Quote of the Week

Quote of the Week

The same theme over and over again is that the Left, from Wilson to FDR to Mussolini and yes, to Hitler, all think that their actions will make the world a better place. The goal of all of these people is to make a better world. The way to the most horrific examples of cruelty and slaughter in human history began with the highest and most noble intentions. The intention, first and foremost, of equality, of the “brotherhood of man”. The difference between fascism and Marxism is simply the scope. Lenin saw “humanity” as the proletariat, and everyone else as the eggs with which to make his omelet. Hitler’s definition of “humanity” is of course the Aryan German, and everyone else as an obstacle to be crushed.

Call me a cynic, but the more history (I) read the more I question the whole goal of equality. Now, it should be noted here then when I say equality I mean it in the Marxist definition of the redistribution of wealth. This economic equality is in fact the common goal of all the great evils of the 20th century. Plain old greed and ambition, whether it’s the Persians at Thermopylae, or the British at Assaye or the Americans at Manila Bay is nothing compared to the bodies heaped by those seeking “social justice”.

“Britt” in this comment to a post from Wednesday.

Rousseau, Marx, Hegel, and Engels are Still Killing

Rousseau, Marx, Hegel, and Engels are Still Killing

Burma killed by tyranny

If Cyclone Nargis had struck not Rangoon, but Melbourne or Tokyo, it is unlikely more than a few dozen people, if that, would have died. And that’s because we are free, and rich – as free people tend to be with capitalism. Even Bangkok would have survived this far, far easier.

But in Burma as many as 100,000 are now feared dead – victims not of global warming, but of a tyranny that has left them poor and defenceless.

Burma, a former British colony, was once the rice-bowl of South-East Asia, but in 1962 a bunch of generals took over with a misty-eyed plan to impose on their 50 million people the “Burmese Way to Socialism”.

Their brand of politics was of the kind still distressingly popular at RMIT and Victoria University, and produced exactly the misery it’s inflicted from Cuba to Russia.

The economy collapsed, and Burma went from bread-basket to basket-case. No wonder so many people today still live in shacks and shanties that were no protection against last Friday’s high winds and storm surge.

Whenever the Burmese people tried to protest against this junta-made poverty, and to demand democracy, they were shot – so often and in such numbers that China is now about the only ally the junta has left. In this way does resource-ravenous China, Olympics host, export its tyranny to the world.

Now consider how this junta – so brutal, unaccountable, incompetent, tyrannical and isolated — has handled this latest disaster.

Two days before Cyclone Nargis hit, India’s Meteorological Department warned the junta’s minions it was coming, and where.

But Burma’s state-owned media, one of the crudest propaganda outfits I’ve seen, issued no mass alerts. Indeed, illegal Voice of America broadcasts probably did more to warn Burma’s civilians to take shelter than did Burma’s own radio station.

At first, the full scale of the disaster was kept from the world.

Perhaps even the junta itself may not have known it, given there are no journalists free in that country to report what they see, and no untapped phone lines or internet to tell the world the truth.

Even now, the junta is killing people with its paranoia. Disaster assessment teams and helicopters from the United States have been blocked from coming in to prepare a huge rescue, and foreign aid teams not already in-country had their applications for visas stalled and aid shipments stopped.

Foreign journalists, whose reports would help raise appeal money, have been banned.

The UN is now “intensely” negotiating with the junta to let in aid workers and ease customs regulations on aid – literally begging the junta to let the world save its people.

So slow has the junta been to let in help, that French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, founder of aid group Medicins Sans Frontieres, suggested the UN Security Council adopt a resolution allowing aid to be flown into the country by force. China, naturally, is against such interference in the affairs of its “friend”.

True, the junta has let in some shipments of aid, and is particularly keen on being given cash rather than kind – which even the patsies of the European Union, not being completely insane, resist.

Why hand cash to thieves? I’ve seen for myself, on one of my trips to Burma, military heavies in shades openly demand bribes from Australian aid workers who were giving blankets to disaster victims.

In Mandalay, I saw a Red Cross ambulance, given by Japan, refitted for use as a taxi for military officials. The junta even today charges import duty on foreign donations.

With such tyrants in charge, the toll from Friday’s cyclone – already horrific – can only keep rising.

“But NO!” protests the American socialist, “What’s going on in Myanmar isn’t really socialism!“

No, but then Edward O. Wilson described socialism/communism best:

Wonderful theory. Wrong species.

h/t on the article to Firehand.

Now for Something a Bit Lighter

Now for Something a Bit Lighter…

From Rachel Lucas, the Quote of the Day:

I think ‘Firefly’ could solve most fertility problems.

