Seen on Rachel Lucas’ Facebook page.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUGT30gGtiI?rel=0&showinfo=0]
He’d win by a landslide.
The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. – Ayn Rand
Seen on Rachel Lucas’ Facebook page.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUGT30gGtiI?rel=0&showinfo=0]
He’d win by a landslide.
Someone asked, “Why are the presidential candidates so lame this year?”
I answered:
Back in the dim and distant past of the year 2000 when George W. Bush was running against Al Gore, Jr., comedian Lewis Black had the following observation:
In my lifetime we’ve gone from Ike to G.W. Bush.
In my lifetime we’ve gone from JFK to Albert Gore.
If this is evolution, in a few years we’re going to be voting for PLANTS!
Long, long before that, newspaper columnist Henry Louis Mencken said:
As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
Ladies and gentlemen, this may be the election year for Phil O’Dendron.
Hoplophobia: n. a morbid fear of weapons (Col. Jeff Cooper)
Here’s an example:
Growing up, my greatest fear was dying in a school shooting. I still remember: Two boys in black walking into my classroom, one of them holding a stapler at a right angle. I saw the matte black. My mind read: gun. I panicked. I grabbed the arm of the student next to me. “What?” he asked, startled. I started shaking and laughing and breathing and sweating. The boys were only stopping in to see if my math teacher had any extra staples. They were not there to kill us, me first in the front row.
As long as guns exist, I don’t have a chance of saving the world. I feel useless against daily tragedy, against assault rifles and bullets. Here is something humiliating: I am afraid to write all this. Some people love guns. I do not love guns. I wish fewer people owned guns. Often, I wish no one owned guns. I realize many people will disagree with me, and I do not want someone who loves guns to hurt me.
What pathetic hubris! “As long as guns exist, I don’t have a chance of saving the world.” You sure your shoulders are strong enough for that load?
And sweetheart? Let Mr. Spock soothe your fears:
I do not have answers. I do not know which kinds of guns should be allowed and what types of background checks are most effective.
(And on a very personal note: I deal with mental illness every day….
This is my shocked face.
I visited the author’s Twitter feed. I found that she had re-tweeted one by Matt Taibbi:
Putting aside the gun control argument for a moment, I wish people could simply agree that in an ideal world, there would be no guns.
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 3, 2015
That prompted me to write my fourth Tweet ever:
A world with no guns? It’s run by large men with swords and is not “equal,” “fair,” “safe,” or “democratic.” https://t.co/W1v4pA1Zwe
— smallestminorty (@smallestminorty) December 14, 2015
This is what we’re up against, folks. Magical thinking and mental illness.
My favorite local Merchant O’Death reports:
So, three days after the shooting in San Bernardino and we still have ARs on the shelf. As a matter of fact, we have sold a whopping total of TWO ARs and have put one on layaway. No other type of “assault rifle” has left the shop. I have yet to sell a single hi-cap mag for any type of long gun. Still have plenty of .223/5.56, .308, 7.62X39, 9mm, .40, .45ACP, .380 auto, .38 Special…..hell, we have a lot of everything except .22LR and .22 Mag.
We have been really busy the last three days for sure. I would attribute that to the usual hustle and bustle of the coming holiday but I know better. I have yet to hear a customer say “I want to get my husband/wife/boyfriend/girlfriend a gun for Christmas….” Judging by some of the purchases I have no doubt that some of the firearms being bought are to be stashed under the tree. Most of them are obviously being purchased to be stashed in purse or pocket.
Compact, concealable handguns are making a mass exodus along with spare magazines/speed loaders and the attendant ammunition. The majority of the buyers are older folks, men and women, couples and singles The usual “tacti-cool” crowd are noticeable by their absence. A large proportion of the buyers are inquiring about CCW classes as well as basic firearms handling courses and public ranges.
While there is no sense of hysteria among our patrons, there is an increasing amount of concern being voiced. Not so much about the political climate but more about the fact that the shooters in California had links to terrorists organizations in the Middle East. I do sense a bit of shock in a lot of folks as if they have finally realized that the threat is very real and not just something that happens “over there”.
I would imagine that the SAR show in Phoenix this weekend is doing a land office business. I’ll be interested to see what Monday brings. I do believe that POTUS is going to address the nation tomorrow regarding the recent event. This should be stunning….
I wonder if Tam is seeing similar things in Indiana.
ETA, 12/10/15: The Washington Post reports:
Read the whole thing.
As I’ve said here and on other fora, if you really want to do something about homicide by firearm then you need to pay attention to who’s doing the killing, who’s doing the dying, and where it is taking place. ProPublica has an article out, How the Gun Control Debate Ignores Black Lives, on this topic, and the title to this post is THE pullquote from it.
