[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i4tuuy1jsw?rel=0]
Nah. Probably not.
Tag: media
I Don’t Have the TIME It Would Take to Fisk This
Sweet BLEEDING Jeebus. I thought “professional” “news” “media” had “layers of editors and fact-checkers.” Here’s just the FIRST PARAGRAPH of a Guardian (UK) article.
A plan by President Barack Obama to close a loophole which allows Americans to buy weapons such as machine guns, grenades and sawn-off shotguns without undergoing background checks is set to be delayed, due to intense opposition from the NRA and other anti-gun-control activists.
And it goes on like that!
The mind boggles.
Read the comments, too.
(h/t to my favorite Merchant O’Death.)
Quote of the Day – Sultan Knish Edition
Daniel Greenfield, who blogs at Sultan Knish, is also a contributor at FrontPage Mag. His most recent column No Country for Liberal Republicans is chock-full of QotD material. Here’s my selection for today’s serving:
In the last two elections, the bloodthirsty neo-confederate party of hate served up a liberal Republican, currently championing Obama’s illegal alien amnesty, and a liberal Republican, currently being blamed by Obama supporters for inspiring ObamaCare. Its fantasy candidate for the upcoming election had spent the last election hugging Obama, and then signed off on tuition for illegal aliens and banned gay conversion therapy, and was, until a few weeks ago, being praised as the ultimate good Republican; only to be subjected to the same ritual media humiliations as McCain and Romney.
The same media that insisted that the murder of four Americans in Benghazi was not a scandal and that the murder of Brian Terry in Operation Fast and Furious was not a scandal is bleating that a little traffic is a scandal. Not a little traffic in assault rifles, as in Fast and Furious, but in the distance between cars.
By all means, do read the whole thing.
Another Box-Office Loser
So Harvey Weinstein has announced that he’s going to make a new film, starring Meryl Streep:
Mr. Weinstein then revealed his secret project about the gun rights group. “I shouldn’t say this, but I’ll tell it to you, Howard,” he said. “I’m going to make a movie with Meryl Streep, and we’re going to take this head-on. And they’re going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them.”
“This” and “them” being “guns” and “the NRA.”
Perhaps Mr. Weinstein should read Brian Anse Patrick’s The National Rifle Association and the Media: The Motivating Force of Negative Coverage.
Nah. Let him waste other people’s money.
UPDATE: Saw this over at Bubba’s:
Doesn’t Fit The Narrative™
Yesterday I stumbled across this story at BusinessInsider.com, CONFIRMED: The DEA Struck A Deal With Mexico’s Most Notorious Drug Cartel:
An investigation by El Universal found that between the years 2000 and 2012, the U.S. government had an arrangement with Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel that allowed the organization to smuggle billions of dollars of drugs while Sinaloa provided information on rival cartels.
Sinaloa, led by Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, supplies 80% of the drugs entering the Chicago area and has a presence in cities across the U.S.
There have long been allegations that Guzman, considered to be “the world’s most powerful drug trafficker,” coordinates with American authorities.
Read the whole thing, but there is this disclaimer at the bottom:
This post has caused many to interpret that the U.S. government is actively supporting Sinaloa. That has not been established, despite claims by Zambada-Niebla’s lawyer and Stratfor’s source. What El Universal’s investigation and the newly published court documents reveal is that there was a strong correlation between 2005 and 2009 regarding the rise of the Sinaloa cartel and the DEA’s relatively regular contact with a top Sinaloa lawyer.
This story reminded me of the El Paso Times report from July of 2011 that U.S. military weapons (the real thing, not semi-autos from border gun shops) were being smuggled to the Zetas cartel through Texas and New Mexico – Zetas may be smuggling weapons:
The brutally violent Zetas drug organization may be smuggling military-grade weapons through El Paso and Columbus, N.M., to feed its ongoing battles against other cartels and to possibly disrupt the 2012 elections in Mexico.
Phil Jordan, a former director of the DEA’s El Paso Intelligence Center and a former CIA operative, said the Zetas have shipped large amounts of weapons through the El Paso area.
A federal law enforcement agency in El Paso said it has no information about the allegations that the Zetas are smuggling weapons through El Paso.
“They are purchasing weapons in the Dallas area and are flying them to El Paso, and then they are taking them across the border into Juárez,” said Jordan, a law enforcement consultant and former DEA official who still has contacts in the law enforcement community.
—
Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, a former CIA contract pilot, supported Jordan’s allegations and said the Zetas allegedly also purchased property in the Columbus-Palomas border region to stash weapons and other contraband.
He said purchasing property and setting up a weapons-smuggling network suggests that the Zetas were establishing a staging area for their operations.
DEA Special Agent Diana Apodaca, spokeswoman for El Paso’s DEA office, said the agency did not have any information about the Zetas allegedly operating in this border region.
No one from the Border Patrol or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives returned calls Tuesday for comment.
Earlier this month, Plumlee had a debriefing with the Border Patrol in Las Cruces about the intelligence he gathered when he accompanied the U.S. military’s Task Force 7 along the border. The military, which assists civilian law enforcement in counter-drug operations, was looking into allegations of gun smuggling along the border.
“The military task force became concerned that its information about arms smuggling was being compromised,” Plumlee said. “From the intel, it appears that a company was set up in Mexico to purchase weapons through the U.S. Direct Commercial Sales program, and that the company may have had a direct link to the Zetas.”