Because I’m pretty sure I ovulated at least once per episode when I marathon-watched the series last weekend and am now quite possibly pregnant even though the only man in my life is on the other side of the country wearing body armor by day and sleeping on a cot in a barracks by night.

I think this is even more appropriate given this comment to Wednesday’s excerpt from Liberal Fascism:

The same theme over and over again is that the Left, from Wilson to FDR to Mussolini and yes, to Hitler, all think that their actions will make the world a better place. The goal of all of these people is to make a better world. The way to the most horrific examples of cruelty and slaughter in human history began with the highest and most noble intentions.

As I asked the commenter – “So, have you seen the film Serenity?”

well hell I’m a felon

Well, Hell, I’m a Felon

There’s been a lot of talk around the gunblogosphere about this case, but this is the first legacy media coverage of it I’m aware of:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/05/07/ldt.gov.guns.cnn

David Olofson is a member of AR15.com, and has been posting regularly on his case.

Under the conditions that gained him his conviction, I’m a felon, too. My AR15 is equipped with a Jewell trigger. When I first received it, the trigger was adjusted too light and it doubled on me twice in initial testing. I would imagine it would be a simple thing for any ATF “technician” to misadjust any Jewell-equipped AR to do the same.

According to the BATFE, that makes it a machine gun, if this case stands.

Here’s the quote that grates on my nerves:

Critics say the problems stem from a lack of uniform testing protocol at ATF.

My aching ass. They were told it was a machine gun, it was damned well going to be a machine gun. The BATFE doesn’t make mistakes! Remember, this is the organization that told its agents to perjure themselves on the witness stand by declaring that their NFA records were 100% accurate.

Mr. Olofson is scheduled to be sentenced next Tuesday. What he ought to get is an overturned decision, full restoration of his rights and property, and a big damned settlement check from the pocket of the local head of the BATFE.

Every time I hear about something like this, I think to myself that just perhaps John Ross’s Unintended Consequences isn’t so far-fetched after all.

And remember: This is the same group that is now after CavArms. David Codrea has been keeping tabs on that travesty.

Edited to add:

How do you like this? (TIFF file, download and blow up to read)

Here’s what it says: “Third notice. Final Claim Date May 25, 2008” At the top of the page (it’s cut off) it says that if the material is not claimed it is forfeit “and will be disposed of according to law.”

Here’s a partial screenshot of what was seized from CavArms that the government – without charging anyone with anything as of yet – is ready to “dispose of according to law”:

“Always Think Forfeiture” anyone?

Connected?

Connected?

40% more seek license to carry concealed gun

AUSTIN — Demand for concealed-handgun licenses has risen nearly 40 percent in Texas in a year, an increase being attributed to many factors, even presidential politics.

While the exact cause may be unclear, what’s certain is the spike in applications has caught the Department of Public Safety unprepared. The state is taking a month longer than the 60 days allowed by law to process original applications and 80 days longer on renewals, which are supposed to be handled within 45 days.

“We’re trying really hard, but there have been delays because of the tremendous increase in applications,” said Tela Mange, a DPS spokeswoman.

She said the department is paying overtime and hiring temporary workers to reduce the backlog. Mange said she doesn’t know why applications last month were 39 percent higher than in April 2007.

And then there’s this:

Trigger Happy: Gun Shops See Sales Spike After Home Invasions

Gun sales in Connecticut jumped sharply after three members of a Cheshire family were killed in a brutal home invasion last summer, and they continue to run about 20 percent above last year’s rate.

Gun shop owners now say a second home invasion in March in New Britain, where a parolee shot two elderly women, killing one, during an attempted robbery, may be a tipping point as worried homeowners scramble to arm themselves.

“Those home invasions were the worst things in the world,” said James Cummings, owner of Center Sports in Columbia. “But it is the best thing for my business.”

J.D. McAulay, owner of the Connecticut Gun Exchange in Milford, said customer traffic rose noticeably after both crimes, but especially after the most recent one.

“We have had first-time buyers looking for protection that have no idea about the process or that there is a process,” McAulay said. “They don’t know they need a permit for a handgun or that they need to take a course.”

In the first three months of 2007, 16,651 guns were sold statewide. In the first quarter of 2008, that number jumped to 20,101. More guns were sold in the first three weeks of April than in the entire month last year.

The monthly reports of gun sales from the state Department of Public Safety show a spike in gun purchases beginning early last fall. That was just weeks after two parolees invaded the Petit family home in Cheshire, killed three and burned the house to the ground.

