Hey! The Carnival is Coming!

Yeesh! It’s only a week away!

The next Carnival of the Vanities will be hosted by your humble servant right here at The Smallest Minority on Wednesday, August 11. Please submit your entries by no later than Tuesday, August 10 at 8:00PM PDT so that I can throw them in a pile arrange them in some artful manner for your perusal.

To submit, email me at gunrights -AT- comcast -DOT- net (please substitute the proper symbols) with your name or nom-de-plume, the name and URL of your blog, the title (if applicable) and URL of your post of interest, and a short blurb describing the topic.

Edited to add: Put “CotV” or “Carnival” in the email title, would you? That way I won’t dump it as spam without ever opening it.

Another edit: Please, no late entries! I won’t be anywhere near a computer with internet access on Wednesday, so what goes up Tuesday night will be IT.

(Like I need something ELSE to do!)

See What Crawls Out When You Roll Over the Rotten Log?

The barking moonbat wing of the Left has gone bugshit over Rachel Lucas’s favorite T-Shirt. Well, Glenn Reynolds owns one, (I own one, too) so Atrios thought it must be racist, and wrote a post about it. Here’s his take:

Now, Glenn’s a gun fan and I imagine he’s just celebrating the joys of guns, or whatever, but this shirt is no joke. There’s a serious subtext here which is totally obvious to me that I think should be pointed out. Now, I don’t think everyone who has purchased a shirt like this has purchased it with the subtext in mind, but nonetheless the message is clear.
The caption is “celebrate diversity.” The colors of the caption are commonly used pan-African colors: red, yellow, and green. While, for many, the “joke” (though, I’m not sure why it’s funny) is that here diversity is a diversity of guns. Ha ha. But, look, the clear message here is that the way to celebrate diversity, particularly that pan-African diversity, is to buy a bunch of fucking guns. In other words, celebrate diversity by arming yourself.

And your problem with that is….? But no, it means “celebrate diversity” by buying a bunch of different guns. (The fucking guns” is a dead giveaway that Atrios is not a “gun fan.” Please pardon my stating the obvious.)
You’ll note that the shirt doesn’t say “Hey white folk! Celebrate diversity!” Nope, it’s an equal opportunity shirt! Everybody join in! All colors of the rainbow, you too can join the nation of responsible citizens who own guns! It’s not just for white crackers anymore!

But the commenters ran with it. Here’s a sample of the bile from the more loving, more caring, colorblind, fuzzy-bunny Left.

I read a much darker subtext into that.

(A)nd, I presume, shoot as many pan-Africans as possible, maybe even a few queers, since the colors are also reminiscent of the gay flag.
Welcome to more and more fascism.

Nope, they get to buy guns, too!

I thought it was more sinister than even your interpretation. I read it as “Celebrate Diversity — kill a black person.”

You get secret messages passed to you in your alphabet soup, too, don’t you?

Maybe Instapoodle can be encouraged to play Russian Roulette more often.

Nothing like the Compassionate Left, is there?

…it says to me “kill the black, brown, yellow, red, …”. Sometimes I wonder if women and non-whites just get it, because they have encountered it so much.

The subtext is much darker and the “kill a nigger because he stole your job because of affirmative action” is even there. (Now it’s morphed into “because he stole your JOB.” It’s a T-SHIRT, you oversensitive idiot.)

I think you put as charitable a spin on it as possible, Atrios, but the fact that it took you several hours to decide how to frame your thoughts on it I think is a resonable indicator of how deeply disturbing you find it.

The fact that you saw it, reacted in such a way as to say to yourself, “No, that can’t be right. They can’t mean THAT”, and then give them the benefit of the doubt to the extent you reasonably could, well, I think that speaks volumes in and of itself. Your thought processes – if you want to actually characterize them as such – certainly speak volumes about you.

Right wingers equate guns with power.
Mao: Power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

This, the right wing endorses greatly. This is why they are always sore losers in elections.And now MAO is a right-winger? How far left is THIS guy? As for “sore losers,” who is it that hasn’t gotten over the 2000 election?

The message I see is”Here’s what you can do with your goddamned diversity!” There is a subtext of hate in that t-shirt.Only what you put there.

The fact that the shirt is (I would presume) purposefully vague enough to lend itself to these ugly interpretations, would make me uncomfortable to wear it — regardless of my stance on gun rights.

That’s called “freedom of choice” where it comes to freedom of speech. At least this guy’s not a complete whack job.

