional provisions that protect individuals from tyranny. If we take a more statist approach, we must give all such provisions narrow scope. Expanding some to gargantuan proportions while discarding others like a crumpled gum wrapper is not faithfully applying the Constitution; it’s using our power as federal judges to constitutionalize our personal preferences.

I’d say they’ve made their decision, and that decision is statist.

Some members of the Left have been taking exception to the incoming Congressional Republican decision to read the Constitution on the floor of the House of Representatives tomorrow, and to pass a rule to require bills to cite their basis in the Constitution. What the Left objects to is the fact that the Right understands that the purpose of the Constitution was not only to establish the federal government, but to limit it, and protect the rights of The People. A Liberal Supreme Court “discovered” a right to privacy in the “penubras formed by emanations” from the guarantees in the Bill of Rights in Griswold v. Connecticut back in 1965.  

But not, apparently, if you’re “lawfully arrested.” Or just driving around in your own car. I guess they’ve seen the error of their ways.

The second story is, on the surface, much less weighty. Actor and former TV host Gary Collins was arrested for walking out of a restaurant without paying. (I wonder if they searched his cell phone?) But here’s the part that grabbed my attention:

Cops quickly caught up with Collins and took him into custody on charges of defrauding an innkeeper, which happens to be a felony since the amount of the check was over $25.

A felony.

A FELONY.

According to Dictionary.com, a felony is defined as:

an offense, as murder or burglary, of graver character than those called misdemeanors, esp. those commonly punished in the U.S. by imprisonment for more than a year.

The man walked out on a restaurant tab. And why am I so bent about this? Because of one of those laws that was passed that apparently nobody read, but that will be enforced by your worst enemy: USC Title 18, Section 922(g)(1):

It shall be unlawful for any person … who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year … to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

Walk out on a restaurant bill, lose your right to arms forever.

Does this make any sense to you?

Bowling Pin Match, Sunday January 9

Tucson Rifle Club action range. Registration begins at 8:30 AM (we’re starting a little later). Sign in at the range office, but if all you’re going to do is shoot the match, you don’t need to pay the daily use range fee – it’s part of the match entry fee for non-members. $10 for the first gun, $5 each for additional guns. First round downrange (hopefully) by about 9:00.

We’re going to shoot Major (.40 and above), Minor (9mm and below), and .22 rimfire as separate classes, in a double-double-elimination (best two-out-of-three against a competitor, lose against two competitors and you’re done – at least in that division – for the day.)

Smallest centerfire allowed: .38 Special. Hollowpoint and flat-point bullets work better at carrying pins off the tables than round-nose or FMJ bullets do, regardless of caliber.

You’ll be paired off against other shooters in your division for head-to-head competition, again, best 2 out of 3 wins the match. Bring enough ammo! Most tables take way over five shots. Even if you lose the match, you can keep shooting until you’ve cleared your table if you want to. Consider it practice for the next round.

Whoever is left with after elimination will be declared victor of the division. The last match of the day will be a best two-out-of-three competition between the top Major and Minor shooters. Your only prize: the accolades of your peers.

Everyone who hangs around until the end of the shoot will be put in for a drawing. $1 of each entry goes into a pot. A drawing from the names of those present will be taken, and the winner gets the whole pot. Last month it was over $40, so you get your entry fee back, and a little gas money.

See you Sunday, January 9!

More Balkanization

I’ve written here at TSM previously on the Tucson Unified School District’s “Ethnic Studies” program, or “Raza Studies” as it’s known hereabouts. It’s been a crusade by the current and outgoing Superintendent of Public Instruction to eliminate this program from Tucson’s schools. Said Superintendent is outgoing because he was recently elected to the position of Attorney General. And he’s serious:

In his final hours as Arizona schools chief, Tom Horne is planning to make a declaration this morning that TUSD’s ethnic studies program is in violation of state law.

For Horne, who has held the post for the last eight years and will be sworn in as the state’s attorney general at noon, the only way the district can come into compliance will be complete elimination of the Mexican American Studies program.

“In view of the long history regarding that program, the violations are deeply rooted in the program itself, and partial adjustments will not constitute compliance,” Horne wrote in a 10-page document of findings.

