So they’re doing “Empty Chair Day” on Twitter.
I laughed out loud at this one:

But these aren’t bad either:


The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. – Ayn Rand
So they’re doing “Empty Chair Day” on Twitter.
I laughed out loud at this one:

But these aren’t bad either:


British expat Phil B. emails a couple of interesting links. First up:
A government minister has issued an impassioned defence of two of his constituents, saying they should not be prosecuted for shooting two suspected burglars who allegedly broke into their remote farm cottage.
Once again, the weapon involved was a shotgun, but this time Mr. Andy Ferrie cannot claim before the court that the gun discharged by accident. That defense worked for Kenneth Batchelor, but he fired only one shot. Mr. Ferrie fired two rounds, and hit two of the four burglars invading his home.
Mr. Batchelor had unlocked his gun cabinet, retrieved his shotgun, unlocked the ammo cabinet, loaded his shotgun, pointed the shotgun at one Matthew Clements, a 41 year-old 280-lb. professional bouncer, who had climbed up a construction scaffold outside Mr. Batchelor’s home and climbed in a bedroom window, verbally threatening violence. But the actual discharge of the shotgun was accidental. Mr. Batchelor had to claim the shooting was an accident, because otherwise he could be convicted of murder in the death of Mr. Clements. Clements was “known to police,” and had reportedly threatened a garage manager with an Uzi sub-machine gun. But under English law, according to the humorously named lawyer Harry Potter as once explained to murder defendant Brett Osborne,
The law does not require the intention to kill for a prosecution for murder to succeed. All that is required is an intention to cause serious bodily harm. That intention can be fleeting and momentary. But if it is there in any form at all for just a second – that is, if the blow you struck was deliberate rather than accidental – you can be guilty of murder and spend the rest of your life in prison.
Deliberately shooting not one, but two burglars indicates “an intention to cause serious bodily harm.”
As it should.
Since the burglars struck by Mr. Ferrie’s shotgun blasts did not die, he stands accused of “GBH” – Grievous Bodily Harm.
The Ferries have been burglarized several times previously. RTW story. Very interesting.
And then we have the flip-side, another case of “Only Ones” acting as only they can:
A policeman shouted ‘sweet as’ moments after his colleague gunned down a suspect, an inquiry heard yesterday.
Azelle Rodney, 24, died instantly when he was shot six times in a busy high street.
The rounds were fired from the open window of a patrol car within a split second of it pulling alongside the VW Golf carrying Rodney.
The firearms officer – known only as E7 – was sitting in the front seat and let off eight shots after police in another car had forced the Golf to slow down.
Six hits out of eight shots! Perhaps the NYPD should send their officers to England to learn how to shoot? Or at least do drive-bys?
Now, in this case the shooting victim died, but the officer involved was not charged with homicide, even though the victim turned out not to have a firearm within reach. Why? Because according to British law, what the officer believed at the time is more important than reality. See the case of Harry Stanley, shot to death by police officers when they thought the table leg he was carrying wrapped in a plastic bag was a sawed-off shotgun. In the case of Mr. Rodney, police believed
that Rodney and the two men with him had machine guns and were on their way to rob Colombian drug dealers.
You’ll note that “E7” didn’t have to wait until the car pulled alongside to unlock his gun case, take out his gun, unlock the ammo box, and then load his gun before discharging eight rounds into the VW Golf.
No, “E7” is sprinkled with the magic fairy-dust of a government paycheck. Mr. Ferrie provides that fairy-dust.
Good luck to Mr. Ferrie – and his wife, who was also arrested on the same charges. Even if they’re acquitted, he’s going to have a hell of a legal bill. And they probably won’t have enough money left over to get the hell out of England for Australia as they had planned.
I’m betting that they’ll plead guilty to some reduced charges to save themselves money – but they’ll always have a record.
Quote of the day, from Tam:
You know, you expect it from MSNBC, but from the national network shows down to the local news programs, the Party Convention-related blurbs this morning have all had an air of
“Now that the Nazis in Tampa have finished their cross-burning, put women back in purdah, and shoved grandma onto an ice floe, let’s see what the Real Americans are doing in Charlotte. Bob, over to you; do you have any official sense yet on how much more the Real Americans care about the little guy than the Nazis do, or are they saving that for a surprise?“
Well, Barry still hasn’t lost his core constituency: The American media.
But, but George Stephanopoulos says there’s no bias in the media!
And by all means, read the rest of Tam’s post, which would be a QotD in and of itself.