How about a t-shirt with “Republican Diversity” as the text–and show a bunch of grave markers?

The t-shirt celebrates guns and hints how they could be used. If it was worn in public in Toronto it would cause problems because it is a very aggressive shirt.Only because Canada doesn’t have a right to free speech, and I could insert a Canadian joke here, but I choose not to.

I read it as an anti-minority statement.

HOW? Minorities have the same right to buy guns as anybody.

One could draw the ‘kill Africans’ inference, but that’s a stretch. These guys are racists and all that, but the point of the T-Shirt is pro-gun rights, and anti-diversity-type legislation, nothing else.

No, it’s just pro-gun rights. For everybody.

Of course this is the same guy who wrote:

We need guns, and when the technology permits, we’re gonna need automatic guns, or automatic tasers, or whatever. If Bushco wants to become the next Hitler, he’s gonna have to answer Mr. Colt – which I don’t own *yet*, but I may soon. I’m tired of being scared of some black van screaching up to my front door, with me being defenseless. F that. Come and get me aholes, but first, say hello to my leetle friend!

Well, hell! Celebrate diversity and get a Smith & Wesson too, while you’re at it!

The only person who would wear this shirt is, quite literally, a racist piece of shit.

Smile when you say that.

There is no doubt that this shirt has a wink-and-nudge racist message behind it, and I think any right-winger would get it.

Nope. Only you overly sensitive Lefties.

Don’t call him racist. He’ll pull out the old line “My sister in law is African” routine, which of course is a show stopper.

It is, isn’t it? Just like the fact that Bush has a black National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. But they can’t really be “black” because they’re just “house niggers” workin’ for da man.

More of that Leftist compassion and caring.

But wait! There’s more!

Sorry, but the message of that hideous shirt is pretty clear to me. If it had been beer, I would have thought, ha! Cute! Be diverse in your choice of getting drunk. This is guns, though. And not just guns, hand guns. Be diverse in your choice of killing.
And don’t think these miserable, twisted wingnuts don’t know EXACTLY what it means.

We sure do, but the “twisted wingnuts” seem to be on YOUR side, my friend.

I thought Glenn was urging us to buy an assortment of guns, go to Africa and shoot as many blacks as possible. The subtext was crystal clear to me and I’m outraged. How do they get away with this!?

Because most people don’t think like barking moonbats with their panties wingnuts in a twist?

The t-shirt, and the entire website, are indicative of mental illness.

Funny, I was thinking precisely the same thing about Atrios’s site and these comments!

I actually saw someone wearing that shirt last night in West Oakland. Someone who happened to African-American. I must say that, in that context, I thought the shirt was fucking phat.

There, see? Apparently that t-shirt owner got the idea. But also apparently it’s up to the moonbat Left to inform him of just how misguided he must be to wear something so offensive.

You’re right. It is phat!

So of course, that poster must have been a right-wing plant. No black African-American could possibly misinterpret the meaning of that shirt, right?

I invite Instapundit or anyone else who finds the shirt amusing to don it proudly on the streets of East LA, the Tenderloin, Gary, IN, Detroit or DC (away from the Capitol, of course), especially around 2am.

I invite all supporters of gun control to do precisely the same thing! Go to those areas at that time completely unarmed! And tell us just how safe you are!

Anyway, there’s more, but that’s enough and more than enough, don’t you think?

I did leave a comment of my own, though:

First, I own the shirt. It’s humorous to me. Second, I do not, did not and cannot interpret it the way (many of) you have. If you want to accuse me of being “a racist piece of shit,” I suggest you do it to my face. And third, if you hate that T-shirt, you’re gonna loathe this one.

The link is to the “72 Virgins Dating Service” T-shirt.

THAT drew some traffic!

Sweet Jeebus’s Bleeding Hemorrhoids…

Hear about this one? The 42 year-old Australian security guard who was brutally assaulted by a thief wearing brass knuckles who was after the pub receipts she was carrying? She picked herself up, drew her concealed weapon, approached, and then shot the sumbitch. She’s been charged with murder! Here’s one version of the story:

Guard set for murder charge

A SYDNEY security guard tonight became a fugitive after refusing to submit herself to police for questioning over the shooting death of a thief during a bungled robbery.

Bungled my ass. She properly intervened.

If Karen Brown cannot be found she will be charged in her absence tomorrow morning.