From May to September in 2007, statewide gun sales had reached 5,000 only once.

From October to March, the lowest total was 6,185 in February. And that figure for February was 25 percent higher than a year earlier.

Zendo Deb (where I got the second link) wonders if this is evidence that we’re really not in a recession, and one gun shop owner thinks the entire increase in sales is due to the heinous home invasion, but here’s what one San Antonio CCW trainer thinks:

But Ross Bransford, who trains 1,000 Texans a year to qualify for a concealed handgun license, said he believes the looming 2008 election is a big factor.

“People are not sure what’s going to happen after the election,” said Bransford, who owns Austin-based CHL-Texas.com. “Both Democratic candidates are anti-gun in one fashion or another.”

I think that has a LOT to do with it. Other reasons:

Other instructors mentioned an increased interest from young adults after last year’s Virginia Tech massacre and recent changes in Texas law about carrying concealed weapons.

In 2007, lawmakers granted privacy to the 258,000 license holders by closing records that had been public since the concealed handgun law passed in 1995. They also extended the so-called “castle doctrine” defense to persons who use a gun to protect their vehicles, in addition to their homes.

But you don’t need a CCW to keep a gun in your home for self-defense in Texas. Then again, probably most people in Connecticut don’t know you need to take a training class and get a permit to purchase a pistol there, either:

While the home invasions have prompted the General Assembly to pass a $10 million crime bill — which Gov. M. Jodi Rell threatened veto for budget reasons — residents are taking personal steps.

“(Gun sales) are starting to go up because people are scared,” said Scott Hoffman, owner of Hoffman’s Gun Center in Newington and president of the Connecticut Association of Firearms Retailers.

The tag line for Hoffman’s store is “Guns For The Good Guys.”

His store has focused more on defense weapons than hunting rifles. He said the media coverage of the home invasions has pushed his sales higher.

“It’s unfortunate that it takes a tragedy, but that is usually how it works,” Hoffman said.

All three gun store owners declined to discuss the revenues their businesses generate.

But Hoffman and Cummings noted shifts in their customer base and growing interest in pistol permit courses.

Hoffman said he used to hold his pistol course every other week. Now it’s held weekly, and there are waiting lists for a month’s worth of classes.

That’s why I label these posts “Awakenings” – reality smacks people in the face, and some of them wake up.

Cummings, who’s sold guns for 26 years, said he’s used to serving hunters looking for rifles but that his new clientele(sic) is a different breed.

“Instead of the hunters, we get a lot of older people, older women, coming in for the (pistol) class,” he said.

“I don’t think an old lady wants a pistol permit to hunt,” Cummings added.

Shotguns are also favorites for those looking to protect their homes. For one thing, they’re less complicated to obtain.

Pistols require coursework, a 90-day wait and about $200 in miscellaneous permit and training costs.

The wait for a shotgun is about two weeks.

More menacing looking semi-automatic assault rifles, knockoffs of the M-16 or AK-47, are also increasingly popular.

Yes, they’re only good for killing a large number of people indiscriminately which is why the Chicago PD is among the latest departments to equip with with them.

Right?

But even in Connecticut, the upcoming election is seen as a major driver of gun sales:

Politics is definitely a factor in rising gun sales, he added.

“Politicians have been my best salesmen for 20 years because people want what they can’t have,” he said. “They are afraid their rights are going to be taken away.”

Hoffman pointed to a possible change in gun policy coming from the next president in 2009 or other legislation from the state Capitol.

Two bills referred to the state judiciary committee this year would have required firearm manufactures to micro-stamp all guns with information and engrave ammunition with serial numbers.

But the Eeeeeevil NRA intervened!

In response, the National Rifle Association put out a call to its constituents.

A March press conference on the issue drew eight executives from gun manufacturers and two trade associations.

Both pieces of legislation eventually died in committee, as the companies argued they would force factories out of state and cost the state jobs.

That’s right – Connecticut is home for several firearms manufacturers. And of course, we have to hear from the concerned citizens who oppose the nefarious NRA:

Those opposed to gun violence, specifically the non-profit Connecticut Against Gun Violence, want to prevent the flow of guns purchased legally from reaching the hands of criminals.

“As long as dealers are following state law, we don’t really have a comment about increasing gun sales,” said Lisa Labella, executive director for CAGV.

“We respect the rights of law-abiding gun dealers and owners. We don’t believe that a gun is the best form of home defense. We would prefer more security systems instead.”

Go ahead. Pull my other leg.

