The blogosphere (at least the part of it that follows the gun rights agenda) is abuzz over this article:
New Orleans Begins Confiscating Firearms as Water Recedes
By ALEX BERENSON and TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Published: September 8, 2005NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 8 – Waters were receding across this flood-beaten city today as police officers began confiscating weapons, including legally registered firearms, from civilians in preparation for a mass forced evacuation of the residents still living here.
No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. “Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons,” he said.
But that order apparently does not apply to hundreds of security guards hired by businesses and some wealthy individuals to protect property. The guards, employees of private security companies like Blackwater, openly carry M-16’s and other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.
(T)he Louisiana Constitution, art. I, sec. 11 (enacted 1974), provides that
The right of each citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person.
Is there some implicit emergency exception to the right to bear arms here? On the other hand, doesn’t the emergency make the right especially valuable to the rightsholders? Should it matter that the government seems willing to let “businesses and some wealthy individuals” hire to people use arms “to protect their property,” but isn’t willing to let less wealthy individuals use themselves and their friends and relatives to protect their property (and their bodies and their lives)?
The NYT piece continues:
Nearly two weeks after the floods began, New Orleans has turned into an armed camp, patrolled by thousands of local, state, and federal law enforcement officers, as well as National Guard troops and active-duty soldiers. While armed looters roamed unchecked last week, the city is now calm. No arrests were made on Wednesday night or this morning, and the police received only 10 calls for service, a police spokesman said.
Not exactly “unchecked.” Armed citizens checked them pretty well in many accounts, while there were no local, state, or federal law enforcement officers available to respond to calls for service or perform arrests.
Continuing:
Many neighborhoods in the northern half of New Orleans remain under 10 feet of water, and Mr. Compass said today that the city’s plans for a forced evacuation remained in effect because of the danger of disease and fires.
Mr. Compass said he could not disclose when New Orleans residents might be forced to leave en masse, but other police officers and law enforcement officials said the city planned to start as early as tonight.
The city’s Police Department and federal law enforcement officers from agencies like the United States Marshals Service will lead the evacuation, Mr. Compass said. Officers will search houses in both dry and flooded neighborhoods, and no one will be allowed to stay, he said.
Many of the residents still in the city said they did not understand why the city remained intent on forcing them out.
“I know the risks,” said Renee de Pontchieux, as she sat on a stool outside Kajun’s Pub in the working-class Bywater neighborhood east of downtown. “We used to think we lived in America – now we’re not so sure. Why should we allow this government to chase us out and allow people from outside to rebuild our homes? We want to rebuild our homes.”
But Ms. De Pontchieux said she was resigned to being evacuated if the police insisted. “It would be foolish” to fight, she said.
But I’m wondering if this forced disarmament and evacuation won’t force at least a couple of people over the edge. Back in June I wrote Freedom’s Just Another Word for Nothin’ Left to Lose. Most of these people literally don’t have much left.
An estimated 5,000 to 10,000 people remain inside New Orleans more than a week after Hurricane Katrina hit, many in neighborhoods that are on high ground near the Mississippi River.
—
Among the authorities, though, some confusion lingered about how a widespread evacuation by force would work, and how much support it would get at the federal and state level. Mayor C. Ray Nagin told the police and the military on Tuesday to remove all residents for their own safety, and on Wednesday, the police superintendent, Mr. Compass, said state laws give the mayor the authority to declare martial law and order the evacuations.
“There’s a martial law declaration in place that gives us legal authority for mandatory evacuations,” Mr. Compass said. “We’ll use the minimum amount of force necessary.”
“Legal authority”? I don’t think so. But what the government can do, and what it is legally empowered to do are two vastly different things.
State officials said Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco could tell the Guard to carry out the forced removals, but they stopped short of a commitment to do so. In Washington, Lt. Gen. Joseph R. Inge, deputy commander of the United States Northern Command, said regular troops “would not be used” in any forced evacuation.
Glad to hear that.
The state disaster law does not supersede either the state or federal Constitutions, said Kenneth M. Murchison, a law professor at Louisiana State University. But even so, Mr. Nagin’s decision could be a smart strategy that does not violate fundamental rights, Professor Murchison said.
Illegal, but smart? I don’t see how forced disarmament and forced relocation do not “violate fundamental rights.”
The people left in New Orleans are the ones who are too stubborn to leave, too intent on criminality to leave, or lacked the ability to leave. They are also the ones least likely to understand what their rights actually are. If I had lived in New Orleans (as if) I’d have left before the storm hit, and I’d have had at least most of my firearms with me already, but there’s the possibility that one or two of the stubborn ones still living in the city might find forced disarmament and forced evacuation to be their own personal breaking point – the point at which they are willing to press the “reset button.” But the overwhelming majority will most definitely just go along.
And the rest of us will just sit and watch.