At the Smith & Wesson booth:

The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. – Ayn Rand
At the Smith & Wesson booth:

Got out of class at 11:30, got to the GRB Convention center by about 12:30, drove around for half an hour trying to find a parking lot closer than half a mile away and failed. Finally got to the media room a few minutes ago and got my credentials. Now I’m sitting at a table in the media room with Nancy R., Jay G., and Ambulance Driver.
Had dinner last night with those three and:
Weer’d Beard
Michael
In Jennifer’s Head
Gay Cynic
Sandcastle Scrolls and family
Phlegmfatale
Old NFO
LawDog
Expert Witness
TOTWTYTR
Smoke on the Water
No Lawyers – Only Guns and Money
Snooze Button Ronin
And a couple of readers/commenters. If I missed anyone, my apologies.
Cool!! Time to hit the convention floor. Looking forward to the rest of the weekend.

Today is the fifth annual Victims of Communism Day, a day to remember the people murdered by their own governments in their quest to achieve a “worker’s paradise” where everyone is equal, where “to each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities” is the beautiful dream lie. R.J. Rummel, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Hawaii, has calculated that the total number of victims of Communism – that is, the domestic victims of their own governments – in the USSR, China, Vietnam, North Korea and Cambodia is 98.4 million people. For all Communist governments during the 20th Century, he puts the estimate at approximately 110 million. And this wasn’t in warfare against other nations, this was what these governments did to their own people – “breaking eggs” to make their utopian omlette.
Six million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust, and another six million people the Nazis decided were “undesirable” went with them. “Never again” is the motto of the modern Jew, and many others just as dedicated. But “again and again and again” seems to be the rebuke of history.
The Communists are hardly alone in these crimes. Rummel estimates that the total number of people murdered by their own governments during the 20th Century is on the close order of 262 million, but the single biggest chunk of that truly frightening number is directly due to one pernicious idea: That we can make people better.
Why do I own guns? For a number of reasons, but one of them is this:
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? — Alexandr Solzhenitzyn, The Gulag Archipelago
—
The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed – where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once. — Judge Alex Kozinski, dissenting, Silveira v. Lockyer, denial to re-hear en banc, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 2003.
I intend to repeat this post each May 1 that I continue to run this blog. This is the fourth time I have put it up.
Two years ago, Sipsey Street Irregulars had a post to go along with this one. STRONGLY RECOMMENDED.
UPDATE: This year, Not Clausewitz has a worthy addition.
From his post How it Works in Gun-Free Paradise:
After those rollicking crazy Boston boys blasted an eight-year-old into oblivion, they did a little workout at the gym and planned to head to New York City to party party party. A problemo surfaces…they only had one pistol. I mean, two terrorists, one pistol, not gonna look good on FaceBook, n’est-ce pas? So did the boys race to an Internet cafe to buy maybe a dozen or so full-auto assault weapons off the Internet, with same-day shipping? Speed to a LGS for the “Tuesday Terrorist Two-Fer, No NCIS No Way”? Wait for the weekend gun show where they could stock up on RPGs, grenades and those rifles with the shoulder thingie that sticks up?
None of the above. Instead, they went to the one firearms superstore where they were sure guns would be in stock…they walked up to the police car of MIT Officer Sean Collier, killed him in very cold blood and tried to grab his gun. The reason those lovable Holden Caulfield-esque urchins failed on that task was that apparently the Islamic Terrorism 101 class on the Internet doesn’t include retention holsters, disabling of. Don’t worry…I’m sure the curriculum will be updated any moment now!
Man, if we’d only had a law that made it illegal to transfer a gun without a background check! That would have stopped them dead in their tracks!
I literally laughed out loud. Watch it to the end:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R6Ibz31DtE?rel=0]
SO WHEN DEMOCRATS ARE PUSHING TO BAN PEOPLE ON THE “TERROR WATCH LIST” FROM BUYING GUNS, they’re really pushing to have a constitutional right blocked by your placement on a secret list put together by unaccountable bureaucrats with no due process. Just to be clear what they’re really talking about. — Instapundit
RTWT.
So in my recent post Gun Control, I stated:
…enough people now refuse to take the blame for something we didn’t do that we’re politically powerful. We refuse to be shamed. We reject shaming. And as Instapundit put it recently
It’s pretty irritating, being shamed by people who have none themselves.
And in my more recent post Oh Yeah, the Anti-Gun Activists are Stoked Now!, I noted that a recent anti-gun protest in D.C. drew a light crowd. Well, there’s been some further reporting by the Washington Free Beacon. Pertinent excerpts:
Between 50 and 60 people gathered to march through D.C.’s lobbying corridor, stopping to chant and hoist Fairey’s poster at offices that do business with the nation’s largest Second Amendment organization.
“Down with lobbyists! Down with the NRA!” the protesters shouted. “Shame on the lobbyists! Shame on the NRA!”
—
The purpose, organizers said, was to shame not only the NRA but also the lobbying shops that worked with them to stymie gun-control legislation.
But this is priceless!
Some brief confusion ensued Thursday when protesters arrived at the first nondescript office building and no one could remember which lobbying firm was located inside.
“Whatever, we’ll get it to them later,” one organizer told another after milling about for a few minutes. “Let’s not stand around looking like idiots.”
TOO LATE!
And, in relation to my post “Nobody Wants to Take Your Guns”:
“The main problem with gun legislation and gun violence is the permissivity of ownership,” John Schuster, a D.C. resident, told the Washington Free Beacon as the group trundled down K Street.
Schuster did not consider the Second Amendment an individual right, as the Supreme Court has ruled it to be.
The ideal solution to guns, Schuster said, would be to “repeal the Second Amendment and replace it with something the Supreme Court can’t misinterpret.”
Reynold’s First Law:
Subsidizing the markers of status doesn’t produce the character traits that result in that status; it undermines them.
Reynold’s Second Law:
The more a government wants to run its citizens’ lives, the worse job it will do at the most basic tasks of government.
Reynold’s Third Law:
Whatever politicians control, they will use against you to get what they want.
Can’t say I disagree with any of ’em.
Yeah, right.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2diNojgJF9c?rel=0]
Damn, there are some stupid fucking people in this country.
UPDATE:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yepOera6qKI?rel=0]
See?
On the Boston Bomber:

…said no one, ever.
Edited to add, via Arms and the Law:
Nate Bell of the Ark. legislature tweeted: “I wonder how many Boston liberals spent the night cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine?”
The Huffngton Post tries to critique that, but the most it can say is that it is “insensitive”. I think that means “true and annoying.”