23 Is Old Enough

23 Is Old Enough

Old enough to own a firearm. Old enough to get a CCW permit. But not in Manhattan. And not if you attend Columbia University. No, in that case you have no option but to rely on the State for your protection.

And the State failed a 23 year old woman, a student at Columbia and resident of Manhattan. And, like Linda Riss, she has no legal recourse against the state for that failure to protect.

Bad things happen to good people, but read what she had to endure:

Over many torturous hours, she had been repeatedly raped, sodomized and forced to perform oral sex, a prosecutor told a jury on Thursday. The accused, Robert A. Williams, 31, had doused the woman’s face and body with boiling water and bleach, forced her to swallow handfuls of pills and to chase them with beer, sealed her mouth with glue, and bound her wrists and legs with shoelaces, cords and duct tape, said the prosecutor, Ann P. Prunty. And now, Ms. Prunty said, he was asking the woman to gouge out her own eyes with a pair of scissors.

And so the woman, sitting on the floor of her studio apartment in Hamilton Heights and holding a pair of scissors between her knees — the blade pointing toward her face — tried to stop the suffering. She lowered her face to the blade, but turned her head at the last moment, trying to stab herself in the neck instead of her eyes.

The scissors slipped from her grasp, the suicide attempt failed, and the woman suffered several more hours of torture, Ms. Prunty said.

But wait, there’s more.

The woman survived the nearly 19-hour ordeal, which ended, Ms. Prunty said, when she used a fire started by Mr. Williams to burn the cords that secured her wrists to a futon.

Mr. Williams went on trial Thursday in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, where he faces 71 criminal counts, including attempted murder, rape, arson and assault. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison.

Could but probably won’t. Here’s his previous rap sheet:

Mr. Williams, who was homeless at the time of his arrest about a week later at the scene of a burglary in Queens, has a lengthy police record dating to his childhood, the authorities have said.

He was charged in a murder as a juvenile, though the outcome of that case is sealed, a law enforcement official said, and he spent eight years in prison for an attempted-murder conviction in 1996.

Why was this guy even on the street?

Here’s how he got her:

On the night of the attack, the victim, a month from graduating with a master’s degree, was at Columbia, putting the final touches on her résumé for a job fair the next day, Ms. Prunty said. When she arrived at her apartment building, she got on the elevator and found Mr. Williams inside, Ms. Prunty said. She rode with him to her floor, and could hear him follow her as she navigated the long L-shaped hallway to her apartment.

As the woman entered her apartment, Ms. Prunty said, Mr. Williams asked her if she knew where a Mrs. Evans lived. The woman stopped to answer.

“Her kind moment of hesitation would cost her,” Ms. Prunty said.

Mr. Williams forced his way into the apartment, Ms. Prunty said, put the woman in a chokehold, and slapped her cellphone from her hand. Mr. Williams slammed the door behind him, and “her Friday the 13th nightmare began,” Ms. Prunty said.

The anti-gun people tell victims to “give their attacker what they want.” He wanted her body. He wanted her to gouge out her own eyes. Instead, she attempted to end her own life.

How can anyone believe that it is morally superior to submit to a rapist rather than carry a gun and have at least the chance to shoot the bastard?

This could be you, your sister, daughter, wife, mother. Please, take a “Refuse to be a Victim” course. Learn how to spot the danger signs. Learn how to protect yourself, even if you are unable to be armed. Don’t let anything like this happen to you, or someone you love. No one should have to endure this. No one should have to deal with its consequences.

Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

If the Dems had run one of their “political whore” candidates, maybe even the lovely and talented Hillary Clinton, I might have opted to vote Libertarian, where my heart is, rather than for a man I particularly dislike who champions a morally and ethically bankrupt political party of weasels and morons.

But that’s not what the Dems have done…they’ve played the scary card. – Michael Bane, Hunters vs. Shooters

RTWT.

More Reasoned Discourse

More “Reasoned Discourse”?

