The FBI announced Monday that citizens stopped six active shooters in 2021, according to a report on active shooting incidents.
Citizens stopped six active shooters, whom the FBI defines as “one or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area,” in 2021, killing four of them, according to the report “Active Shooter Incidents In The United States In 2021.” There were 61 active shooter incidents in 2021, 12 of which met the FBI’s criteria for a “mass killing,” up from 40 the previous year.
Carry your gun. It’s a much lighter burden than regret.
A couple of years ago I answered a question over at Quora: Why did the Gun Control Act of 1968 fail to solve the issue of mass shootings?
In light of recent events, I thought I’d share my answer:
Because a mass shooting requires only three things: A gun, someone willing to acquire, load, point and shoot the gun, and a group of three or more people other than the shooter.
There are, by several estimates, something between 300,000,000 and 500,000,000 guns currently in private hands in the United States. We have population in excess of 330,000,000 people. If 0.001% of that population meets criteria #2, they can get criteria #1. Every single day you’re probably part of criteria #3.
You’re looking at 3,300 potential shooters based on that off-the-cuff estimate.
In its first year, Team Biden added more than 72,000 pages of regulations, executive orders and agency notices. … Biden’s team also pushed through more major regulations in his first year than any president in modern US history….
President Trump issued Executive Order 13,771, in January, ordering the executive branch regulatory agencies to roll back two regulations for each new regulation issued. On December 14, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) unveiled a preliminary estimate of the regulatory reform actions taken by the Trump administration through the end of fiscal year 2017 (September 30). From the end of January through September, the administration completed 67 deregulatory actions to only 3 new regulatory actions and reduced the regulatory burden by $8.1 billion (net present value of lifetime burden) or $570.4 million annually.
I’ve read a lot of law, but I have not delved into the “Progressive Administrative State” as I should have. Excerpt:
The great mission of the early twentieth century Progressives was to transform our constitutional order without ever amending the Constitution itself. The intellectual leader of the movement was Woodrow Wilson. The fundamental idea was to replace the messy and contentious system of separated powers and slow bi-cameral lawmaking with a cadre of supposedly apolitical administrative “experts” who could run the country smoothly and efficiently.
The idea sounded rather benign to most people at the time, and probably still sounds benign to most people today. Who could be against having “experts” to run significant government agencies? But a hundred-plus years into this project, we have seen cancerous growth of vast administrative bureaucracies, outside the constitutional structure, and exercising great powers, but accountable to no one but themselves — the very antithesis of the constitutional structure that our founders attempted to bequeath to us.
(Apologies to Pink Floyd for stealing their line, and this is an überpost. You’ve been warned. Oh, and I’ve been adding to this since originally published as I keep finding things that should be part of it.)
A few weeks ago I caught a 30-day trip to the Zulag for sharing an education meme and my comment on it:
Individual, private possession of firearms isn’t the only thing that permits individual liberty, but it is one of the essential components in a society that intends to stay free. An armed, informed, reasoning people cannot be subjugated.
So what do you do if you want to fetter a free people?
1) Remove their ability to reason.
2) Constrain their ability to access and exchange information.
3) Relieve them of the means with which to defend themselves and their property.
Which of these seems easiest, and how would it be best accomplished? And best resisted?
I thought the easiest method would be disarming the public. I Was Wrong. Deeply, deeply wrong. And far too late.
I’ve been writing essays on the deplorable American public schools since I started blogging. The first one was Our Collapsing Schools, May 21, 2003 about a straight-A student, a Junior at a “good” high school in Covina, California who was college-bound. She wasn’t capable of writing a research paper.
It has only gotten worse over time. A lot worse. She could at least read.
But perhaps we have finally reached a point where the people most responsible for children’s education – that is, parents – are beginning to realize just how bad it is. Also too late, but here’s just a couple more data points.
According to a recent report, California now leads the country in illiteracy. In fact, 23.1 percent of Californians over age 15 cannot read this sentence.
While the problem has many causes, much of the blame falls on the state’s failing public schools. The 2019 National Assessment of Educational Progress found that just 30 percent of California eighth-graders are proficient in reading. And those numbers reflect results gathered before the Covid-19 lockdowns.
Just in case you were educated in California, a quarter of adults in that state are illiterate. A little less than a third of the upcoming generation could read this überpost and understand it. (And honestly, I doubt more than 50% (that’s “half” if you went to school in Covina) of the adult population there could.
California is the state I posted MoneyMoneyMoneyMoney about in 2009. Jonathan Kozol, according to Wikipedia, is “an American writer, progressive activist, and educator, best known for his books on public education in the United States.” Kozol blamed the failure of California’s education system on – you guessed it – insufficient spending. Then-California State Representative Tom McClintock wrote an op-ed on that topic. Go read the post.
To find out how much better educated Americans were before compulsory attendance laws and government schools existed, all we have to do is read DuPont de Nemours fascinating little book, National Education in the United States of America, published in 1812. He writes:
“The United States are more advanced in their educational facilities than most countries.