Failure to comply could result in the loss of up to 10 percent of the district’s budget. The Tucson Unified School District’s annual state-aid budget is more than $149 million. If a 10 percent reduction is imposed, that amounts to an annual loss of nearly $15 million, according to the Arizona Department of Education.

Note that, for the benefit of TUSD graduates and dropouts, the paper kindly did the “10% of X = Y” math for them.

At least the ones who can read.

RTWT.

The TSM 2010 Retrospective

This has become an annual tradition. I started doing it in 2007, so this will be my fourth look back over the previous year.

In January the Quote of the Month came the very first day:

I made it to 2010 and all I got from the SF books of my youth is the lousy dystopian government.perlhaqr

You can still get it on a T-shirt.  I got mine last year.

Being still unemployed (laid off December 7 of 2009), I did manage to pen an Überpost that month:  What We Got Here Is . . . Failure to Communicate, a multi-thousand word book report on Thomas Sowell’s magnum opus A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles, using examples from the comments at TSM to illustrate Sowell’s sagacity.

Then I got a new job.

February’s Quote of the Month came in response to Audi’s “Green Police” Superbowl TV ad. You’ll just have to click on the link for that one. No Überpost that month, though. I was getting up to speed at my new place of employment.

March brought us the oral arguments in McDonald v. Chicago, and an interesting transcript of them. Alan Gura once again proves why he’s the man when it comes to arguing before the Supremes when he lays down the smackage on the Wise Latina:

Justice Sotomayor, States may have grown accustomed to violating the rights of American citizens, but that does not bootstrap those violations into something that is constitutional.

If there were any real justice in this world, that would have left a scar. That later became Quote of the Day, and is the Quote of the Month for March. My new job sent me to Chicago that month for a service call, and I had a pleasant dinner with a reader at Ditka’s while I was there. Also in March we learned that the federal Department of Education apparently has a bunch of Remington 870 short-barreled shotguns with ghost-ring sights, and Knoxx stocks, as they went out to purchase an additional 27 units. I guess you need that kind of firepower to deal with the teachers unions unruly students parents.

The HVAC unit on my roof died early in the month. Well, the heat exchanger in the gas heater did. I finally got THAT paid off a couple of months ago. Word of advice: pass on Goodman products. I replaced it with a Trane.

Also in March I commented on Al Gore’s Feb. op-ed We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change wherein he stated that “From the standpoint of governance, what is at stake is our ability to use the rule of law as an instrument of human redemption.”

Redemption.

REDEMPTION.

When someone sees government as a means to human redemption I want them kept as far from the levers of power as is possible. I had a bit more to say on the subject a couple of days later.

March was also the month that Congress overcame all protest and passed the 2,000+ page “Health Care Reform” bill.  Lots of posts about that, but boiled down to a soundbite by Representative Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan’s 11th District in this pithy observation:

The Democratic Party believes that you can take an imperfect health-care system and fix it by putting it under the most dysfunctional and broken entity in the United States today: It’s called the Federal Government.

That proposition is insane.

And if a picture is worth a thousand words, this one sums it all up:


No Überpost this month either, just a lot of linky and not a lot of thinky. I left that to others.

April started off no better. However, April brought a surprise – Arizona became the third state in the nation with “Constitutional Carry.” Permitless legal concealed-carry legislation passed and the governor signed the bill.

I started running a monthly bowling-pin match at my local range in April. All those people carrying really ought to be able to hit a bowling pin at 25 feet, don’t you think?

Supreme Court Justice Stevens announced his retirement in April, prompting me to quote Justice Scalia at some length concerning the “Living Constitution” question. Not an Überpost, but an important topic, I think.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed another bill in April, SB1070, which drew a little attention from the media all the way to the White House. Not being a fan of government in general, I was a bit skeptical of the law to begin with, but it pissed so many of the right people off, I warmed to it later.

I did manage a baby-Überpost on the topic of the education system: Dept. of Our Collapsing Schools – Twofer Edition, discussing how ill prepared high-school graduates are for college, and a story about how a “model school” run by Stanford education professors performed about how you’d expect a school run by “education experts” to perform. It failed. While just down the street, another school teaching kids from the same demographic is succeeding. Why? Read the piece, if you haven’t.