A blogspot blog popped up the other day entitled Soulless Letters, and it contained a pretty anti-gunrights post that was commented on by several members of the Triangle of Death, me being one. As a matter of fact, here’s my comment in its entirety, since I saved it just in case:

However, do you really need your gun in the grocery store or your local Wal-Mart? Really, do you?

Ask that question to Joyce Cordova, a Wal-Mart employee in Albuquerque. Her ex-husband, Felix Vigil, violated his restraining order and attacked her where he knew she would have to be – in the deli department where she worked. He stabbed her multiple times and most likely would have killed her had not 72 year-old Due Moore, a licensed CCW holder, not drawn his handgun and shot Mr. Vigil, stopping the threat.

I would invite you to ask Megan Leann Holden, a Wal-Mart employee who was abducted from the parking lot as she left work, but she’s dead. Her killer, Johnny Lee Williams, later attempted to rob an RV park, but the attendant there was armed, and Mr. Williams ended up going to the hospital with a gunshot wound to the shoulder.

There has to be a better solution than guns.

Phasers?

Call me crazy, but I just don’t want to have to think about my fellow hikers carrying guns.

If you’re not already thinking about it, then you’re living in a fantasy world. Criminals are already there. Concealed-carry permit holders just want the ability to protect themselves from them.

What gets me is that if you allow people to carry weapons into our national treasures, what is to stop the bad guy from doing the same;

As others have noted, this one line makes me think this entire piece might be satire.

Unfortunately, the anti-gun forces are so out-there that a reasonable person can no longer tell the difference between the ones who are serious and satire.

Concealed carry is not a mistake. In every one of the thirty-nine states in which “shall-issue” concealed carry or permitless concealed carry is the law, the worst thing you can say about it is that it might not have been responsible for the decline in violent crime rates there.

CCW permit holders aren’t fearful, we’re aware that the primary responsibility for our protection is ours. The police are wonderful, but when seconds count the police are only minutes away.

It’s people disconnected from that reality – like you – who we just don’t understand. But that’s OK. Feel free to enjoy your heightened safety knowing that a good citizen with a firearm might be the one to come to your rescue – like Due Moore did for Joyce Cordova.

Just for grins-n-giggles, I thought I’d check to see if A) there was anything new, and B) if my comment still existed.

Not only is my comment gone, the entire blog is down the memory hole:

Yup. Looks like more “Reasoned Discourse.”

Ayn Rand Was Right

Do you really think we want those laws to be observed? We want them broken. There is no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is to crack down on criminals. When there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking the law. Create a nation of lawbreakers and then you can cash in on the guilt. Now that’s the system! – Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957

Several bloggers have reported on the 10 year old Winchendon, Massachusetts boy who was suspended from school for five days for bringing a spent (that’s “fired,” “inert,” or “empty” for those of you in the Journalism profession) blank (that’s “never had a projectile” – the pointy bit that’s designed to come out of the barrel, the long tube-thingy that… never mind.) cartridge case to his school – a fired blank case that was given to him by a veteran, presumably after it was fired in a 21-gun salute on Memorial Day.

Yes, that’s outrageous.

But Sebastian at Snowflakes in Hell has a little different spin on the story:

Well, the problem is, if you don’t have a license to have a firearm in Massachuetts, you can’t even possess ammunition or ammunition components. The truth is, this kid and everyone involved in this situation is lucky that it’s only resulting in a five day suspension. Under Massachusetts law, both the kid, the veteran who gave the kid the empty shell casing, and the teacher to took if from the kid could be looking at two years in prison for having ammunition components without a license.

These are the “reasonable restrictions” that the Brady Campaign wants to impose on the rest of the country. And they call us “nuts” and “paranoid” for arguing that these regulations are anything but reasonable.

I would be very curious to learn how often these laws are actually used in prosecution against armed robbers, drug dealers and the like.

A license to possess a spent cartridge case. It boggles.