“They have a large number of primary schools; and as their paternal affection protects children from working in the fields, it is possible to send them to the schoolmasters — a condition which does not prevail in Europe.
“Most young Americans, therefore, can read, write and cipher. Not more than four in a thousand are unable to write legibly — even neatly….
Now even prospective teachers don’t need to be literate.
The purpose of government, according to the Founders, was to create the conditions in which individuals can pursue happiness. It is not there to deliver it to them.
The purpose of education is to impart upon individuals the tools necessaryto pursue happiness.
The purpose of public schooling is not education, it is indoctrination.
“I quoted the Trilateral Commision view of the educational system, namely it’s a system for the indoctrination of the young. And I think that’s correct. It’s a system for the indoctrination of the young. That’s the way the liberal elites viewed it and they’re more or less accurate. The education system is supposed to train people to be obedient, conformist, not think too much, do what you’re told, stay passive, don’t cause any crises of democracy, don’t raise any questions and so on. That’s basically what the system is about.” Noam Chomsky.
“Teaching means different things in different places, but seven lessons are universally taught from Harlem to the Hollywood Hills. They constitute a national curriculum you pay for in more ways than you can imagine, so you might as well know what it is. You are at liberty, of course, to regard these lessons any way you like, but believe me when I say I intend no irony in this presentation. These are the things I teach, these are the things you pay me to teach. Make of them what you will.
1. Confusion 2. Class Position 3. Indifference 4. Emotional Dependency 5. Intellectual Dependency 6. Provisional Self-esteem 7. One Can’t Hide
I edited out the examples he gave for each. RTWT. Notice he doesn’t mention reading, writing, mathematics or science.
“A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare.” – Judge H. Walter Croskey, In Re. Rachel L. (2008)
Henry Louis Mencken:
And what is a good citizen? Simply one who never says, does or thinks anything that is unusual. Schools are maintained in order to bring this uniformity up to the highest possible point. A school is a hopper into which children are heaved while they are still young and tender; therein they are pressed into certain standard shapes and covered from head to heels with official rubber-stamps.
The (British) schools would produce the people who would then become parts of the bureaucratic administrative machine. They must be identical to each other. They must know three things: they must have good handwriting because the data is handwritten, they must be able to read, and they must be able to do multiplication, division, addition and subtraction in their head. They must be so identical that you could pick one up from New Zealand and ship them to Canada and he would be instantly functional.
The Victorians were great engineers. They engineered a system that was so robust that it is still with us today, continuously producing identical people for a machine that no longer exists.
But they don’t even do that anymore.
The judge quoted above isn’t wrong. A primary purpose of the educational system was to make good citizens. And both Chomsky and Mencken are right, too, about what the System believes a “good citizen” should be, and it uses Gatto’s seven lessons to churn out those “certain standard shapes covered from head to heels in official rubber-stamps.”
Public Education was a machine designed to produce identical little cogs that fit happily into the Great Machine, but the indoctrination has changed over time. Gatto himself noted when the current regime kicked off:
“I lived through the great transformation which turned schools from often useful places (if never the essential ones school publicists claimed) into laboratories of state experimentation. When I began teaching in 1961, the social environment of Manhattan schools was a distant cousin of the western Pennsylvania schools I attended in the 1940s, as Darwin was a distant cousin of Malthus. — Then suddenly in 1965 everything changed.
Whatever the event is that I’m actually referring to—and its full dimensions are still only partially clear to me—it was a nationwide phenomenon simultaneously arriving in all big cities coast to coast, penetrating the hinterlands afterwards. Whatever it was, it arrived all at once, the way we see national testing and other remote-control school matters like School-to-Work legislation appear in every state today at the same time. A plan was being orchestrated, the nature of which is unmasked in the upcoming chapters.”
What was the change? Well, I believe, and the evidence supports, that around that time the early products of what Rudi Dutschke called “The Long March Through the Institutions,” a march that started in the 1920’s, hit the hallowed halls of academia in a wave. The third generation of the Progressive disciples of education reformer John Dewey, a man who wrote “I believe that education is the fundamental method of social progress and reform” had taken over the public schools. They were the Progressive Professors of Education, the policy makers, the experts, and they finally had the power to change things! And they did.
Dewey was central to the introduction of compulsory State education in the Prussian style. That was deliberate, and it led to the Seven Lesson Schoolteacher Gatto wrote about, with the intent of social engineering, this time to make little cogs that fit into the Great Society.
Much of this sweeping change was the result of the Frankfurt School‘s creation of Critical Theory. and one of its greatest proponents, Herbert Marcuse. It spawned others as well, such as educational theorist Paolo Friere whose book Pedagogy of the Oppressed, first published in 1968, has become a common textbook in Schools of Education in the U.S. One of Friere’s best known quotes is “The educator has the duty of not being neutral.” No, they must proselytize.