Finally, in November of 2009 the HaloScan commenting system I had been using since 2003 switched to Echo. By the end of April it was quite apparent that Echo was NOT popular with my readers, but I had almost seven years worth of comments, and I didn’t want to lose them in switching to another system, as Echo’s export function didn’t seem to import to any other service. More on this later in the year.

May began with Victims of Communism Day, something I think I’ll repeat annually. Short and to the point.

I ran my second bowling pin match on Mother’s Day of all days. Turnout was, as you’d expect, light.

On the 10th, SayUncle and Xlrq pointed to a website, Momlogic, spreading more made-up scaaary numbers about. In short, they lied about the number of accidental deaths of children, and when called on it, neither apologized nor retracted.

The blog turned seven years old in May, so I indulged in a review of some of the ego-inflating things that have been said about it and me. Thanks, y’all!

I spent some time down in central Mexico in May, which cut into my internet access terribly. The hotel had Wifi, but it was at dial-up speeds. There was access on the job site, but it was heavily firewalled, and I had actual, you know, work to do. Posting was light, to say the least.

There was one significant post for the month, though. They say the internet never forgets anything, and video of Milton Friedman is one thing I’m very glad will remain available to all. I put up a short clip I saw at Bill Whittle’s, with some commentary in Intentions and Results.

June? June was gooood. The rifle I’d waited almost eighteen months for finally arrived. My Ted Brown-built LRB M25 arrived at my doorstep June 1 at 10AM. It has both a bayonet lug and the shoulder-thing that goes up. I think it made Sarah Brady cry. And Paul Helmke wet himself.

On June 2 over in (formerly) Great Britain, a taxi driver who was licensed to possess two shotguns and a .22 rifle used one shotgun and the rifle to go on a three and a half hour shooting spree in Cumbria, killing twelve people and wounding 25, according to early reports. I had something to say about that.

It was also shortly after this that I promised an Überpost to James Kelly of Scotland. Promises, promises . . .

Also in June, the Los Angeles chapter of the NAACP proved that they need to study astrophysics a little bit more.

I did manage a real Überpost in June, though. Sort of. I recycled an older post with some updates reflecting the Supreme Court decisions in D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago with Cut-‘n-Paste. And the Quote of the Month came out of the reaction to the McDonald decision.

By July it was fairly obvious that I wasn’t holding up my end of the blogging bargain too well in 2010. Lots of linky, not as much thinky. So I linked to the best blog post and comment thread evar, in For Your Reading Entertainment. Still, TSM received its two-millionth recorded site visit shortly thereafter.

And in July, the fourth monthly bowling pin shoot started to show signs of promise.

July brought us a brilliant essay from Angelo Codevilla that he turned into a book. I made several excerpts Quotes of the Day, and now I make this one Quote of the Month. The JournoList scandal broke in July, and I managed to work it into a short piece in relation to Professor Codevilla’s essay.

By early August it was apparent that something was happening in American politics that was not business-as-usual. I wrote But What if Your Loyalty is to the Constitution? – Part III about that.

I discovered in August that one of my technical dissertations is now linked by a University as a reference. Pretty cool.

Then I fisked a high school valedictorian’s graduation speech. I think she is a victim of “critical pedagogy.” She certainly used all the right buzzwords. And a couple of days later, I got a further example of just how far our “education” system has fallen, and another. And then an illustration of part of the problem. GIGO.

In good news, I finally understand the gublogosphere’s universal praise of author Terry Pratchett. Another series I have to go buy the whole of.

August’s Quote of the Month came from a different book, however: Colin Ferguson’s American On Purpose.

And now we get back to that comment saga. By August, Echo’s intermittent troubles seemed to have smoothed out somewhat. I put up a little throwaway post, My New Favorite Flag, and it drew the most comments of any post in the history of TSM. Don’t bother looking. I’ll get back to that.

On Sept. 1 my doctor called me at work and said “Mr. Baker, you’re diabetic.” Oh. Joy. After changing my diet and checking my blood glucose level religiously for the last four months, I conclude that I’m more “glucose intolerant” than full-blown diabetic. I can control my blood sugar without medication, and I’m (slowly) losing weight. No porphyria attacks, either.