Under the Direct Commercial Sales program, the U.S. State Department regulates and licenses businesses to sell weapons and defense services and training for export. Last year, according to U.S. statistics, the program was used to provide Mexico $416.5 million worth of weapons and equipment, including military-grade weaponry.
The program is different from the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program, which operates on a government-to-government basis.
Plumlee said military-grade weapons were found in a Juárez warehouse two years ago, and some of them were moved later to a ranch elsewhere in Juárez. Arms stash houses have also been reported in places across the border from Columbus and Antelope Wells, N.M.
“They’ve found anti-aircraft weapons and hand grenades from the Vietnam War era,” Plumlee said. Other weapons found include grenade launchers, assault rifles, handguns and military gear including night-vision goggles and body armor.
Do read the whole thing.
Two things about this struck me: One, it would appear that the Department of Justice is working with one cartel and the State Department is (or was) working with a different cartel. Two, neither of these stories has any traction with the major media. UPI picked up the El Paso Times story, but I found no other major media references to it in Google. The new Business Insider piece? Crickets.
I guess Bridgeghazi is more important.
UPDATE: I contacted the reporter from the El Paso Times piece, Diana Washington Valdez, with the question “I was curious as to whether there was any follow-on to this story?” Her response:
No, because neither ATF or DEA will provide any more information. All they keep saying is that the investigation is ongoing. (I think the investigation is long over.)
This is my shocked face….
Quote of the Day – Tam Edition
“Bridgeghazi” is the headline story on Meet The Press. Extra Double Tone Deaf Pauline Kael Irony Points for the people in the media calling it “Bridgeghazi” who don’t even acknowledge Benghazi as an actual, you know, scandal. — Tam, What did he know and when did he know it?
Firefly > Castle
Over at AR15.com in the “General Discussion” forum, someone posted that the short-lived TV Fox series Firefly is better than the ABC series Castle, both starring Nathan Fillion.
I had to share my response:
I’m a 51 year-old male. I watch Castle because of Stana Katic.
And because I like Nathan Fillion as an actor. It’s not Firefly, but nothing else is or will ever be.
ETA:
THIS sealed Firefly for me – from the pilot:
My reaction:
Happy New Year, y’all.
Thank You, Peter O’Toole
Well, bummer. Peter O’Toole has died. He’s best known for Lawrence of Arabia, but the film of his I liked best was My Favorite Year, done some twenty years later. A close runner-up was The Lion in Winter.
Thank you, Mr. O’Toole. Safe journey.
Edited to add:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNp10xlCd8Y?rel=0]
Well, They Finally Found Rising Gun Violence Statistics SOMEWHERE…
…other than Chicago, that is.
In PG-13 movies.
When the first “Die Hard” and “Terminator” movies landed in theaters in the 1980s, both were rated R. But their sequels arrived with PG-13 marks — even though the level of violence had actually escalated.
Critics have blasted Hollywood’s movie ratings for years, claiming that the Motion Picture Assn. of America takes a prudish view of sex and foul language but a very liberal one when it comes to mayhem and bloodshed.
A new report provides strong evidence for that critique, concluding that gunplay has tripled within PG-13 films since 1985, the first full year the rating was used. Last year, PG-13 films were actually more violent than films rated R.
—
Researchers found that 94% of the highest-grossing films since 1985 had one or more sequences containing violence. Of those 396 films, gunplay has tripled within the PG-13 rating, while it remained flat or declined in films rated G, PG and R.
And, of course, this cinematic violence is responsible for school shootings:
In addition to quantifying the accelerating levels of violence in blockbuster movies aimed at children and teens, the report also addressed the effect this kind of cinematic bloodshed can have on young moviegoers, which several other investigations have shown can increase hostile behavior.
“The presence of guns in films also provides youth with scripts on how to use guns,” the report said. “In addition, children no longer need to go to movie theaters to see films; films are readily available on the Internet or cable. Thus, children much younger than 13 years can easily view films that contain ample gun violence.”
As The Onion put it,
How else are children going to learn to shoot while jumping sideways?
Holy Crap, the Chicago Tribune?!?
Did someone drop acid in my iced tea? Just let me leave this here:
Stop digging. Start over.
The Americans manhandled by this exercise in government arrogance now find themselves divided into warring tribes: Those with chronic ailments who have found new plans on Obamacare exchanges and are pleased. Those who don’t want or can’t afford the replacement policies Obamacare offers them. Those whose new policies block them from using the health providers who have treated them for many years. The estimated 23 million to 41 million people whose employer-sponsored plans are the next to be imperiled. And on and on.
Most of these tribespeople only wish their big problem was a slipshod Obamacare website. On Thursday, their plight grew more frightful. With even Democratic members of Congress storming the White House over the cancellations, Obama declared — by what legal authority is unclear — that he would overrule the law he signed in 2010 and allow insurers to extend those canceled policies for a year.
—
We understand why the president and leaders of his party want to rescue whatever they can of Obamacare. On their watch, official Washington has blown the launch of a new entitlement program … under the schedule they alone set in early 2010.
What we don’t understand is their reluctance to give that failure more than lip service. Many of the Americans who heard their president say Thursday that “we fumbled the rollout of this health care law” would have been pleased to hear him add: So we’re admitting it. This law is a bust. We’re starting over.
(Bold emphasis mine.) RTWT.
Wow.
Who knew the editors of the Trib were racists?