The result of this is the public school system being a factory no longer for the manufacture of good citizens, but radical activists. Since 1965 we’ve had nearly three more generations indoctrinated under this system. A certain percentage of current parents are the grandchildren of the first wave, and it has had its effect.
She is just one of millions. But millions more aren’t as lucky.
Despite the title of this überpost, this is not an excoriation of public school teachers. The vast majority of them are simply products of the system they now inhabit. There are occasionally some exceptional teachers who can accomplish great things in the face of vigorous opposition. Jaime Escalante is a sterling example, teaching AP calculus to students in a high school known for poor academic performance. Most teachers aren’t able, much less willing to buck the administration, and I can’t blame them. Gatto bashed his head against the NYC educational administration until he’d had enough and quit.
No, my problem is with a system captured wholly by the Woke that has produced generations of the brainwashed. From a new teacher:
Read the links. Teachers have no defense against that, especially when they aren’t backed up by the administration. And they aren’t, even if they’re the Wokest of the Woke. God help them if they’re notand don’t hide it. No one else will. Toe the line or lose your job. Don’t piss off the parent(s) or the Administration.
Just as one unruly child can wreak havoc on classroom learning, one bad parent can wreak havoc on a teacher’s career. And there’s no solution to this problem available.
The bad teachers outnumber the good, and the rest are just there to collect a paycheck and their retirement, and above all of them is an administration promulgating the policies that prevent, you know, education.
‘Once men gain power over other men’s minds, that power is never used sparingly and wisely.’ – E.B. White
The result is a population that cannot read, but can vote. That doesn’t question, just accepts. That can’t reason, but can be manipulated. And even many who can read still cannot reason. They never learned how because no one taught them, and they were unable and/or unwilling to teach themselves. They are seldom right, but always certain, and any love of learning they entered the system with has been thoroughly beaten out of them.
As I recently argued elsewhere, America’s educational system has not prepared us for the government power grab because it does not create enough Emersonian independent thinkers or, frankly, even adult thinkers. Due to the extreme Left bias of higher education, many of America’s college graduates remain intellectually infantilized to the point that they can do little more than Tweet ignorant hate at any idea that does not accord with Progressive mantras. – Robert E. Wright
The public school system cannot be reformed. I must be destroyed and the people in it must never have power over children again. It is my belief that almost all children are born with a need and an ability to learn, and that they can educate themselves given the opportunity, the tools and the encouragement. One last excerpt from my previous education überpost, again from Dr. Sugata Mitra:
I made a hole in the boundary wall of the slum next to my office, and stuck a computer inside just to see what would happen if I gave a computer to children who never would have one, didn’t know any English, didn’t know what the Internet was. The children came running in. It was three feet off the ground, and they said “What is this?” And I said “Yeah, it’s, I don’t know.” They said “Why did you put it there?” I said “Just like that.” And they said “Can we touch it?” And I said “If you wish to.” And I went away.
About eight hours later, we found them browsing, and teaching each other how to browse. So I said “That’s impossible, because- You know how is it possible? They don’t know anything.” My colleagues said “no it’s a simple solution. One of your students must have been passing by and showed them how to use the mouse.” So I said “Yeah, that’s possible.” So I repeated the experiment. I went 300 miles out of Delhi into a really remote village where the chances of a passing software development engineer was very little. I repeated the experiment there. There was no place to stay, so I stuck my computer in, I went away. I came back after a couple of months, found kids playing games on it. When they saw me they said “We want a faster processor and a better mouse.” So I said “How on Earth do you know all this?” And they said something very interesting to me. In an irritated voice they said “You’ve given us a machine that works only in English, so we had to teach ourselves English in order to use it.” That’s the first time as a teacher I’ve heard the words “teach ourselves” said so casually.
Azimov was correct. Self-education is the only real kind of education, and the only thing formal schooling is for is to make self-education possible.
Nineteen years ago, I hit “Publish” on my very first blog post, over at the old site. That’s 133 in Blogyears. 7,288 posts so far, about 383 per calendar year, just over one post per day on average. I haven’t been posting much of late, but I have a ridiculously long überpost in the pipe, so this thing ain’t dead yet.
I’ve been shouting at clouds for nineteen years now, with damned little to show for it. Each day we’re just that little bit closer to the excrement impacting the rotating air impeller, but still we keep soldiering on. That which cannot go on, won’t.
To those who have been following this thing for a while, thank you. Looks like I’ll be doing this for a while longer, assuming the power stays on.
“Here’s the thing. I mean, here’s my feeling about the leaker. I would like to find out who the leaker is so I could make sweet love to that person, because that person is a hero to me. Okay? And if the leaker, a lot of people are saying it could be a conservative, if the leaker is a Republican and if I get pregnant during our lovemaking, I will joyfully abort our fetus and let them know. I don’t know that answered your question. It probably didn’t.”