Remember that Überpost I promised James Kelly I’d write back in June? Well, I promised again that I’d have it up in early September. I lied.

September also brought the fifth annual Gun Blogger’s Rendezvous in Reno, Nevada. I’ve been to ’em all. The 2010 edition brought more people and more sponsors than ever, and I wrote a post to thank all the sponsors for the great swag they gave us. I finally got a few pictures posted after I got home.

That comment thread from back in August? By mid-September it had gone over 500 comments. Mostly really good. One of those comments linked to a piece that gave us the Quote of the Month for September. In a bit of prescience, I saved one entire comment from that thread by reader Moshe Ben-David and made it a post of its own. Interestingly, Markadelphia hasn’t left a comment at TSM since that überthread. And no, I didn’t ban him.

In serious news, the Voting Section Chief of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division defied his bosses and testified before Congress on the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case. The media barely mentioned it. But Stephen Colbert testifying about illegal immigration? THAT got coverage!

And in late September I discovered that I dislike Cass Sunstein very much.

And finally, more evidence (as if you needed it) of the dumbing-down of our education system.

In October, the “Green Movement” unmasked itself fully and completely with a single television ad: “No Pressure.” They thought it would be funny. I had a bit more to say on it later. And from the comments to that latter piece, October’s Quote of the Month.

Sandwiched between those, though, I wrote a short piece on Reality Capitalism TV. I have to wonder how much of that praise of capitalism is intentional and how much accidental.

In October a Tennessee fire department declined to respond to a structure fire for a resident who had not paid his service fee. They did, however, respond to his neighbor, to prevent the fire from spreading to his home. The result, one home burned to the ground, and some dead pets.

The outrage was immediate and vociferous, and the denunciation of “Libertarianism” was immediate. I had, of course, something to say about that, too.

Also in October we got to see what the .gov really thinks of us (again) when it comes to warrantless surveillance. As Judge Kozinski said, “1984 may have come a bit later than predicted, but it’s here at last.”

Bill Whittle started his own film production company, and began cranking out short videos, the first of which are his “What We Believe” series. Part I came out very early in October.

In the ongoing Global Warming Cooling Climate Change debate, a respected scientist wrote a resignation letter to the American Physical Society over the topic, stating “This is not science; other forces are at work.” Worth a read, or a re-read.

The bowling pin matches continued in October. Fourteen people showed up! We had a good time, and I had a short video clip.

A local anti-gun bigot posted a couple of rants about open carry in Arizona that made the rounds of the gunblogosphere. I, of course, put my 2¢ in. No reply, though.

The pernicious idea that government should parent us was brought up again in a USAToday letter to the editor. I objected. Again. Of course they’re not our parents. They’re Our Neocortical Overlords. And at best, they’re not adults, but grown-ups. (I may not be writing überposts, but string two or three of these together, and you get the same word-count.)

I shot my first GLOCK Sport Shooting Foundation match in October. Single most expensive match I’ve ever shot, and I did it with a borrowed gun. My feelings on Glocks remain the same: Meh.

As October drew to a close and we prepared for the November elections, I wrote a post on the mindset of The Other Side™, ably represented by one Joan Peterson. AKA “japete.” Ms. Peterson is a board member of the Brady Campaign and blogger who had, by that time, become the darling of the gunblogging set for her complete disconnect from reality to the point she got her condition named for her: Peterson Syndrome. And I applied that diagnosis to another worthy member of The Other Side™.

And finally, the media once again acted in its role as clergy in the Church of State to keep the lay-people in line when it declared that Jon Stewart’s October rally on the D.C. mall was bigger, much bigger, than the “Restoring Honor” rally held by Glenn Beck the month previous. But it wasn’t, of course.

The election came and went, and a promise made after the passage of Obamacare was kept. Not that anybody in the political class took much notice.

Together with ExurbanKevin, we held the second annual Southern/Central Arizona Blogshoot at the Elsy Pearson Public Shooting Range in Casa Grande.  There was much shooty goodness and a good time was had by all.

If you read nothing else from the month of November, read the speech George F. Will gave at the Cato Institute’s biennial Milton Friedman Prize dinner in 2010 that I laboriously fixed the speech-to-text transcription of. Or listen to the linked podcast. It’s that good. And a couple of days later, a companion piece supporting Mr. Will’s came along.