Police had given Ms Brown until 6pm (AEST) today to present herself at Liverpool police station in south-west Sydney for an interview over her shooting of William Aquilina last Monday.

The 42-year-old Rooty Hill woman did not show and it was unclear whether she had been aware of the ultimatum.

Liverpool police Superintendent Terry Jacobsen said police tried to contact Ms Brown through her lawyers with phone calls and text messages throughout the day.

Her lawyers could not be reached by AAP.

Ms Brown allegedly shot and killed Aquilina moments after he attacked her with a knuckleduster and stole a bag of cash she was carrying out of the Moorebank Hotel.

She was originally scheduled to speak with officers on Tuesday, saying she was too unwell to talk before then.

But she raised the ire of police when it emerged she had given two media interviews, one of which was understood to have netted her a six figure payment.

“We have given her that opportunity but she has elected to go to the media, and that’s not appropriate,” Supt Jacobsen said.

He said Ms Brown’s non-attendance meant police would charge her with murder either tonight or tomorrow morning.

“We have sufficient evidence in my view of a prima facie case of murder,” he said.

Commencing criminal proceedings could make the airing of Ms Brown’s exclusive interview on tomorrow evening’s edition of Today Tonight in contempt of court.

“It will be sub judice and Today Tonight will publish any material at their peril,” Supt Jacobsen warned.

The officer condemned Ms Brown’s decision to tell the media her story instead of police.”

Channel Seven spokesman Simon Francis said the network still planned to air the program.
“Regardless of what happens we will be telling her story tomorrow night,” he said.

Mr Francis refused to confirm Seven had paid Ms Brown $100,000 for the interview but said the amount was substantially less than an offer by rival Channel Nine.

Mr Aquilina’s grandfather Frank Rasmussen accused Ms Brown of profiteering from his grandson’s death.

“She’s getting blood money, that’s all I can say,” he told Channel Nine.

Ms Brown said in an interview with today’s Sunday Telegraph that she was sorry for Mr Aquilina’s family.

“I really feel sorry for his family, it must be awful,” she said.

She said she feared for her life but after the attack had no recollection of events.

“I was so scared,” she said.

“I did not know where I was or exactly what had happened to me. All I knew was that blood was pouring into my eyes and my head was throbbing.”

Sounds bad, right? However:

TV payout will go towards legal defence

A SYDNEY security guard who shot and killed a robber last week was not trying to profit from the tragedy, her mother said today.Karen Brown shot William Aquilina, 25, after he assaulted her and robbed her of a bag of money outside the Moorebank Hotel in Sydney’s south-west last Monday.

Her mother, Beverley Brown, said she believed her daughter would be paid $100,000 by Channel 7’s Today Tonight program for an interview to be broadcast tonight.
“To my knowledge it is that amount of money ($100,000). I haven’t actually seen a cheque or anything like that.”

Beverley Brown said the money would be used to fund her daughter’s defence.

Damned good idea, IMHO.

And then there’s this version:

Bashed guard has skull fractured in attack

By Evelyn Yamine
July 30, 2004

THE security guard who shot and killed a man during a bungled armed robbery could not be interviewed by police yesterday because her injuries had worsened.

Karen Brown was kept in hospital after tests revealed that her skull and nose were fractured and she had trouble seeing out of one eye.

Ms Brown was supposed to give a statement to police about Monday’s armed robbery outside the Moorebank Hotel, Monday, where Ms Brown shot William Aquilina in the head.

Ms Brown was hit in the head with a knuckle-duster during the attack.

She was seen by an orthopedic and eye specialist yesterday and underwent a brain scan.

“She’s got a fractured skull and a fractured nose and there have been some other medical issues,” Mr Busuttil said.

There are suspicions she may have some fractured bones in her body.”

She may now need to remain in hospital for further tests.

Detective Chief Inspector Nick Bingham said Ms Brown’s statement was imperative to the investigation.

“We would like to speak to her sooner rather than later but we’re mindful of the fact she did receive fairly serious injuries,” he said.

Ms Brown is expected to meet with police some time next week.

A post mortem examination conducted on Wednesday showed Aquilina died from blood loss due to a bullet in the face. The bullet was found still lodged in his head.

Police are waiting on toxicology reports. “It may be a factor in relation to his actions but that’s probably still six weeks away,” Insp Bingham said.