And, killing two birds with one stone, so to speak, here’s today’s Quote of the Day:

“Politicians have been my best salesmen for 20 years because people want what they can’t have. They are afraid their rights are going to be taken away.”

Unintended consequences.

Next Excerpt

Next Excerpt:

From Easy Rider to JFK, Hollywood has been telling us that if only the forces of reaction hadn’t killed their Horst Wessels, we would today be living in a better, more just, and more open-minded country. And if only we could rekindle the hope and ambition of those early radicals, “what might have been” will turn into “what could still be.” This is the vital lie of the left. Western civilization was saved when the barbarians were defeated, at least temporarily, in the early 1970s. We should be not only grateful for our slender victory but vigilant in securing it for posterity.

Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism, p. 199

(*SIGH*) I’ve Already Answered That Question

Say Uncle linked to an op-ed at the Philadelphia Daily News website by one Jill Porter: How many must die before gun lobby gets message?

I’ve been asked that question before, so I dropped her an email:

Ms. Porter:

I read with interest your recent column “How many must die before gun lobby gets message?”

Apparently you haven’t been paying attention, but we – the gun-owning public (AKA “the gun lobby”) – have.

The message is “there are too many gun in America.” The message is “it’s too easy to buy guns in America.” The message is “guns cause crime in America.”

We’ve heard it, loud and clear.

And we reject it.

I’ve been asked the question you put forward in your column before. Here is my response:

“How many deaths will it take before you realize that gun control isn’t effective, and stop pushing for new gun control laws?”

I have written a piece of my own that I invite you to read (and hopefully comment on) here:

http://tinyurl.com/5c7xwg

I don’t really expect you to follow through, but you did ask the question.

We’ll see if she has anything to say, but I’m not holding my breath.

Edited to add this very appropriate cartoon:


(Click for full size)

Today’s Excerpt from Liberal Fascism

Today’s Excerpt from Liberal Fascism

In the liberal telling of America’s story, there are ony two perpetrators of official misdeeds: conservatives and “America” writ large. (P)rogressives, or modern liberals, are never bigots or tyrants, but conservatives often are. For example, one will virtually never hear that the Palmer Raids, Prohibition, or American eugenics were thoroughly progressive phenomena. These are sins America itself must atone for. Meanwhile, real or alleged “conservative” misdeeds – say, McCarthyism – are always the exclusive fault of conservatives and a sign of the policies they would repeat if given power. The only culpable mistake that liberals make is failing to fight “hard enough” for their principles. Liberals are never responsible for historic misdeeds, because they feel no compulsion to defend the inherent goodness of America. Conservatives, meanwhile, not only take the blame for events not of their own making, but find themselves defending liberal misdeeds in order to defend America itself.

Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism, p. 118

The only culpable mistake that liberals make is failing to fight “hard enough” for their principles.

“The philosophy cannot be wrong! Do it again, only HARDER!“

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

I for one support any operation that boils down to “Hey, what happens if we concentrate the power consumption of the eastern seaboard of the US into a space roughly the size of Barack Obama’s integrity?” You just know something cool is gonna happen.

Stingray at Atomic Nerds in I Love CERN!

Personally, I’d like to see them try to concentrate that power into a space the size of Hillary’s integrity, but that produces a divide-by-zero error.

More from Liberal Fascism

More from Liberal Fascism

Progressivism, liberalism, or whatever you want to call it has become an ideology of power. So long as liberals hold it, principles don’t matter. It also highlights the real fascist legacy of World War I and the New Deal: the notion that government action in the name of “good things” under the direction of “our people” is always and everywhere justified. Dissent by the right people is the highest form of patriotism. Dissent by the wrong people is troubling evidence of incipient fascism. The anti-dogmatism that progressives and fascists alike inherited from Pragmatism made the motives of the activist the only criteria for judging the legitimacy of action.

—

This has been the liberal enterprise ever since: to transform a democratic republic into an enormous tribal community, to give every member of society from Key West, Florida, to Fairbanks, Alaska, that same sense of belonging – “we’re all in it together!” – that we allegedly feel in a close-knit community. The yearning for community is deep and human and decent. But these yearnings are often misplaced when channeled through the federal government and imposed across a diverse nation with a republican constitution. This was the debate at the heart of the Constitutional Convention and one that the progressives sought to settle permanently in their favor. The government cannot love you, and any politics that works on a different assumption is destined for no good. And yet ever since the New Deal, liberals have been unable to shake this fundamental dogma that the state can be the instrument for a politics of meaning that transforms the entire nation into a village.

Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism pp. 158, 159-160

From today’s lunchtime reading.