All But Two

Buy a Car, Get a Gun

The dealer says every buyer has selected the gun, “except one guy from Canada and an old guy”

By Paul Westcott
Clear Channel Online

A Missouri car dealership is offering a free gun with every car purchase. Max Motors is offering customers the choice between a $250 gas card or a hand gun. Most have chosen the gun.

Owner Mark Muller said: “We’re just damn glad to live in a free country where you can have a gun if you want to.”

The dealership sells used and new cars mostly GM models and has a logo of of a cowboy holding a pistol.

In the past three days the dealership has sold 30 cars and trucks, an increase which the owners say is due to their promotional offer.

Muller recommends a Kel-Tec .380 pistol, which he describes as “a nice little handgun that fits in your pocket”. He added that the promotion was inspired by recent comments from one of the Democratic nominees for the presidential election, saying: “We did it because of Barack Obama.

“He said all those people in the Midwest, you’ve got to have compassion for them because they’re clinging to their guns and their Bibles. I found that quite offensive. We all go to church on Sunday and we all carry guns.”

The website advertisement for the offer, which continues until the end of the month, mentions that an approved background check on gun ownership is required.

See Max’s site.

I see the Obamessiah really did offend a lot of people in flyover country. There have been a number of similar giveaways I’m aware of, but the ones I can remember here in Tucson have usually been a Marlin lever-action rifle or something similar, not a handgun suitable for concealment.

All I can say is, I bet the firearm industry is looking at this election with a combination of hope and fear. If the Democrats win, their sales will likely skyrocket.

For a while.

Also, there’s a survey! “Do you think offering a free gun with the purchase of a new car is a good idea?” Of the 4600 people who’ve responded so far, 65% say “Yes.”

From the Department of “DUH!”

From the Department of “DUH!”

As outraged politicians called for an investigation Monday into how a violent parolee got his hands on a semiautomatic rifle and shot three people at a Granada Hills church festival, frustrated law enforcement officials admitted what has become painfully clear – if criminals want guns, they’ll find them.

Despite some of the country’s toughest gun laws, California’s violent ex-cons, like Fernando Diaz Jr., 33, have no problem arming themselves.Shooting spotlights gun sales problem

The “semiautomatic rifle” was a .22.

I wonder if it was a Marlin Model 60 “assault weapon.”

More “DUH!”, same source:

“We try and enforce the law, but those that are intent on breaking the law will break the law,” said Lt. Steven Nielsen, head of the LAPD’s gun unit.

A lesson a lot of women with “restraining orders” learn – the hard way. And another:

Despite years of cracking down, officials say the strong demand for weapons – everything from revolvers to semiautomatic handguns – continues to fuel an underground arms trade organized by gangs and other criminals.

Father Guido Sarducci’s five-minute university economics curriculum: “Supply and Demand. That’s it.”

But the response? Do it again, only HARDER!

Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich argues that more safeguards must be put in place to prevent the tragedy that rocked Granada Hills last weekend.

(h/t to Zendo Deb for the pointer.)

Must Be Nice

Must Be Nice!

So, what happens when you’re a lawmaker and you violate the law? Write a new one!

Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) is a former hunter with an arsenal of weapons that reportedly features shotguns, rifles and pistols, including a Walther PPK of James Bond fame.

But there’s a problem.

Mell forgot to re-register the weapons as required every year by the ordinance that he helped to pass as one of the City Council’s most senior members.

So, what does an alderman do when he finds himself in violation of the law? He writes a new law. Mell has quietly introduced an ordinance that would reopen gun registration in Chicago and create a one-month amnesty for himself and other gun owners in the same predicament.

As others have pointed out that the law as written makes it illegal to re-register any grandfathered handguns – forget to keep up the registration once, and you can never re-register them again.

But here’s the part of the story that really irks me:

“I knew it was the law. I thought it was being done [by a staff member]. If you have a person you trust to do it and they don’t do it, then it doesn’t get done. I’m not gonna say it’s embarrassing. I’m just gonna say I should have done it,” the alderman said.