Aquilina’s parents, Anne and Michael, last night apologised to Ms Brown for the assault. They told A Current Affair their son was not one to hold a grudge and have decided to be the same.
“I’ve got no hard feelings,” Mr Aquilina said. “Maybe there could have been another way of doing it but I don’t know.

“If I knew what he was doing I would have stopped him.”

Mrs Aquilina added: “I’m sorry for what he did, I am really, really sorry, that’s all I want to say. He would not be cranky, he was so forgiving.”

Aquilina’s grandfather, ex-policeman Frank Rasmussen, said Ms Brown had been in no danger and should be charged with manslaughter or murder.

“She’s done the wrong thing … we’ve all done the wrong thing, but she’s done worse, she took a person’s life,” he said.

Mr. Rasmussen can go suck dead dog farts for all I care. Here’s another story on it:

Why I killed the robber

THE security guard who shot and killed a robber who bashed her has spoken about her ordeal for the first time.

Shaking and crying, a traumatised Karen Brown, 42, said yesterday she had feared for her life as she was punched in the head several times by William Aquilina, who was armed with a knuckle duster.

“I was so scared,” she said of the ambush and shooting outside a hotel in Sydney’s southwest last Monday morning.

Ms Brown suffered a fractured skull, a fractured eye socket, a fractured nose, a fractured left hand and possible brain damage when the 25-year-old grabbed her hair, king-hit her and then battered her to the ground.

The convicted criminal then dragged her across the bitumen towards a stolen getaway car before she could release a bag containing between $30,000 and $50,000 in hotel takings. Moments later, a bleeding Ms Brown, who was dressed in casual clothes and whose gun had been concealed, shot Aquilina as he sat in the car.

Surrounded by her family, Ms Brown tried to recall the incident that left her covered in blood in the hotel car park.

“I looked up through a bloody haze,” Ms Brown said. “I did not know where I was or exactly what had happened to me. All I knew was that blood was pouring into my eyes and my head was throbbing.”

Despite her injuries, which also include severe concussion and a floating bone fragment behind her eyeball, Ms Brown said she felt sympathy for Aquilina’s family and expressed remorse for what had occurred.

“I really feel sorry for his family,” said Ms Brown, who has been a security guard for four years.

“It must be awful. I just wish this had never happened. It’s been a terrible week.”

Ms Brown had been collecting and banking the pub’s takings for the past five months.
“Nothing like this has ever happened before and nothing prepares you for this,” she said.
Ms Brown’s sister, Katrina, said the incident had been devastating.

“It has completely wrecked her life,” she said at the Sydney home Ms Brown shares with her de facto, George Muratore. “She’s a complete mental and physical wreck. This is the worst thing that’s ever happened in her life. She has never hurt anybody or anything before and it’s completely crushed her.”

Mr Muratore’s father, Vic, 73, said he believed Ms Brown should not be punished.

“She should not be charged — I would have done the same thing,” he said. “If you pay me to protect, I have to protect. Everybody reckons she’s a champion.

“We have known her for seven years and she is a very decent person — she is a good person.

“I say sorry for the other people, but you deserve what you get when you do something like that.”

But Aquilina’s grandfather, retired policeman Frank Rasmussen, has said Ms Brown should be charged.

Right. Only the police should have the power to shoot criminals?

“He was murdered,” Mr Rasmussen said. “That woman should have torn into that hotel as soon as she alleges she was hit and she should have asked for help. Instead, she advanced on my grandson and shot him in cold blood.

No, she was severely injured – by your grandson – and probably disoriented, and still did her job, which was to prevent his escaping with the loot, you prick.

“She’s just a bitch. Sorry.”

No, you’re an asshole. And I’m NOT sorry.

Mr Rasmussen said he was upset by how his grandson — who has convictions for drugs and robbery — had been portrayed.

“They’re saying he’s a rotten dangerous criminal and he’s not. He’s lovable,” he said. “We still don’t believe he’s done this on his own — he’s too good a person.

Yes, I’m sure he was just a lovable fuzzball as he punched Ms. Brown in the head multiple times. Don’t make me puke. He was a perfect fucking ANGEL I bet. But now he’s DEAD.

“He’s never been involved in anything like this in almost 26 years that we’ve known him. It’s not in his nature.”

Guess the brass knuckles weren’t his, either?

One thing’s for damned sure. He won’t be “involved in anything like this” again.

Ms Brown underwent further medical tests on Thursday. Detectives are not expecting to speak to her until tomorrow.