Some other choice selections:
In 2012, 90 people were killed in shootings like the ones in Newtown and Aurora, Colorado. That same year, nearly 6,000 black men were murdered with guns.
—
Mass shootings, unsurprisingly, drive the national debate on gun violence. But as horrific as these massacres are, by most counts they represent less than 1 percent of all gun homicides. America’s high rate of gun murders isn’t caused by events like Sandy Hook or the shootings this fall at a community college in Oregon. It’s fueled by a relentless drumbeat of deaths of black men.
Gun control advocates and politicians frequently cite the statistic that more than 30 Americans are murdered with guns every day. What’s rarely mentioned is that roughly 15 of the 30 are black men.
Avoiding that fact has consequences. Twenty years of government-funded research has shown there are several promising strategies to prevent murders of black men, including Ceasefire. They don’t require passing new gun laws, or an epic fight with the National Rifle Association. What they need — and often struggle to get — is political support and a bit of money.
—
Lost in the debate is that even in high-crime cities, the risk of gun violence is mostly concentrated among a small number of men. In Oakland, for instance, crime experts working with the police department a few years ago found that about 1,000 active members of a few dozen street groups drove most homicides. That’s .3 percent of Oakland’s population.
—
Two weeks after Obama unveiled his plan, (Pastor Michael) McBride and dozens of other clergy members, many of them from cities struggling with high rates of gun violence, met again with staffers from Vice President Biden’s task force.
The mood at the January 29 meeting was tense. Many of the attendees, including McBride, felt the president’s agenda had left out black Americans.
“The policy people working for Biden worked with the reality of Congress,” said Teny Gross, one of the original Boston Miracle outreach workers who now leads the Institute for Nonviolence Chicago. “What they were proposing to us was very limited and was not going to help the inner city.”
Gross said he “blew a gasket.” The clergy members in the room were pleading for help. “We bury hundreds of kids every year in the inner city,” Gross recalled them telling the administration representative. “Some of the solutions need to apply to us.”
A staffer said that the political will of the country was not focused on urban violence, several ministers who attended the meeting recalled.
“What was said to us by the White House was, there’s really no support nationally to address the issue of urban violence,” said the Rev. Charles Harrison, a pastor from Indianapolis. “The support was to address the issue of gun violence that affected suburban areas — schools where white kids were killed.”
The Rev. Jeff Brown, from Boston, was angered by the administration’s calculated approach. “When you say something like that and you represent the President of the United States, and the first African-American President of the United States, you know, that’s hugely disappointing,” he said.
It would seem that Obama’s a huge disappointment to a lot of people.
RTWT. And especially the comments.
Well, I’ve been temporarily blocked at Quora.com for violating their “Be Nice, Be Polite” policy. Can’t post there until October 30. In the mean time, I guess I can still post here!
If you’re unfamiliar, Quora is a site where anybody can ask anything, and anybody who joins up can respond.
Ran across this jewel over there and thought I’d share it. The question asked was, “What will it take to radically change America’s gun culture?” Like there’s only one.
Seems this guy thinks he’s struck upon something original.
Avoiding getting dragged into the gun control debate and attempting to answer your original question, I would say there are at least two options, both of which would be lengthy and difficult in application. First, like cigarettes, the government could embark on a long term effort of making gun ownership and gun use difficult and expensive, while propagandizing against equating guns with generally positive terms such as “liberty” and “freedom”, instead instilling in future generations the association of guns with negatives such as “murder” and “anti-social”. Realizing that a goodly number of people holding social and political power in the US are themselves gun nuts, you can imagine this is a remote possibility. Equally problematic is the idea of revolutionary change in the US which removes all notions of American exceptionalism, militarism and conservative ideology from popular thought.
Summing up, the two paths I see involve public “shaming” of gun people in the same manner as smokers are publically(sic) shamed today, or the active suppression of what I think are really defining characteristics of America: conservative ideology, religious ideology, fierce individualism, a tendency towards conspiracy theory, a preference for violence as a solution to social and individual problems, and mistrust of government. As you might guess, I’m not optimistic.
As Instapundit once said, “It’s pretty irritating, being shamed by people who have none themselves.”
He apparently doesn’t realize that his prescription is precisely how it was done in the UK. I have to wonder, though, at what form his “active suppression” would take. What’s most interesting to me however, is what he himself describes as the “really defining characteristics of America,”
You begin to understand Barack Obama’s appeal to people like him when Obama promised to fundamentally transform the United States of America.
They’re ashamed of it. They hate it.
So yeah, I do think they’re un-American. They admit it themselves.
Sorry for the hiatus. Busy, and I’ve been engaging over at Quora.com. Got a couple of essays rattling around in the back of my head, but in the meantime, here’s Bill Whittle’s latest:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvEhSkRG9f8?rel=0]
CSPAN is here. And it will be livestreamed here.