“When dealing with guns, the citizen acts at his peril.”

That’s a quote from the 1996 New Jersey Superior Court decision State vs. Pelleteri, which I have discussed previously.

That’s obviously still the law of the land in the People’s Democratic Republic of New Jersey (PDRNJ) as evidenced by this latest story:

Family Says New Jersey Overreacted To Boy’s Gun Photo On Facebook

The ruddy-cheeked, camouflage-clad boy in the photo smiles out from behind a pair of glasses, proudly holding a gun his father gave him as a present for his upcoming 11th birthday.

The weapon in the photo, posted by his dad on Facebook, resembles a military-style assault rifle but, his father says, is actually just a .22-caliber copy. And that, the family believes, is why child welfare case workers and police officers visited the home in Carneys Point last Friday and asked to see his guns.

New Jersey’s Department of Children and Families declined to comment specifically on the case but says it often follows up on tips. The family and an attorney say father Shawn Moore’s Second Amendment rights to bear arms were threatened in a state that already has some of the nation’s strictest gun laws and is considering strengthening them after December’s schoolhouse massacre in Connecticut.

In this case, the family believes someone called New Jersey’s anonymous child abuse hotline.

Moore said he called his lawyer Evan Nappen, who specializes in Second Amendment cases, and had him on speakerphone as he arrived at his house in Carneys Point, just across the Delaware River from Wilmington, Del.

He’s got a good lawyer, anyway.

Here’s the really interesting part:

“They said they wanted to see into my safe and see if my guns were registered,” Moore said. “I said no; in New Jersey, your guns don’t have to be registered with the state; it’s voluntary. I knew once I opened that safe, there was no going back.”

With the lawyer listening in on the phone, Moore said he asked the investigators and police officers whether they had a warrant to search his home. When they said no, he asked them to leave. One of the child welfare officials would not identify herself when Moore asked for her name, he said.

The agents and the police officers left, and nothing has happened since, he said.

“I don’t like what happened,” he said. “You’re not even safe in your own house. If they can just show up at any time and make you open safes and go through your house, that’s not freedom; it’s like tyranny.”

State child welfare spokeswoman Kristine Brown said that when it receives a report of suspected abuse or neglect, it assigns a caseworker to follow up. She said law enforcement officers are asked to accompany caseworkers only if the caseworkers feel their safety could be compromised.

“No going back,” indeed.

Joseph Pelleteri was convicted of possession of an “assault weapon” when his safe was searched and a Marlin Model 60 that he had won in a target competition – manufacturer’s tags still dangling from the trigger guard – was found. Since that weapon could hold 17 rounds of .22 Long Rifle in its magazine tube, and that “highly dangerous offensive weapon” wasn’t licensed, Mr. Pelleteri was convicted of a felony and stripped of his right to arms. Shawn Moore was exactly right in refusing to allow his safe to be searched without a warrant.

But note also that in the PDRNJ, a picture of a  “camoflage-clad boy” smiling while “proudly holding a gun his father gave him as a present” qualifies as potential “abuse or neglect” to “state child welfare” workers.

When dealing with the State, the citizen acts at his peril.

And that’s not the way it’s supposed to be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.