For a nation founded by cast-off convicts from Mother England, they sure seem to be sucking from the same teat of nanny-state enforced pacifism. For example, try this (unrelated) story:

Good Samaritans set upon by gang

A NIGHT out in inner-city Brisbane ended in violence for a family of good Samaritans who tried to intervene in a vicious gang attack.

The Jackson siblings of Sunnybank found themselves fighting for their lives after standing up to a bunch of “cowardly” youths who brutally kicked a man while he was on the ground at the corner of Edward and Charlotte streets.

Dr Peter Jackson, 28, was king-hit and knocked unconscious after running to help the man – who himself ran off and left the Jacksons to face the gang.

Brother John, 24, jumped into the fray to help his older sibling, but was overwhelmed by a swarm of angry youths aged 16 to 19 as he desperately tried to reach his stricken brother.

Enter sisters Elizabeth, 21, and Bridgette, 19. Trying to avoid blows from the gang of youths, the sisters pulled the attackers off Peter, who was unconscious for more than five minutes.

John later expressed disgust that a gathering crowd did not raise a finger to help.

“It was really un-Australian to see, but then again that has become the Australian way,” he said. “The gutless people watching them in the background couldn’t even help two girls.”

The family had been out to farewell John, who is off to Europe tomorrow, when they saw the gang attack a man by himself.

“(Peter) said, ‘Get away, get away.’ They just started walking away and then one of them took a step towards him and that just launched the rest of them on to Pete,” Elizabeth said.

“A guy came up and punched him in the back of the head and I think that was when he was knocked out. He went to ground and the guys didn’t leave him alone.”

John said his brother had half the attackers on him and “I had the other half”.

“Four or five of them cornered me and this massive hit came from somewhere,” he said. “I was just getting swamped.”

Elizabeth said there were “so many people around” who would not help.

“So Bridgette and I just went in and literally started grabbing these guys by their hoods and their jumpers,” she said.

“We were trying to pull them off one by one. One of them took a swing at Bridgette but it missed.

“(Afterwards) some bouncers came over after Pete had been on the ground for five minutes.
“They just said, ‘Oh, he’s all right, call the cops,’ and just walked across the road.”

The Jackson clan had no regrets yesterday, and appealed for public assistance to identify the attackers.

“I would do it again, definitely,” Peter said. “Some of the horrendous brain injuries you are unfortunate enough to see (in medicine) – you just don’t wish that on your worst enemy. They are vegetables (and) one or two more kicks and that guy could have been in massive trouble.”

Police sources told The Courier-Mail the force was 49 staff short in Brisbane City, but due to get 20 first-year constables soon.

They said it was a busy night on Saturday.

No word on how long it took for the police to show up, assuming they did.

Good thing none of the attackers had a weapon, isn’t it? Like, say, brass knuckles? Or a knife? Or even *gasp!* a gun?

Anybody Looking for a Good Deal?



Jim from Smoke on the Water is looking to sell part of his collection to finance a trip. If you’re a resident of Tejas, you can use the ELGS™ to purchase “off-paper,” or, if you’re a resident of another state, he’ll ship to your FFL dealer. Jim’s looking to sell a Ruger Security-Six, a blued 4″ barreled .357 Magnum revolver. Rugers are known for their reliability and ruggedness – if six rounds of hollowpoint don’t do it, you can bludgeon the perp to death with it. It is blued with adjustable sights.

Jim advises:

Now, only one very minute flaw exists in the Ruger I’m selling. A tiny, tiny point of pitting had started on the edge of the trigger-guard before the gun came into my possession. It has been treated, leaving behind a point of lightness in the blueing, which is no larger than the diameter of a fine pencil-lead. Frankly, it’s damn near imperceptable, but I’d be less than perfectly honest if I failed mention it.

My reserve is $325, plus the $30 for insured shipping to the FFL dealer of your choice.







Just for the record, this gun truly is surplus to my needs. My S&W Model 28 is all the .357 I’ll ever need, and I’ll be just as happy (happier, given the circumstances) with the cash. In short, I’m not parting with a sentimental icon which ought to stay in the family.

It’s just a gun, but a damned nice one. And it’s for sale.

I’d give him an offer myself, but I just blew my accumulated gun-money on a Ruger Single-Six (that cost, retail, almost as much as Jim’s opening reserve – so it’s a good deal. Go make a bid to SOTW_Jim -AT – hotmail -DOT- com. Replace the -AT- and -DOT- with the appropriate symbols. (DIE, SPAMBOTS, DIE!)