So a staff member was supposed to take time on the clock to do Alderman Richard Mell’s personal business? What else does he do on the public’s dime? Pick up Mell’s dry cleaning? Do his grocery shopping?

This, too pissed me off:

Mell said he first realized he was in violation of the re-registration requirement about a year ago. When he tried to re-register his guns belatedly, the Chicago Police Department’s Gun Registration Section refused to bend the rules. Mell appealed that ruling to the city’s Department of Administrative Hearings but decided to re-write the law instead.”When we looked at the law, we saw the possibility of winning [the appeal] wasn’t gonna happen,” he said.

Had one of his constituents come to him in a similar predicament, what would Mell have done or said? “Sorry, tough luck” is my bet. Now it’s been a year – so what happened to all of his guns?

He should be hoist on his own petard.

Or tarred and feathered.

AFTER he gets the stupid damned law repealed.

Connected?

Connected?

40% more seek license to carry concealed gun

AUSTIN — Demand for concealed-handgun licenses has risen nearly 40 percent in Texas in a year, an increase being attributed to many factors, even presidential politics.

While the exact cause may be unclear, what’s certain is the spike in applications has caught the Department of Public Safety unprepared. The state is taking a month longer than the 60 days allowed by law to process original applications and 80 days longer on renewals, which are supposed to be handled within 45 days.

“We’re trying really hard, but there have been delays because of the tremendous increase in applications,” said Tela Mange, a DPS spokeswoman.

She said the department is paying overtime and hiring temporary workers to reduce the backlog. Mange said she doesn’t know why applications last month were 39 percent higher than in April 2007.

And then there’s this:

Trigger Happy: Gun Shops See Sales Spike After Home Invasions

Gun sales in Connecticut jumped sharply after three members of a Cheshire family were killed in a brutal home invasion last summer, and they continue to run about 20 percent above last year’s rate.

Gun shop owners now say a second home invasion in March in New Britain, where a parolee shot two elderly women, killing one, during an attempted robbery, may be a tipping point as worried homeowners scramble to arm themselves.

“Those home invasions were the worst things in the world,” said James Cummings, owner of Center Sports in Columbia. “But it is the best thing for my business.”

J.D. McAulay, owner of the Connecticut Gun Exchange in Milford, said customer traffic rose noticeably after both crimes, but especially after the most recent one.

“We have had first-time buyers looking for protection that have no idea about the process or that there is a process,” McAulay said. “They don’t know they need a permit for a handgun or that they need to take a course.”

In the first three months of 2007, 16,651 guns were sold statewide. In the first quarter of 2008, that number jumped to 20,101. More guns were sold in the first three weeks of April than in the entire month last year.

The monthly reports of gun sales from the state Department of Public Safety show a spike in gun purchases beginning early last fall. That was just weeks after two parolees invaded the Petit family home in Cheshire, killed three and burned the house to the ground.

From May to September in 2007, statewide gun sales had reached 5,000 only once.

From October to March, the lowest total was 6,185 in February. And that figure for February was 25 percent higher than a year earlier.

Zendo Deb (where I got the second link) wonders if this is evidence that we’re really not in a recession, and one gun shop owner thinks the entire increase in sales is due to the heinous home invasion, but here’s what one San Antonio CCW trainer thinks:

But Ross Bransford, who trains 1,000 Texans a year to qualify for a concealed handgun license, said he believes the looming 2008 election is a big factor.

“People are not sure what’s going to happen after the election,” said Bransford, who owns Austin-based CHL-Texas.com. “Both Democratic candidates are anti-gun in one fashion or another.”

I think that has a LOT to do with it. Other reasons:

Other instructors mentioned an increased interest from young adults after last year’s Virginia Tech massacre and recent changes in Texas law about carrying concealed weapons.