And remember that überpost I promised to write back in June? That I promised I’d get to in September? Still hadn’t written it. But Bill Whittle distilled a good chunk of it into an eight-minute video clip in November.

November’s Quote of the Month comes from Pultzer-Prize winning (for movie reviews) author Stephen Hunter from his novel I, Sniper in an excerpt which I title The Narrative.

And it would appear, even in the ultra-leftwing land that is San Francisco, that the economic reality of what’s going on there and everywhere in the nation is beginning to become impossible to ignore any longer. Even by the the alt-media.

Then, on November 15 I was notified that the Echo blog commenting service (that replaced HaloScan twelve months previously) would no longer be $10/year. No, now they wanted $10 a month, a 1200% increase, and if I didn’t pay up my comments – some 40,000 of them – would disappear. Thus began a mad scramble to figure out how to transition to a new commenting service and take my old comments with me. First, it required me to change the template of this blog, implementing a number of improvements, but screwing up some other stuff – like most of the older posts now show the title twice, something that delayed the writing of this post as I edited every single pre-November post in the year 2010 to correct that little irritant.

Also in November I did a little experiment at the request of Luckygunner.com, testing out some of their Fiocchi primers. The results were interesting.

I spent the rest of November screwing with the blog template and the comments, trying (unsuccessfully) to import the 16.5Mb of comments from Echo into Disqus. They imported, all right. They just aren’t attached to any particular posts. Echo’s export service seems to have severed that linkage, so Disqus has no clue where to put them.

And finally for November we discovered why John Conyers was so blasé about not reading the Obamacare bill. It didn’t have any pictures.

December brought us the (unsurprising) news that the People’s Republic of New Jerseystan still considers otherwise legal gun owners to be uncaught criminals, as Brian Aitken received a seven-year sentence for not breaking the law.

Quote of the Month goes to Daphne of Jaded Haven, who’s had just about enough from the Political Class.

Markadelphia might have taken his ball and gone home, but I got a new lefty commenter in December, one “jeff c.” who is apparently a Markadelphia syncophant. He left some droppings in the comments to a post in early December. He received the same response we’re used to.

On a lighter note, our VP was caught in a Kodak moment that I just had to share.

December also brought the eighth monthly Bowling Pin match (September’s was canceled because I was in Reno at GBRV). Twenty-two people showed up to shoot that one. I have to play with the format for 2011 because it takes too long the way we’re doing it now.

The Other Side™ is still using scaaaary numbers to frighten the public. And, once again, it’s inflated numbers for child deaths. Still, things are improving. In 2000 it was 4,000 accidental deaths a year. In May 2010 it was 500 accidental deaths a year, and now in December of 2010 it’s 300 a year by accident and suicide. At this rate of decline we’ll be into negative numbers some time around Tax Day.

And you remember that überpost? The one I promised in June? Then September? Then Bill Whittle did a great video on the topic in November? I finally finished it. Echo may be kaput, but Disqus racked up 160 comments on that one.

Daphne may have won December’s Quote of the Month, but reader and fellow blogger Moshe Ben-David won Quote of the Year with one of those comments.

In keeping with what I wrote in This I Believe a Houston jewelry store owner defended himself and his wife from a gang of armed robbers, killing the three who came into his store, but suffering wounds himself. His family has put up a page where you can donate to his medical fund, as he has no medical insurance.

And, finally, Daphne’s Quote of the Month gets a powerful affirmation by a surprising source, 60 Minutes, in “…the single-most important issue in the United States.”

I’d like to wish everyone a Happy New Year, but I’m afraid I’m going to have to settle for a “safe and secure New Year.” Somehow I don’t think there’s going to be a whole lot of Happy going around for a bit.

Quote of the Day – December 31st Edition

A good thought to conclude the year, from one of my favorite sources, Henry Louis Mencken (via Joe Huffman):

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman’s club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave.

Unfortunately, too many of our fellow citizens reject this philosophy.  It makes me think of this from Robert Heinlein:

Roman matrons used to say to their sons: “Come back with your shield, or on it.” Later on this custom declined. So did Rome.

Most Americans used to believe in liberty, but this custom has declined. See above.