As far as I have been able to determine, most voters aren’t paying much attention to anything.
And the politicians have done everything in their power to make it that way.
(Found at the Feral Irishman‘s.)
Parenting is an interesting metaphor for taking care of a country. The Democrats remind me of a family with two kids: one whom they think is “normal” and the other whom they think is “special” – delicate, sensitive, sickly, utterly dependent on them for everything. As parents, they completely ignore the “normal” kid and devote all their love, attention, and money to the “special” one. The life of the whole family revolves around him.The fact is, half the reason he’s so sickly is that he’s been treated this way all his life.
When the Democrats are in charge, I feel like the “normal” brother.
— “Bugs” in a comment at The GOP Goes Alinsky on Obama by J. Christian Adams at PJ Media
Interesting observation.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLelSaD1zHU?rel=0&w=640&h=360]
I can hear the howls of outrage now.
I know a couple of champions!
OK, I’m backlogged. I have another essay on Rights that I owe people from a couple of weeks ago. I’ve started it, but it looks like another überpost, and those take a bit. Markadelphia has returned, once again wrapped in his blanket of “I’m not, you are!” I owe HIM a response to something from quite a while back, but that’s not gonna happen until after the Rights piece.
I’m buried at work, and I’m supposed to go on vacation starting Labor Day weekend, but it now looks like I’ll be tied up for a day or two on an emergency project before leaving for Gun Blogger Rendezvous VII on Thursday of next week – and if you think I’ll be doing any non-GBR related posting over THAT weekend, you’ve got another think coming. Over Labor Day and the days leading up to leaving I WAS going to finish painting the exterior of my house. I still hope to get to that. Blogging will, of course, suffer.
Somewhere in there I need to load some more ammo for the trip, get all my stuff put together and in the same place.
TL;DR version: Don’t expect much out of me for a week or three.
This was in my inbox when I returned from lunch today:
Sir,
I found your blog earlier today by accident, and have enjoyed the ensuing perusal. I wanted to add a smidgen of perspective to your already-comprehensive discussions.
I am Canadian, a long-time shooter, and a student of history. I have extensive knowledge of the anti-gun machinations of my own government, beginning with the FAC program incept in 1978.
During the implementation process of our gun control measures, the plan was at every step argued against by well-reasoned, rational, calm, logical and effortlessly sensible persons who took great pains to carefully explain why further gun control measures were worthless and most certainly would not achieve the results being sold to the general public as their justification.
It eventually dawned on me, as I watched the government repeatedly ignore these eminently commonsensical explanations and forge ahead with complete disregard for logic, that the whole thing wasn’t about what was logical or rational. It was about what the government wanted to do. End of story.
I determined then that when governments do things that make no sense and fly in the face of logic that even an utter simpleton could comprehend, it does not mean that senses have been taken complete leave of. It simply means that there are portions of the operative agenda that you have not, for whatever reason, been made privy to.
Gun control is not, and never has been, about what is logical or reasonable. It is far worse than that, because what remains after removing those two as potential justifiers, must be the truth…….
Yours Most Respectfully,
Michael D Young
Ontario, CANADA
…and I would’ve gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for those meddling kids…
Hear, hear for us meddling kids!

Got that one from my brother in email tonight. Kinda reminds me of this one:
In other news, Dinesh D’Souza’s new film 2016: Obama’s America is apparently going to be #3 at the box office this week, even though it is in limited release, and it’s gaining in per-theater ticket sales with each successive week. I didn’t realize it had opened here in Tucson this weekend. I’ll have to catch it soon. This is one I won’t mind paying full-price to see.
In Bill Whittle’s latest Stratosphere Lounge ‘cast, he said something interesting (I know, shocking, innit?):
There’s no question that American businesses are sitting on tons of money. There’s an enormous amount of private capital out there waiting to be spent, and they’re not spending it, and rightfully so. They’re not spending it because these Marxists in Washington have demonized business, demonized prosperity, demonized success, so rightfully and sensibly companies are not spending money. They’re not hiring people or buying new trucks or opening factories because they don’t know what the tax rate is. They haven’t even passed a budget in three years! They can’t predict it.
Then (viewer) Jeremy’s made this point – he’s said that it’s better to have a high tax rate that we know is coming than it is to have an unknowable tax rate, because businesses have to plan ahead. So if Ryan and Romney, Romney and Ryan, are elected in November, I predict the Dow’s going to jump five thousand points overnight, and before he’s inagurated the economy’s going to be up four, five, six percent in growth because of this.
Of course, needless to say, all the liberals will say it’s racism and Obama has already gone on record saying he doesn’t want Romney elected because Romney’s gonna get credit for the economic recovery which is going to be here just any minute. So if Romney is elected and the Dow jumps five thousand points the next day, and everybody starts hiring, Obama’s woulda said, “Man, if that election woulda only happened a week later, I woulda won!”
Yup.