In 2007, lawmakers granted privacy to the 258,000 license holders by closing records that had been public since the concealed handgun law passed in 1995. They also extended the so-called “castle doctrine” defense to persons who use a gun to protect their vehicles, in addition to their homes.

But you don’t need a CCW to keep a gun in your home for self-defense in Texas. Then again, probably most people in Connecticut don’t know you need to take a training class and get a permit to purchase a pistol there, either:

While the home invasions have prompted the General Assembly to pass a $10 million crime bill — which Gov. M. Jodi Rell threatened veto for budget reasons — residents are taking personal steps.

“(Gun sales) are starting to go up because people are scared,” said Scott Hoffman, owner of Hoffman’s Gun Center in Newington and president of the Connecticut Association of Firearms Retailers.

The tag line for Hoffman’s store is “Guns For The Good Guys.”

His store has focused more on defense weapons than hunting rifles. He said the media coverage of the home invasions has pushed his sales higher.

“It’s unfortunate that it takes a tragedy, but that is usually how it works,” Hoffman said.

All three gun store owners declined to discuss the revenues their businesses generate.

But Hoffman and Cummings noted shifts in their customer base and growing interest in pistol permit courses.

Hoffman said he used to hold his pistol course every other week. Now it’s held weekly, and there are waiting lists for a month’s worth of classes.

That’s why I label these posts “Awakenings” – reality smacks people in the face, and some of them wake up.

Cummings, who’s sold guns for 26 years, said he’s used to serving hunters looking for rifles but that his new clientele(sic) is a different breed.

“Instead of the hunters, we get a lot of older people, older women, coming in for the (pistol) class,” he said.

“I don’t think an old lady wants a pistol permit to hunt,” Cummings added.

Shotguns are also favorites for those looking to protect their homes. For one thing, they’re less complicated to obtain.

Pistols require coursework, a 90-day wait and about $200 in miscellaneous permit and training costs.

The wait for a shotgun is about two weeks.

More menacing looking semi-automatic assault rifles, knockoffs of the M-16 or AK-47, are also increasingly popular.

Yes, they’re only good for killing a large number of people indiscriminately which is why the Chicago PD is among the latest departments to equip with with them.

Right?

But even in Connecticut, the upcoming election is seen as a major driver of gun sales:

Politics is definitely a factor in rising gun sales, he added.

“Politicians have been my best salesmen for 20 years because people want what they can’t have,” he said. “They are afraid their rights are going to be taken away.”

Hoffman pointed to a possible change in gun policy coming from the next president in 2009 or other legislation from the state Capitol.

Two bills referred to the state judiciary committee this year would have required firearm manufactures to micro-stamp all guns with information and engrave ammunition with serial numbers.

But the Eeeeeevil NRA intervened!

In response, the National Rifle Association put out a call to its constituents.

A March press conference on the issue drew eight executives from gun manufacturers and two trade associations.

Both pieces of legislation eventually died in committee, as the companies argued they would force factories out of state and cost the state jobs.

That’s right – Connecticut is home for several firearms manufacturers. And of course, we have to hear from the concerned citizens who oppose the nefarious NRA:

Those opposed to gun violence, specifically the non-profit Connecticut Against Gun Violence, want to prevent the flow of guns purchased legally from reaching the hands of criminals.

“As long as dealers are following state law, we don’t really have a comment about increasing gun sales,” said Lisa Labella, executive director for CAGV.

“We respect the rights of law-abiding gun dealers and owners. We don’t believe that a gun is the best form of home defense. We would prefer more security systems instead.”

Go ahead. Pull my other leg.

And, killing two birds with one stone, so to speak, here’s today’s Quote of the Day:

“Politicians have been my best salesmen for 20 years because people want what they can’t have. They are afraid their rights are going to be taken away.”

Unintended consequences.

(*SIGH*) I’ve Already Answered That Question

Say Uncle linked to an op-ed at the Philadelphia Daily News website by one Jill Porter: How many must die before gun lobby gets message?