Hive Minds

Francis Porretto has another illuminating essay up on the (and I use the term loosely) thought processes of the collectivist Left vis-à-vis Western individualism vs. Islam, in Hive Minds.

It’s worth your time. (But then, Francis always is.)

OK, I Was Wrong

I admit it.  I’ve said on numerous occasions that I thought the Dims would figure out that Kerry wasn’t electable and they’d replace him like they replaced Torricelli in N.J., but it appears that they’ve convinced themselves that Kerry’s can win.

Of course, they’ve got 100 days to figure out that he can’t and really do a Torricelli on him, but I don’t think that’ll happen now.

Mea culpa.

They Have No Shame

First reported here back in March in Stick a Fork in England. They’re Done, the British government has found that people erroneously convicted of crime tend to sue once they’re released from incarceration, and they tend to win pretty fair settlements.  So in order to recover some of the swag, they’ve developed this really neat idea:  Charge for room and board!

That’s right, since the plaintiff received a room and three squares a day, they can be backcharged for it!  Prison is just a big Motel 6 with room service!  

Mr. Free Market reports  the latest such incident in which two men have been billed 25% of the awards that they received for being wrongly convicted.  From the BBC:

Innocent men must pay prison bill
 
Two men wrongly jailed for murder for 18 years must pay for the money they saved in “board and lodgings” while in prison, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Cousins Michael and Vincent Hickey were convicted of murdering newspaper boy Carl Bridgewater in November 1979.

An independent assessor ruled their “loss of earnings” compensation should be cut by 25% to cover living expenses.

The High Court overturned the ruling – but the assessor appealed, arguing it had been “lawful and reasonable”.

Lord Brennan QC, the Home Office-appointed assessor, had awarded Michael Hickey, 42, £990,000, ($1,800,000 US) and Vincent Hickey, 49, £506,220, ($921,000 US) subject to deductions for expenses which they would have incurred as free men.

But in April 2003, High Court judge Mr Justice Maurice Kay ruled the deductions were unlawful.
 
On Thursday, after Lord Brennan’s successful appeal, the cousins’ solicitor said they were “extremely disappointed” by the Appeal Court’s “palpably unfair” decision, and were considering appealing to the House of Lords.

Stigmatised as child killers, they had been subjected to appalling treatment in prison, Susie Labinjoh, of Hodge Jones & Allen, added. Their food had regularly been adulterated with phlegm and glass.

They had been “outraged” by the deductions, Ms Labinjoh said.

“They could not comprehend how anyone aware of the circumstances of their imprisonment could suggest that they profited from it in any way.

Mr. Free Market – a resident of England comments:

The issue here is not if the men were ultimately cleared on a technicality or ‘miraculous new evidence that has just come to light’ – it is whether the State can illegally detain you & then charge you for the privilege of doing so. Gordon ‘tax & waste’ Brown must be rubbing his grubby mits with glee – a whole new revenue source for him to fritter away.

As for the Court of Appeal – have you all gone stark raving aardvark?? As you speak as outsiders, what do you think of the human race?? Or have too many years living in Judge’s Chambers & hitting the tax payer funded vintage port, finally done for you?? This is shear unmitigated madness ……… maybe next time these judicial numpties take a sunny stroll on insanity beach, maybe they should stop for a minute & dip a toe into the sea of reason.

Word of advice:  Don’t hold your breath.

Another word:  Emigrate.  England is done.  Stick a fork in it.

My Favorite Liberal

Has a pretty good post up.  The eternally optimistic Dean Esmay waxes eloquent on the two-party system, game theory, pragmatism, and political conventions.  Excerpt:

Half a loaf, half a loaf, half a loaf onward. Yet it’s not a charge into oblivion, but a charge into what’s right. Over a period of years, maybe a period of decades, the American people will eventually find their way to the right answer.

When you look at the candidates for President every four years, you must look at all of this. The Republican will ride to power speaking of stern, strong, unyielding principles that he will inevitably compromise upon. The Democrat will inevitably rise to power out of a squabbling mess of fractious ideologies, attempting to meld them into a semi-coherent whole. Neither one will be virginal, both will be a little full of shit–but both of them (usually) sincere. In most cases, both will genuinely want what is best for America. Your only question will be whether you think their vision is the right vision, and whether you believe he will govern responsibly, and will take the duties of his office sincerely.

Give it a read.