I’ve been asked that question before, so I dropped her an email:

Ms. Porter:

I read with interest your recent column “How many must die before gun lobby gets message?”

Apparently you haven’t been paying attention, but we – the gun-owning public (AKA “the gun lobby”) – have.

The message is “there are too many gun in America.” The message is “it’s too easy to buy guns in America.” The message is “guns cause crime in America.”

We’ve heard it, loud and clear.

And we reject it.

I’ve been asked the question you put forward in your column before. Here is my response:

“How many deaths will it take before you realize that gun control isn’t effective, and stop pushing for new gun control laws?”

I have written a piece of my own that I invite you to read (and hopefully comment on) here:

http://tinyurl.com/5c7xwg

I don’t really expect you to follow through, but you did ask the question.

We’ll see if she has anything to say, but I’m not holding my breath.

Edited to add this very appropriate cartoon:


(Click for full size)

Yes, Exactly

From the Toronto Star“A look beyond the handgun ban”:

David Kennedy, an anthropologist at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the City University of New York, is the godfather of this approach. In 1996, when he was a professor at Harvard, Kennedy launched the Boston Gun Project, the first intervention of its kind. It reduced gun crime in the city by 60 per cent. Since then, it has blossomed to a number of cities across the U.nited States.

Kennedy views bans, like the one Miller is pushing for, as a symptom of the problem, not a cure. “For people desperately searching for a solution, it seems like it makes sense,” says Kennedy. “What they don’t understand is that there are better tools that don’t require law to implement, and are practically cookbook and off-the-shelf.”

Chicago’s Project Safe Neighbourhoods is close to Kennedy’s prescription (he helped advise on the project); Cincinnati’s Initiative to Reduce Violence is its full manifestation. In Cincinnati, gun-related homicides spiked in 2006 to 89, more than double the annual average, since 1991, of 43.

Kennedy’s research team unpacked what he calls typical trends: They identified 69 distinct street groups, comprising about 1,000 people. Of the 89 homicides, these 1,000 people – less than half a per cent of the city’s population – were connected to more than 75 per cent of them.

Identifying the problem makes the solution relatively simple, Kennedy says. “If we change the behaviour of these people, we solve the problem.”

(Emphasis mine.) Precisely what I’ve been saying since I started this blog. In America, and I assume pretty much worldwide, the vast majority of violent crime is committed by a tiny percentage of the population, almost all of whom have prior criminal records. As I have noted here in the past, American homicide rates are heavily skewed by the fact that young, black, urban males – who make up less than 13% of America’s population – commit and are the victims of well over half the homicides America suffers each year. And on top of that, the young, black, urban males that actually commit the murders are a tiny fraction of that 13%.

But the political response to this is “gun control”?

As SayUncle says, “Gun control is what you do instead of something.”

But the philosophy says the number of guns is the problem, not the behavior of a tiny, identifiable group of people, and since the philosophy cannot be wrong, the consistent failure of the “solution” – gun control – cannot be because the wrong path is being pursued. No, no! The failure must be due to improper implementation! The only response must be to do it again, only HARDER!.

(h/t: Say Uncle)

UPDATE and correction: Chris Byrne in comments notes:

Actually, blacks as a whole are about 14% of the population.

Young, male, urban blacks, are about 3% of the population.

Of those, 24% have a felony criminal record.

It’s not about race, it’s just demographics.

He’s right, and I knew that. According to the CDC’s data:

2005 – Total population 296,507,061
Black males 10-34 years old 7,763,680, or 2.62% of the population.

Homicides (all) – 10,438
Black males 10-34 – 5,181,

2.62% of the population, 49.6% of the victims.

One-gun-a-month laws, closing the “gun show loophole,” licensing, registration, “assault weapon” bans, and handgun bans will somehow make this all go away because “the number of guns” in America is the problem.

No it’s not.

Identifying the problem makes the solution relatively simple, Kennedy says. “If we change the behaviour of these people, we solve the problem.”

Yes indeed.